PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Masters of the Air (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/591293-masters-air.html)

Downwind.Maddl-Land 27th Jan 2024 15:13


Originally Posted by 212man (Post 11584690)
Whats a V3? Did you mean V1 & V2?

V3 was the designation of the long range guns located at Mimoyecques in France. Destroyed - in daylight - by 617 Sqn using TALLBOYs in another Bomber Command precision strike.

NutLoose 27th Jan 2024 16:17

Watching the first episode now as I have Apple TV and it Is forming up to be a cracking series IMHO.

Even you have not got Apple TV I think you will find you can watch the first episode on it as a trial.

DaveReidUK 27th Jan 2024 16:51


Originally Posted by Geriaviator (Post 11584696)
which could deliver steady rain of 210lb shells per minute

What does that mean ?

Flyingmac 27th Jan 2024 17:03


Originally Posted by DaveReidUK (Post 11584730)
What does that mean ?

Rate of fire claimed to be ten per minute. We'll never know.

Sam W 27th Jan 2024 17:45

Geri wrote:


When the lead bombardier opened his bomb doors, the others followed suit, watching for his bombs to fall, when they too pressed the button, the target receiving a simultaneous rain of bombs half a mile wide and one mile long. So it wasn't carpet bombing?
No it wasn’t, when you compare it to the RAF only being able to get 1 in 3 bombs dropped within FIVE miles of the target before the pathfinders it has to be considered precision for the time. Often the average 8th groups matched the accuracy of the most highly trained RAF specialists as the destruction of the FW plant at Marienburg demonstrated.

​​​​​​​

tdracer 27th Jan 2024 18:27

Sorry to add fuel to the tread drift of bombing accuracy - in the book "Inferno", the author (Joe Pappalardo) claims that a post war study comparing bombing accuracy between the RAF and the USAAF (IIRC, it was percentage of bombs within a given distance of the 'target'), the USAAF was better, but the difference was slight - as in about 1%.
According to what I've also read, the Norden had the capability of being very accurate, but that was with manufacturing tolerances what were impossible to meet in the sort of mass production that was required and with more knowledge of ambient conditions (especially wind speeds) than the bombers could possibly have in wartime.

beamer 27th Jan 2024 18:30

Well, I watched the two episodes last night and to be honest I was thoroughly underwhelmed. I know it’s a drama, based on fact, which at the end of the day is supposed to be entertainment and therefore those of us with some understanding of the valiant efforts of the 8th Air Force and some knowledge of aviation are not really the target audience.

I found the storyline thin and too many of the leading characters looking very unconvincing. The CGI was poor, the scenes inside the aircraft much better.
The stereotype token RAF scene was pathetic rather like Nigel Pargetter appearing as a
senior Parachute Regiment Officer in Band of Brothers ! I did quite enjoy the crosswind landing scene into Greenland which made me feel rather nostalgic……….

Hopefully a disappointing start which will lead to improvement in future episodes.

PPRuNeUser0211 27th Jan 2024 21:03


Originally Posted by tdracer (Post 11584774)
Sorry to add fuel to the tread drift of bombing accuracy - in the book "Inferno", the author (Joe Pappalardo) claims that a post war study comparing bombing accuracy between the RAF and the USAAF (IIRC, it was percentage of bombs within a given distance of the 'target'), the USAAF was better, but the difference was slight - as in about 1%.
According to what I've also read, the Norden had the capability of being very accurate, but that was with manufacturing tolerances what were impossible to meet in the sort of mass production that was required and with more knowledge of ambient conditions (especially wind speeds) than the bombers could possibly have in wartime.

The United States Strategic Bombing Study Download here

NutLoose 28th Jan 2024 10:34


Originally Posted by beamer (Post 11584776)
Well, I watched the two episodes last night and to be honest I was thoroughly underwhelmed. I know it’s a drama, based on fact, which at the end of the day is supposed to be entertainment and therefore those of us with some understanding of the valiant efforts of the 8th Air Force and some knowledge of aviation are not really the target audience.

I found the storyline thin and too many of the leading characters looking very unconvincing. The CGI was poor, the scenes inside the aircraft much better.
The stereotype token RAF scene was pathetic rather like Nigel Pargetter appearing as a
senior Parachute Regiment Officer in Band of Brothers ! I did quite enjoy the crosswind landing scene into Greenland which made me feel rather nostalgic……….

Hopefully a disappointing start which will lead to improvement in future episodes.

I find series always are when they are building up. I cannot fault the CGI, it’s one off my pet hates when people slag it off because most of the time they do not realise they are watching it.

cynicalint 28th Jan 2024 17:36

An interesting article on the pros and cons of the RAF approach and the USAF approach to bombing. The Norden bomb sight was quite accurate at 1500' and lower, but as would be expected rose considerably with increased altitude.

The Allied Rift on Strategic Bombing | Air & Space Forces Magazine (airandspaceforces.com)


On average, in 1939, only a third of the bombs hit within five miles of the aiming point. In the Ruhr Valley—Germany’s industrial heartland, defended by guns and fighters—strikes were even less accurate.

“ In 1943, rather than dropping bombs into pickle barrels, 8th Air Force bombardiers were having trouble hitting the broad side of a barn,” said historian Stephen L. McFarland of Air University. Average CEP soared to 1,200 feet.​​​​​​​

sandiego89 29th Jan 2024 13:19

2 episodes in and I liked. it. I tend to be overly analytical on computer animation and aircraft details, but I told myself to just sit back and enjoy it, and I did. The interior aircraft sets and the detail, such as switches, checklists, etc. are incredible. The CGI is acceptable and the characters (from an American point of view) are fine.

NutLoose 29th Jan 2024 14:34

Sandeigo, see

https://screenrant.com/masters-of-th...racy-expained/

https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/articl...rical-accuracy

fdr 30th Jan 2024 01:31


Originally Posted by cynicalint (Post 11585337)
An interesting article on the pros and cons of the RAF approach and the USAF approach to bombing. The Norden bomb sight was quite accurate at 1500' and lower, but as would be expected rose considerably with increased altitude.

The Allied Rift on Strategic Bombing | Air & Space Forces Magazine (airandspaceforces.com)

China graph on the windscreen works from 1500'...

snapper41 6th Feb 2024 11:28

Episode three:

’This is the largest air armada ever assembled in the history of mankind!’

Well, apart from the three RAF 1,000 bomber raids over a year earlier, all of which were bigger…

Hamish 123 6th Feb 2024 14:00

As with all CGI of WW2 aeroplanes, the speeds they fly at look completely wrong. The ME109s flashing through the B17 formations appear to be going at phenomenal speeds, way in excess of the 350 - 400mph they were probably doing. If you look at actual footage from these battles, the German fighters are going nowhere near the speeds portrayed by CGI. I assume that they're all speeded up to add to the excitement, but it just looks wrong to me.

Stuck On The Ground 6th Feb 2024 15:52

I enjoyed seeing the houses outside the airfield perimeter with the UPVC guttering!

Im enjoying it. The incident with the RAF in episode 2 smacks of lazy stereotyping to me, but then the target market is the US audience, not the UKs.

sangiovese. 6th Feb 2024 16:12

I find the randomness at which crews are lost utterly terrifying. It’s telling a terrible story which needs to be retold

GlobalNav 6th Feb 2024 16:54


Originally Posted by Hamish 123 (Post 11591490)
As with all CGI of WW2 aeroplanes, the speeds they fly at look completely wrong. The ME109s flashing through the B17 formations appear to be going at phenomenal speeds, way in excess of the 350 - 400mph they were probably doing. If you look at actual footage from these battles, the German fighters are going nowhere near the speeds portrayed by CGI. I assume that they're all speeded up to add to the excitement, but it just looks wrong to me.

Perhaps, but keep in mind you’re viewing from a moving platform and seeing closing speeds of 600+ mph. And from the crewmen’s perspective, they were coming fast and furious.

PPRuNeUser0211 6th Feb 2024 17:40


Originally Posted by Stuck On The Ground (Post 11591565)
I enjoyed seeing the houses outside the airfield perimeter with the UPVC guttering!

Im enjoying it. The incident with the RAF in episode 2 smacks of lazy stereotyping to me, but then the target market is the US audience, not the UKs.

Easy to forget the assessment at the end where they decide the RAF are probably right...

snapper41 6th Feb 2024 17:41


Originally Posted by pba_target (Post 11591636)
Easy to forget the assessment at the end where they decide the RAF are probably right...

But still called him an ‘RAF prick’…


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:18.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.