PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Falklands defence review after military deal between Russia and Argentina (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/553644-falklands-defence-review-after-military-deal-between-russia-argentina.html)

LowObservable 14th Jan 2015 20:51

People. This was the Latin American equivalent of April Fool. Can we just kill it?

http://www.blackgate.com/wp-content/...akes-lucy1.jpg

Bannock 10th Feb 2015 14:08

Argentina Ramping up as we dumb down - 1982 all over again ?

Argentina set to sign deal for Chinese corvettes

Interesting about the focus on ASW,

Visiting Beijing between Feb. 3-5, President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner of Argentina is set to sign an agreement with China to increase the military-to-military cooperation between two nations, according to the UK-based Jane's Defence Weekly.
Under the agreement, China North Industries Corporation will help Argentina produce a version of the VN1 wheeled armored personnel carrier, while China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation will help develop various types of naval ship.
China is understood to have introduced five of its P18 export corvettes to Argentina. A source from the Argentine government said the vessels are estimated to cost US$50 million each.
Known as the Malvinas-class after the Argentine name for the Falkland Islands, the five offshore patrol vessels each carry a 76 mm main gun, two 30 mm cannon, eight anti-ship missiles and two triple torpedo launchers. The 1,800-tonne ship can also carry a medium-sized helicopter. Argentina has requested a larger flight deck to handle its Sea King helicopters and towed sonar to increase the vessel's anti-submarine capability. Two of the corvettes will be built in China while the other three will be co-produced in Argentina. The P18s may be delivered started in 2017 according to Jane's.
If the agreement is signed as expected, it should be considered a major step in Argentina's efforts to revive its military power with help from China. The agreement may also help China open a new market to export its military aircraft.
Source: China Times.

Also interesting is the rapid delivery dates mentioned.

Heathrow Harry 10th Feb 2015 14:46

talks about talks...............

China to supply Argentina five "Malvinas Class" offshore patrol vessels ? MercoPress

MP is quite good on the Argentinians

" Since the 1982 Falklands War, China has expressed its support for Argentina's continued claims over the Falklands, which Beijing compares to its claim over Taiwan. However, China's willingness to accept commodity payments to finance initial loans that fund military sales has been key to its military sales success in Argentina.

In 2011 the Fábrica Argentina de Aviones (Argentine Aircraft Factory: FAdeA) reached an agreement to start co-producing China's Changhe Z-11 light helicopter. Then, in June 2013, FAdeA sources told IHS Jane's that talks over co-production of the Chengdu FC-1 lightweight jet fighter had occurred over the previous two years.


This option appears to have been lost as Argentina has tried and failed to purchase retired Dassault Mirage F1 fighters from Spain, then refurbished Israeli Aircraft Industry Kfir fighters and, in late 2014, Saab Gripen fighters co-produced in Brazil.


However, the new Argentine-Chinese defense agreement could revive prospects for combat aircraft co-operation. In addition to the FC-1 fighter, China could offer low-cost combat-capable supersonic lead-in trainers like the Guizhou JL-9G/FTC-2000G or the Hongdu L-15."

Bannock 10th Feb 2015 15:19

Maybe we should be buying from China also. We can call them Thatcher Class. We are paying £348 million (US $584 million) for three OPVs armed with nothing more than a spud gun.

BAE, UK Government Settle Agreement on New Patrol Vessels | Defense News | defensenews.com

Old rubber face Kircher is getting 5 for $50 mill each and packing more heat than a Type 23.:{

Heathrow Harry 10th Feb 2015 15:22

they're purely to keep people in work

but in general we never seem to be able to get as many armaments on a vessel as other people

Bannock 10th Feb 2015 21:04

"they're purely to keep people in work"

If thats the case how about this.
Option A - Buy 6 armed to the teeth foreign built OPVs/Corvettes for about $300 million.
That leaves $284 million in the pot. Bus the ship yard workers the 45 mins to Rosyth and put them to work on the Carriers. Net result -twice as many OPVs, Carriers delivered early, skilled workforce retained, and money left in the Jar to pay for the Navy s Increased need to fund more Flight deck cocktail parties every weekend.

Option B -Buy 6 armed to the teeth foreign built OPVs/Corvettes for about $300 million. Give each BAE shipworker a mega golden hand shake and tell them to do one. With the remaining $200 million give it to India to pay towards their P8 MPA program. Simples

melmothtw 24th Apr 2015 16:30

So to those who dismissed the proposed Su-24 deal between Russia and Argentina as a Latin American April Fools, any suggestions as to how/why it's come up again?

Argentina and Russia In Strategic Partnership Deal

Frostchamber 24th Apr 2015 16:55

Probably because the story continues to chug along in much the same vein, and the phrase "Among them could potentially be a deal for..." suggests that substance-wise things remain pretty much where they were. I've not been one putting this in the April Fool category, but I'll take more interest if and when the fine words show real signs of translating into buttered parsnips.

Gsxr600 24th Apr 2015 20:10

Totally off topic but I came across an article somewhere that Argentina reached advanced stages in buying 12 used Vulcan bombers in 1978, but it was blocked at the last minute. The irony is amazing.

CAW 24th Apr 2015 22:46

They were actually two Vulcan bombers.

The british files that show the interest of the argentinean air force have been uploaded to the web for no less than three years now.

No deals have been sealed in Russia this time. Fear not.

Gsxr600 25th Apr 2015 10:29

CAW, can you recall where you saw that, I only read about it on a museum website which was only about a one sentence comment, and was interested in knowing a bit more about it?

CAW 25th Apr 2015 16:43


CAW, can you recall where you saw that
Sure, my friend. Here it is:

Reemplazo de los legendarios Canberra | Página 4 | Foros Zona Militar

Page 4, post 69.

:ok:

ShotOne 25th Apr 2015 17:23

If the Chinese are prepared to accept payment in corned beef, then good luck to them. If the Argentine treasury was given a dollar for every speculative story about a new fighter/warship they might have enough money to keep their existing ships from the repo-man.

Gsxr600 25th Apr 2015 19:10


Sure, my friend. Here it is:

Reemplazo de los legendarios Canberra | Página 4 | Foros Zona Militar

Page 4, post 69.
Thanks, that's a very interesting read. They were actually after 6 to 12 Vulcan in 1982 of all years. Imagine if they had been sold them, might have made a difference to the outcome of the war and who knows they might still be in service.

Fitter2 27th Apr 2015 08:53


Imagine if they had been sold them, might have made a difference to the outcome of the war and who knows they might still be in service.
Yes, we might have had to use what we had (Nimrod, better systems, more range and sensible bombload) for Black Buck instead. I would have been interested to hear the results of a Sea Harrier v Vulcan combat.....:D

AndySmith 27th Apr 2015 09:02

I believe that the events were already overtaking the introduction of the Vulcan into Argentine service, had agreement been reached.

This weekend I will be seeing an engineering Argentine officer who would have been part of the team that would have involved in this purchase, he previously had been involved in the Dagger acquisition from Israel (and a very interesting story that is too - for example they had asked all the aircraft to be stripped and repainted - they did the first and the rest were just overpainted). I will see if I can find out more.

TEEEJ 27th Apr 2015 15:42

AndySmith wrote


...they did the first and the rest were just overpainted
IAI Dagger wreckage in the Falklands showing the remains of the Israeli IAI Nesher markings.

http://modelingmadness.com/review/mod/fr/calmp3e.jpg

Air Pictorial, I think it was, had some images of the following Dagger cockpit section? The Israeli "kill" markings were visible on the side where the paint had flaked off.


September 1, 1998
BUENOS AIRES - A Falkland islander found the wreckage of an Argentine fighter jet shot down in the war with Britain in 1982 and police are trying to determine whether remains found inside are the pilot's, the British Embassy said Monday. A spokesman said a hotelier chanced across the wreckage and alerted the military, who handed the matter over to police. Argentine media said the plane was an Israeli-made Dagger fighter shot down in May 1982 by a British Harrier.
Falkland Islander Finds Wreckage Of A Fighter Jet - tribunedigital-orlandosentinel

Lonewolf_50 27th Apr 2015 16:07

Would I be correct in assuming that the deal to buy some Kfirs from Israel has gone bust?

Lyneham Lad 29th Jul 2015 15:21


Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50 (Post 8957853)
Would I be correct in assuming that the deal to buy some Kfirs from Israel has gone bust?

It seems not...
Argentina in negotiations for Israeli Kfir fighters

Rhino power 29th Jul 2015 15:37


Some aircraft are being offered with General Electric J79 engines with zero hours following a complete overhaul
I would've thought the US would put the bung in on that one?

-RP

Lonewolf_50 29th Jul 2015 17:13


Originally Posted by newt (Post 8801804)
Put Russian pilots in them and it may be a different story! This all stems from the US poking Putin in the eye with a big stick ie oil price! It's going to get much more difficult to see where the real threat is coming from!

It ain't the US poking him in the eye with oil prices, it's the Saudis. They ended up poking no few Americans in the eye with it, along the way, as the local shale exploration boom has closed up lately.

Heathrow Harry 30th Jul 2015 15:02

the Saudis are intent on proving to the BANKERS who invest in Shale oil that they should read the small print - the oil buiness knows the price goes up and down like .. (fill in inapropriate pharse here)........

Next time round the cost of investment will be significantly higher, which the Saudis like - plus it stops/slows the spread of fraccing elsewhere

then it's one in the eye for the Iranians as well

the colateral damage to Mr Putin and people like Venezuala is pure icing

and of course it reminds the White House just who are the US's "oldest friends" in the region -especially as they'll follow through with some large orders for airliners, military hardware and infrastructure

Lyneham Lad 10th Mar 2016 17:00

Argentina and Israel resume Kfir sale talks
 
On Flight Global:-

Argentina and Israel have resumed negotiations covering the potential sale of 14 Israel Aerospace Industries Kfir Block 60 fighter aircraft, after the parties broke off talks following elections in the South American country in October 2015.

Up until that point, all indicators pointed to a likely contract signature in November.

The Block 60 aircraft, previously operated by the Israeli air force, are the latest upgraded version of the indigenous fighter that has been flying for 40 years.

It is powered by GE Aviation J79 engines and will carry an Elta 2032 active electronically scanned array radar and will have an open architecture to allow the customer to install other systems.

Kfir jets are in service with the air forces of Sri Lanka, Ecuador and Colombia.
And the money will come from???

Marcantilan 11th Mar 2016 00:37


And the money will come from???
This is the third time the conversations are resumed...

Apparently, they like to talk to each other.

27mm 12th Mar 2016 12:42

With a single, very thirsty J79, it'll have short legs. No amount of Elta avionics is going to make up for that. Not sure if it's AAR capable.....

cokecan 12th Mar 2016 19:05

it seems unlikely that, given the number of 'deals' that various countries (not least the Israelis..) have done with Argentina over the years that have subsequently foundered, the Israelis have not ensured that the money does infact exist..

the Kfir airframe certainly is AAR capable, whether these particular examples are is another question - interesting of course that in another current purchace, the Argentine AF is buying a pair of KC-130's. its possible its a coincidence of course, and it may well come to pass that these aircraft won't be delivered with AAR, but i'm not sure i'd put much cash on it.

Heathrow Harry 13th Mar 2016 09:40

I'd be interested to know if the new Govt have signed up for this -as they are desperately trying to get the books back in shape after the gross misspending of the Kirchner years.

The military may have said that they have to have SOMETHING and so the loose change in the bottom of the desk drawer has been scraped up and the only thing that is available at the price are some very old Kfirs - a 40 year old design based on a 65 year old design............

cokecan 14th Mar 2016 12:02

the Kfir deal has been floating about for 3 or so years to my recollection, it may even pre-date the Spannish F1 deal that had actual Argenine pilots actually flying Spannish F1's in actual Spain - the suggested reason it fell through was that the French refused to grant the Spannish permission to sell them to Argentina.

the cynical might wonder if that was because the French had their own F1's they wanted to unload, or because the French did us a favour. the very cynical might wonder if it was both...

it seems, to me, very unlikely that the Israelis would continue with this merrygoround without being very sure that both the money, and the intent, was available - and i rather doubt this latest press release would have occured if the new government wasn't on board.

A_Van 14th Mar 2016 13:56

I think it was not serious back in 2014 about acquiring old Russian Su-24. A year later there were similar rumors about a similar deal with the Chinese that did not materialise either :
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/558226/China-Argentina-falkland-islands-fighter-jets


It looks like Argentina first has to define the goals. Why do they need tactical bombers or, more general, attack aircraft? To attack Falklands? Sounds not serious because a single Patriot battery will keep them pretty far away. Attack the ships as they did (with a certain success) back in 1982? In this case they first have to find (where to buy) modern anti-ship missiles since "good old" Exocets are now really outdated. Aircraft (if any) would then be considered only in the context of (capability of) carrying those missiles. And Kfirs do not carry anti-ship or cruise stuff, do they?

NutLoose 14th Mar 2016 14:06


Quote:
Peter we the Russians have much much more hardware and manpower that the UK so they can and will show their strengths.

A big difference is that the UK is a member of NATO and does not just rely on its own military for defense. The UK can rely on the entire NATO defense structure. Russia on the other hand has few friends and essentially has to go it alone.
We would never start a war with Russia as we simply do not have the facilities to house all of the prisoners.


..

A_Van 14th Mar 2016 14:16

NutLoose, is Argentina part of Russia? I did not know .... Keep joking, the guy you are quoting is perfectly right ;)


As for the topic, if Argentina manages to buy Russian anti-ship missiles (even with scaled down range to meet the international treaty) it would be a head-ache for UK, indeed.

cokecan 14th Mar 2016 14:21

from recall the Argentines have mooted, signed, or back away from, deals over US F-16's, French Mirage 2000's, Kfirs, Spannish F1's, Brazilian Gripen, Russian SU-24, something Chinese, and now we're back to Kfir.

its certainly easy to say that if they've not bought anything yet then they aren't going to, but we know that the Spannish deal went a long way down the track, and we know that this is the second bite of the Kfir cherry - i fail to see why, given that track record, the Isrealis would even bother replying to emails if they weren't sure the money existed.

sitigeltfel 16th Mar 2016 06:47

I see the Argies have sunk a Chinese fishing boat they allege was illegally fishing in their waters.

Argentina sinks Chinese fishing boat Lu Yan Yuan Yu 010 - BBC News

Could get interesting!

Martin the Martian 16th Mar 2016 10:44

So did they sink them with the warning shots? Need to work on the targeting I think, or look up the definition of 'warning'.

And I guess that will be Argentina off Beijing Christmas card-yes of course we'll sell you cut price armaments list.

In the meantime, updated Kfirs versus Typhoons. Ooh, that's a tough one...

cokecan 16th Mar 2016 14:02


In the meantime, updated Kfirs versus Typhoons. Ooh, that's a tough one...

it is - right up to the point where its 16 Kfirs vs 4 Typhoons, the Typhoons don't have a divert, and the Typhoons have to protect incoming cargo and passenger aircraft and ships that don't have SAM's.

how do four Typhoons cope with a co-ordinated action where SIGINT catches a deliberate sniff of a pair of Kfir and a tanker hanging around the approach route from ASI 500 miles north of MPA, another pair with a tanker are hanging around 100 miles SW of W Falkland, and then we see another pair, or even two pairs, bore in at 500kts on a direct heading from the NW?

how do four Typhoons cope with that our friends do it 4 days running?

melmothtw 16th Mar 2016 14:07


how do four Typhoons cope with a co-ordinated action where SIGINT catches a deliberate sniff of a pair of Kfir and a tanker hanging around the approach route from ASI 500 miles north of MPA, another pair with a tanker are hanging around 100 miles SW of W Falkland, and then we see another pair, or even two pairs, bore in at 500kts on a direct heading from the NW?

how do four Typhoons cope with that our friends do it 4 days running?
Meteor.....?

Tourist 16th Mar 2016 14:19

That's easy.

Don't try to do it with Typhoon.

There is often an SSN in that part of the world...

Stanwell 16th Mar 2016 14:32

... coming soon to an air base near you. :cool:

(My point there is that an SSN, appropriately equipped, can caushttp://www.pprune.org/images/buttons/edit.gife interruptions to your planned sorties)
.

Tourist 16th Mar 2016 14:37

Why would you defend merchant shipping with an aircraft?

Far better to make the point that Argentinian shipping is far more vulnerable.....

This is a silly discussion. One of the things the Falkland war proved is that the Argentinians are one of the sadly limited number of countries who play rigidly to the rules and fight wars honourably. You think they are going to go off shooting down civvy airliners and shipping?

A_Van 16th Mar 2016 16:31

Sorry for a stupid question, but is it really just a group of 4 Eurofighter aircraft there (I do not count Hercules and VC10)? Patriots seems to be an obvious complementary stuff that would fix potential holes in the defence perimeter.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:11.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.