PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Brize ILS (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/588905-brize-ils.html)

cessnapete 30th Dec 2016 11:07

Brize ILS
 
I heard a Voyager recently holding for weather improvement at Brize. Wx just below CatI, about CatII.
The Voyager/A330 comes CatIIIC equipped 'out of the box' from the factory, as presumably the A400.
Is our premier RAF transport airfield not equipped for low vis procedures/CatIII ILS?

MaximumPete 30th Dec 2016 11:29

It may well be that the aircraft was full Cat III but the crew were not qualified or not current to carry out a Cat III approach.

cessnapete 30th Dec 2016 11:54

Cat III /low vis operations are part of the normal A330 Conversion . Crews qualified in the Sim. A few practice landings down route and you're done?
Perhaps the RAF only train to CatI. Seems a waste of modern technology, with for example, all the disruptions caused by fog etc.

vascodegama 30th Dec 2016 11:59

Short answer to your question cessnapete-NO.

BEagle 30th Dec 2016 12:07

Years ago, the northern perimeter road was relocated as a prelude to upgrading the aerodrome infrastructure to cater for TriStar LVPs and autolands.

Then someone realised that local topography, roads and other features would also need to be taken into account - which was deemed to be a very expensive move, given the relative infrequency of the need to work below Cat 1 limits...

There've been various warnings about the Brize ILS in recent NOTAMs, so its use below Cat 1 would be doubtful - I don't know whether the TAP shows lower than Cat 1 limits though, as these days MoD's contribution to Air Safety is to hide the milAIP behind a paywall...:hmm:

GipsyMagpie 30th Dec 2016 16:54

To fly below cat I minima you need:

A suitably equipped aircraft

A suitably equipped airfield

A suitably qualified crew

An organisation with appropriate training manual and performance monitoring programming

Approval from the regulator for all the above.

The last is I suspect the problem. EASA regulations for below Cat I approached amounts to a massive manual (PART-LVO). Military regs from a quick search through the MAA...Zip, zilch. You cannot approve something you don't regulate. It might happen through another means that's not public of course

Exrigger 30th Dec 2016 18:40

Not being aircrew, I don't fully understand the EASA and Military terminology, however is the link below to RA2307 relevant to the subject, if not apologies for the intrusion.

https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...07_Issue_7.pdf

GipsyMagpie 30th Dec 2016 19:26


Originally Posted by Exrigger (Post 9625042)
Not being aircrew, I don't fully understand the EASA and Military terminology, however is the link below to RA2307 relevant to the subject, if not apologies for the intrusion.

https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...07_Issue_7.pdf

That's Rules of the Air which I don't think hits the spot for this thread. It's all about what's not there. There is a few things in the RA1300 series which covers related topics, just not Low Visibility Operations - doing Cat II/III approaches (eg PBN and RVSM - GPS navigation and accurate altimeters in (very) simple terms)

Exrigger 30th Dec 2016 19:38

Thanks GipsyMagpie for letting me know, I just thought IMC was another description for low visibility flying and that was the only RA in the series (other than the gliding section) that mentioned it, but as I said apologies for the intrusion.

More lookout 30th Dec 2016 19:45

Autolands and Brize....did someone mention Tristars😱

DIBO 30th Dec 2016 21:07

They can always do like these guys, divert to the continent (in this case divert from Mildenhall to Brussels)
http://www.luchtzak.be/forums/download/file.php?id=7158

SilsoeSid 30th Dec 2016 23:47

The above picture puts some truth in the story of a plane landing on a runway that the pilots thought to be very short .... but boy, was it wide :ok:

tmmorris 31st Dec 2016 14:53

Cat D RVR appears to be 800. Given the prevailing viz about 150m recently I can see the problem...

Peter G-W 31st Dec 2016 15:50

A330 is a Cat C ac.

tmmorris 31st Dec 2016 18:39

Cat C RVR the same, apols as I was relying on a former A320 FO sitting next to me...

NutLoose 31st Dec 2016 18:51


A330 is a Cat C ac.
So was the Tristar nearly after the Autoland incident mentioned earlier :E

dragartist 31st Dec 2016 19:04

Does FIDO not work these days?

I'll get me coat!

chevvron 1st Jan 2017 08:51

Was FIDO ever installed at Brize? I know it was at Manston and Blackbushe - you can still see the channels next to the runway at the latter.
I would have thought that with all those wooden gliders at Brize, it wouldn't have been advisable!!

NutLoose 1st Jan 2017 11:08

Brize if memory serves me correctly, I was told, had an electrically heated all weather runway, the USAF put it in at great expense then tried to sell it to the UK when they handed it back, U.K. Plc thought well we will get it anyway so refused to cough up for it.
The USAF then drove a caterpillar with its ground cutting blade dropped down the side of the runway tearing all the wiring to the heaters out, thus rendering the system scrap and denying the RAF a freebie.
Similar they offered all the American fridges and furniture etc from the quarters for free, however the tax man wanted the tax paying on it all, so rather than get something for free from the USAF, and facing a bill, they dug a pit, crushed it and buried it all.

Innominate 1st Jan 2017 11:08

Was FIDO ever installed at Brize?

I don't think so - it was mostly for Bomber Command and the three emergency runways (Manston, Carnaby and Woodbridge). I believe that Brize was primarily an aircraft storage unit, so it was unlikely to see landings in poor vis.


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:10.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.