PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Skies above Britain (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/583112-skies-above-britain.html)

Jayand 17th Aug 2016 21:03

Skies above Britain
 
What a good programme, good mix of aviation interests. Highlighting once again in an understated way the bravery and professionalism of UK SAR amongst the other excellent features.

Tankertrashnav 17th Aug 2016 21:59

I thought the SAR section was brilliant - is there an equivalent of the AFC for civvies? That woman (the "winch wench") deserved one. The Typhoon guys doing decompression training brought back memories of North Luffenham, but they should have shown the one when they make you hypoxic - that can be quite funny for the observer! Good programme - looking forward to the next one.

Anyone know what that old French job was right at the end?

Tiger_mate 17th Aug 2016 22:27

The French job that looked like a cross between a Beaver and a Lancaster was a Max-Holste Broussard.

BEagle 17th Aug 2016 22:27

Max Holste MH.1521 Broussard, based at White Waltham....:8

And yes, a very good programme, I thought.

Turning trousers have obviously come a long way since the things we wore in Gnat/Hunter days! But we regularly pulled 5G in the JP without them, even when there wasn't the current fitness obsession. Didn't seem to be a problem; neither was 7G in the Hawk (or 8G once in a Hunter T7...:eek:) - so I wonder whether there's some benefit from repeated exposure to G forces as well as the various straining manoeuvres taught nowadays? Although sustaining 9G is something very different, of course.

Tashengurt 17th Aug 2016 22:27

Ttn,
A Max Holste Broussard I believe.
It was good and the SAR crew were truly impressive.
Good to see a few familiar faces!

Tashengurt 17th Aug 2016 22:28

At least we all said the same!

TURIN 17th Aug 2016 22:45

Very impressive. The SAR bit had me holding my breath.

Best not tell the JB lot the BBC have made a good program. :E

Tankertrashnav 17th Aug 2016 22:48

Thanks guys - yes very like a Beaver head on, with a Lanc tail bolted on the back!

I remember pulling 6G in a JP without too much trouble without a suit when being flown by a display pilot. Wouldnt fancy it much now though!

Wycombe 17th Aug 2016 22:53

Good prog, particularly enjoyed the witty banter on the S92. They must be ex-mil.

NutLoose 17th Aug 2016 23:17

The lone Typhoon QRA jet scenario went through more colour schemes than a 70's airline disaster movie. :E

Good programme :)

Kudos to the winch wench



..

Wycombe 18th Aug 2016 06:48


The lone Typhoon QRA jet scenario went through more colour schemes than a 70's airline disaster movie
Realised the QRA event shown was "for exercise" as soon as a FRA/Cobham Falcon came into view.

Oldlae 18th Aug 2016 07:57

Most impressed with the SAR hangar, just thinking back to the Lee-on-Solent hangar when the rats were eating the seat belts.

VX275 18th Aug 2016 08:10


Originally Posted by Wycombe (Post 9477282)
Realised the QRA event shown was "for exercise" as soon as a FRA/Cobham Falcon came into view.


And wouldn't the call sign therefore be "Rushton" and not as the BBC had it "Rushden".
Not the only verbal slip either. How long have the RAF had 'Flight Lewtenants'?

TURIN 18th Aug 2016 08:17


How long have the RAF had 'Flight Lewtenants'?
Indeed. I couldn't have been the only one who yelled at the telly "It's LEFTENANT you pillock!"

handsfree 18th Aug 2016 08:56


Best not tell the JB lot the BBC have made a good program.
Oi ! I heard that TURIN.

Must agree though, excellent programme.
My esteem for the SAR crews has reached new heights and
why are people like the "winch wench" not given gongs by
outgoing Prime Ministers rather than the rabble that get them.

Tashengurt 18th Aug 2016 09:38

I was also thinking "medals!" But then I wondered if the crew themselves would welcome this or if it would be seen as a slight against their MRT colleagues who had found, secured and stabilised the casualty.
Just speculating, for all I know the MRT were as agog as the rest of us.

BEagle 18th Aug 2016 09:41

What was that strange morning conference thing with the Stn Cdr? Everyone standing around - is that some modern day 'motivation' idea? I know that Oma.....Stelios used to hold all easyJet meetings with everyone standing, so has that idea migrated across to the RAF?

Treble one 18th Aug 2016 10:19


Originally Posted by BEagle (Post 9477448)
What was that strange morning conference thing with the Stn Cdr? Everyone standing around - is that some modern day 'motivation' idea? I know that Oma.....Stelios used to hold all easyJet meetings with everyone standing, so has that idea migrated across to the RAF?


I thought they were standing to attention cos the Staish was in the room :OHe is a Group Captain after all :O

MightyGem 18th Aug 2016 10:26


I couldn't have been the only one who yelled at the telly "It's LEFTENANT you pillock!"
No you weren't. :) I was surprised by the lack of intemperate language by the SAR crew. Obviously no ex Army guys there. :)

sitigeltfel 18th Aug 2016 10:46

As it involved the Military, there was an all too predictably sneering review from....you know who!


Enough! Get me out of here! Preferably to somewhere more reassuring, such as, erm, the RAF Typhoon counter-terrorism base. This is where a select group of pilots who have been on £8m training courses are primed and ready to leg it on to hi-tech planes to deal with any unidentified craft in British airspace. When Nats can’t get a plane to communicate with them, we rely on this lot to sort it out by scrambling jets in a matter of minutes. Once there, they trail them for a bit then waggle their wings theatrically, before flying up beside them and revealing their massive missiles like some kind of aggressively militaristic mating call. If this doesn’t work, then the prime minister makes a call on whether or not to blast them out of the sky. Theresa May is on holiday right now, and Boris Johnson is in charge. Just a thought.
The show did its best to ramp up the drama, but actually there was precious little. The unidentified plane that wandered into Gatwick’s flight path and forced the cancellation of all arrivals turned out to be piloted by a plonker. The plane trailed by a Typhoon that refused to respond turned out to be a training exercise. Boring. Although probably for the best, no matter how much the start of the third world war would have made for a more exciting hour of television.
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-r...me-out-of-here

The Fat Controller 18th Aug 2016 11:39

Some good bits, but terrible editing, difficult enough for aviation professionals to follow but impossible for the the man on the street.

crablab 18th Aug 2016 12:30

It was certainly good, as people have said the voice over was...interesting! SAR had me agog - the length those guys go to, puts the infringer at Gatwick to shame when you have these guys 100nm North!

I wish they'd covered a bit more of the ATC side, perhaps that is to come? I've always wanted to know how these controllers manage to deal with the huge volumes of traffic...

just another jocky 18th Aug 2016 12:58


Originally Posted by BEagle
But we regularly pulled 5G in the JP without them, even when there wasn't the current fitness obsession. Didn't seem to be a problem; neither was 7G in the Hawk (or 8G once in a Hunter T7...http://cdn.pprune.org/images/smilies/eek.gif) - so I wonder whether there's some benefit from repeated exposure to G forces as well as the various straining manoeuvres taught nowadays? Although sustaining 9G is something very different, of course.

And we can pull 6G without the aid of a g-suit too, but as you rightly suggest, instantaneous G is relatively easy, it's sustained G that is difficult, hence the extra PT and G-straining manoeuvres.

I think they know what they're doing! ;)

crablab 18th Aug 2016 13:09

Also, is it just me or is the statement from the NATS lady at the beginning: "all aircraft that are receiving an ATC service over England and Wales are getting it from this room" substantially incorrect!?

Basil 18th Aug 2016 13:19


Originally Posted by sitigeltfel (Post 9477540)
As it involved the Military, there was an all too predictably sneering review from....you know who!

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-r...me-out-of-here

The writer: 'Tim Jonze is the music editor of guardian.co.uk. You can follow him on Twitter at @timjonze'
Think I'll give it a miss :rolleyes:

P.S For anyone thinking of commenting in the Graun; I understand that deviation from the Party Line will have you banned and your comment deleted.

Basil 18th Aug 2016 13:30

All very impressive.
I've stood in Swanwick and watched the workload increase as a line of Cb passed through.
Needless to say, envied the fighter jocks and was mega impressed by the decision making and execution of the mountain rescue. Loved the way the casualty grabbed the first part of the chopper which came within reach.

Basil 18th Aug 2016 13:34

Hey! Just had a thought re rotor blade proximity to obstructions.
What about a laser ranging array just under the rotor to give visual and audible warning?

212man 18th Aug 2016 14:03


Hey! Just had a thought re rotor blade proximity to obstructions.
What about a l@ser ranging array just under the rotor to give visual and audible warning?
What - like this one? AgustaWestland Helicopter Obstacle Proximity LIDAR System - Aerossurance

sharpend 18th Aug 2016 15:24

I agree that the winch operator deserves a medal. She, and the others, were incredibly brave. They decided it was unsafe to go to where the walker was, but when told that the walker would die if the did not, they risked their own lives anyway. I watched that program and was amazed and full of admiration.

Basil 18th Aug 2016 15:55


Originally Posted by 212man (Post 9477777)

Buggah! Too late again!

ifonly 18th Aug 2016 15:59


And wouldn't the call sign therefore be "Rushton" and not as the BBC had it "Rushden".
Not sure - I've been told two different things:-

I was told it was something to do with Alan Cobham's association with the village of Rushden in the 1930s.

Also told it was something to do with Tarrant Rushton.

Basil 18th Aug 2016 16:03


Originally Posted by airpolice
if not for the guys in the Local and doing Director

Isn't some Director done remotely and I noticed a report about remote Local too.
British airports consider replacing air traffic controllers with remote system

Il Duce 19th Aug 2016 13:03

Basil, maybe so however, as Crablab wrote, the statement is substantially incorrect. There will have been dozens of aircraft ouside controlled receiving an ATC service which wasn't supplied by Swanwick and dozens inside controlled airspace (around Manchester, Birmingham, East Midlands etc) that weren't receiving an ATC service from Swanwick.

wub 19th Aug 2016 14:57

The Rushton Winch was fitted to Canberras for target towing - a service provided today by FR Aviation

99 Change Hands 19th Aug 2016 14:57


I don't know where she worked in RAF ATC but it seems it didn't have a LARS function. Long before the Flight Lootenant comment, I was reeling from her claim that Swanwick do everything.
She was at Marham in the early 80's.

BEagle 19th Aug 2016 16:02

At least the programme showed what chaos can be caused by an unknown puddlejumper blundering into controlled airspace....

Yet there are still some GA pilots who think that an infringement doesn't really matter if it didn't actually affect anyone else at the time....:mad:

beefix 19th Aug 2016 16:44

Wub
Not quite right. Delmar high speed winch with the Rushton target. Many years ago I used to sit in the back of Meteor TT20s and operate the system. In case you are wondering, 1574 Target Facilities Flight , RAF Changi.

Rgds SJH

MPN11 20th Aug 2016 12:33

Right ... thank you BBC iPlayer. All the above comments now make sense!!!

I enjoyed the programme, and whilst I could pick a few inaccuracies and unnecessary embellishments (Typhoon victory rolls, anyone?) I think it served the British Public quite well.

Basil ... Scampton Director was operated from the Wadington Approach Room in the 80s, but I accept that's not quite what's being discussed.

beefix ... 1574 of fond/distant memory, with their rather smart black tail-fins IIRC ;) They enabled me to claim I controlled Meteors on my first 2 tours in ATC :)

NDW 20th Aug 2016 15:15

An excellent programme and I echo the above comments ref the Coastguard crews, absolutely fantastic and I always enjoyed watching them whilst they were training here at Norwich.

Question that I had been meaning to ask and I don't at all mean this to be insensitive at all, but I noticed the Flt Lt who I assume appeared to suffer from Alopecia flying in the Typhoon. I'm presuming the RAF allow FJ Pilots and any Aircrew to continue flying? I (as a civvy and outsider and one who stands to be firmly corrected) only thought that the lack of eyelashes/eyebrows etc would possibly cause issues with sweat whilst flying?

I must admit, upon looking at the RAF medical requirements - I from what I recall, never saw alopecia on the list as a bar to entry.

Merely curious and as I say - don't wish to sound or come across insensitive.

Thanks.

FantomZorbin 20th Aug 2016 15:35

Ifonly
RUSHTON was used as a c/s by aircraft flying for Flight Refuelling out of Tarrant Rushton flying targets for the "Thursday War" with the RN et alia.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:02.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.