PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Luftwaffe escort for the Queen (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/563505-luftwaffe-escort-queen.html)

Martin the Martian 24th Jun 2015 09:35

Luftwaffe escort for the Queen
 
I see that a pair of Typhoons (oops EF2000s) escorted the Queen and Prince Philip into Berlin yesterday. Nice touch, but what a shame that our Head of State has to use a chartered aircraft on official business. Frau Merkel can choose from a pair of A319CJs, two A330s or four Global 56000s when she comes to visit. I presume that 32 Sqdn were busy, or does the RAF not get involved in flying the Royal family around these days, unlike other Commonwealth air forces?

Exascot 24th Jun 2015 09:50

It's an absolute disgrace.

Did they make their 'doors time'?

Wander00 24th Jun 2015 10:21

Not a million miles so that a long haul aircraft was required. She'll be in the front of a rented Chipmunk next, although she might quite like that

Wander00 24th Jun 2015 10:39

Sprintman - nice one!

BEagle 24th Jun 2015 10:48

Martin the Martian, A340-300s, not A330s.

No doubt the beancounters (and miserable anti-royalists) would prefer the Queen to fly on a LoCo airline - QueenyJet?

Or perhaps Monarch would be an obvious choice ;) ?

darkroomsource 24th Jun 2015 10:53

Can't please everybody.
If she was flying in a military plane, people would complain about the cost to the taxpayer.

P6 Driver 24th Jun 2015 10:56


If she was flying in a military plane, people would complain about the cost to the taxpayer.

Possibly not so many complaints if it was down the back in a C-130.

Biggus 24th Jun 2015 11:00

Having seen how she arrived at the 2012 London Olympics, surely she could have gone over in a C-130 and simply jumped out the back? :ok:

NutLoose 24th Jun 2015 11:08

I suppose they couldn't put the Lanc on for her as it's not fixed yet :}

sharpend 24th Jun 2015 11:14

Yes, totally agree. Though I am completely biased, when we flew HM and PM we did everything completely perfectly, even down to opening the doors to the second exactly in the correct place for the red carpet. I watched the first time HM flew with BA. They overshot the carpet and were not on time.

Heathrow Harry 24th Jun 2015 11:18

but think of the savings!!

TBM-Legend 24th Jun 2015 11:21

The BBMF Dakota or Easy Jet I'd say...

Exascot 24th Jun 2015 11:39


even down to opening the doors to the second
Sharpend, this was THE aim after flight safety.

Standards :(

TBM-Legend 24th Jun 2015 12:01

Of course the other option was to simply drive the Royal coach and horses into a C-17 and voila transport in Berlin

rh200 24th Jun 2015 12:16

Isn't there an airworthy B17 in pommy land. Give her a lift in that, been a while since they where seen in the skies of Germany:E

P6 Driver 24th Jun 2015 13:01


Yes, totally agree. Though I am completely biased, when we flew HM and PM we did everything completely perfectly, even down to opening the doors to the second exactly in the correct place for the red carpet. I watched the first time HM flew with BA. They overshot the carpet and were not on time.
I recall suffering some of those long distance 0.000017mph taxying feats from the comfort of a control tower.

Exascot 24th Jun 2015 13:27

P6 Driver Not from me, it was all sorted out in the air. Very unprofessional on the ground. I can't imagine any of my colleagues at the time doing this either. Also no 50kt taxing. If you get to that you have lost it. High speed turns on the ground and you have got ADCs and PPOs trying to kit up with swords and shooters respectfully all over the cabin :eek:

PAXfips 24th Jun 2015 13:34

http://img.pr0gramm.com/2015/06/24/e7d8f34a79b2ab45.jpg

CoffmanStarter 24th Jun 2015 13:40

I always thought that when Her Majesty arrived somewhere 'foreign' in a British VC-10 of the RAF, it was all quite magical. If a civilian aircraft was required ... then Concord was the next best thing.

What a shame ...

NutLoose 24th Jun 2015 14:10


Yes, totally agree. Though I am completely biased, when we flew HM and PM we did everything completely perfectly, even down to opening the doors to the second exactly in the correct place for the red carpet. I watched the first time HM flew with BA. They overshot the carpet and were not on time.
"'Er luv, it's not time, go and plonk yer butt and i'll tell ya when it's time to get orf" ;)

Do you think she misses the top of the toilet polished to a mirror finish, as was done on the VC10?

Exascot 24th Jun 2015 14:32

It was Concord that Sharpend mentioned earlier that overshot the red carpet, had to fit the tug and push it back. Guess BA Captains don't have a chinagraph in their nav bag to make marks on the DV window on departure to line up eye with position of said carpet.

They should have left the job to the guys who did it all the time. No disrespect, like anything else it takes training and practice.

The whole operation is only like a timed bombing run. The IP is landing then you have to get the dividers onto the taxiway charts and work out the time for taxying and of course know even which way you are parking on the stand to get to target. It took 30secs to turn a VC10 gently through 180°.

pr00ne 24th Jun 2015 15:26

Multi millionaire celebrity hires biz jet.
Why is this news?

Ascoteer 24th Jun 2015 16:30

The Royal Family aren't entitled to abated cost travel by 32(TR) Sqn assets due to a grant they receive each year from DfT for their travel. They thus have to pay full cost (the cost of airfield, wages, fuel, gate guards etc etc) which makes it cheaper to rent a civilian jet.

Plus they're less likely to break down.

BEagle 24th Jun 2015 16:37


The Royal Family aren't entitled to abated cost travel by 32(TR) Sqn assets....
So in that case, why are 32 still 'TR' Sqn?

I did like the tale of the Princess Royal who, when travelling somewhere by CivAir, was told of an ATC strike which would delay her. With a twinkle in her eye, she simply said "Off with their heads!", before waiting patiently for the flight to depart.

Exascot 24th Jun 2015 16:50

Ascoteer. It is 20 years since I was last in this game which was for most of my time in the Royal Air Force. We never broke down, as you put it, on a Royal or VVIP flight.

Costings were very complex and involved 'creative accountancy'. Even then the PM would sometimes use another 'company'. Good PR of course for the lower tender.

Ascoteer 24th Jun 2015 18:11

...
...

...

NutLoose 24th Jun 2015 18:37


Ascoteer. It is 20 years since I was last in this game which was for most of my time in the Royal Air Force. We never broke down, as you put it, on a Royal or VVIP flight.

Costings were very complex and involved 'creative accountancy'. Even then the PM would sometimes use another 'company'. Good PR of course for the lower tender.
Blimey, I remember a few that cut it close, like fitting the VIP fit on the spare on route to pick up the VIP, it was pulled out of the primary and thrown across to the secondary aircraft freight door to freight door.

Maggie came back on two, I suppose that wasn't really broken down, only slightly :cool:

sharpend 24th Jun 2015 19:48

We VVIP chaps have many tales to tell.

At the top of drop, the Nav set his watch time exactly from his comprehensive nav kit. He then advised the pilots of timings, distance and even down to where to turn off the runway and what speed to taxi at, always remembering the phrase 'Safely, Smoothly and On Time'. In that order.

I remember taking Prince C to Riyadh once and we opened the doors exactly abeam the red carpet and to the second. Shortly after HRH departed in the Limo a very irate British colonel appeared on the flight deck to demand why we were 10 minutes early. I asked him what time he had on his watch and when did he last set it. His face went bright red and that was that. Stupid man.

sharpend 24th Jun 2015 19:54

We also NEVER BROKE DOWN.

At Saudi, with HRH, my slats failed to extend on finals. Sadly we did not have the tools to fix the problem before departure the following day; with HRH. The rules were thus a single fight back to home base with crew only. Sadly, BZZ could not get the spare VC10 to us in time due to the lack of diplomatic clearances.

But we had to take HRH to Bahrain the following day.

My solution? Make Bahrain my home base and make HRH crew. It worked, though HRH did appear on the flt deck to ask if he was getting crew pay.

True!

Whenurhappy 24th Jun 2015 20:13

Great photos, and great elan from the Luftwaffe. I'd love to have been a fly in the cabin and hearing Philip's comments!

The Royal couple are the same age as my parents, if they were still alive. As was pointed out by observers during the recent State Opening of Parliament, requiring nonagenarians to travel on such a regular basis and to carry out a pretty arduous programme would be tantamount to abusive behaviour! Well done that they can do still do so.

baffy boy 24th Jun 2015 21:43

Aren't there restrictions on how close to a Royal Flight another aircraft can get? Guess not looking at the picture but it seems a bit strange.

hoofie 25th Jun 2015 04:02

Was Prince Philip holding on to a pair of imaginary Brownings and shouting "Dagga Dagga Dagga !" out of the window at the Luftwaffe pair ?

Less Hair 25th Jun 2015 10:53

So G-THFC stands for "Tottenham Hotspur Football Club" as it is/was Daniel Levy's aircraft?

Exascot 25th Jun 2015 11:03


my slats failed to extend on finals.
Hope you are better now Sharpend :E

ian16th 25th Jun 2015 11:53

A quote:

The UK is the only G20 nation not to have a dedicated long range Head of State/Government aircraft like France's A330 or Germany's two A340s.
From:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_tr...and_government

Sad :sad:

melmothtw 25th Jun 2015 11:54

Hard times for the Monarchy indeed - a luxury private jet to Berlin, and I hear also that the Queen might have to move to one of the 4 other stately London abodes while Buckingham Palace is refurbished (which, incidentally, those dastardly Scots might refuse to help pay for). Oh, the humanity!!

BEagle 25th Jun 2015 12:25

Enjoy your time in the Tower as raven fodder, melmothtw....:sad:

melmothtw 25th Jun 2015 12:30

:ok:












.

Heathrow Harry 25th Jun 2015 13:28

the Queen doesn't travel enough by air these days to warrant a specific "Queens Flight".

I'm sure some of the army of lesser Royals would love one tho'

Cameroon travels by BA and they rent a 777 so they can get the journo's on and charge them squillions for the ride

Harry Lee always used to fly SQ scheduled when he could


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:43.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.