Why the States?

Because thats where the owner is from.

And he has a rather impressive collection of toys too :ok:

Fighter Factory | Fighter Factory

GeeRam, thanks for education me today, much appreciated.:ok:

Thanks for posting the photograph Samuel. It's currently my computer wallpaper.

If BBMF were ever to get a Mossie it should surely be flown by the fighter pilots - after all, it was the first truly multi-role fighter bomber. Most importantly, it should be kept away from test pilots - their record with historics is very poor.

The Mosquito is the aircraft Jerry Yagen is most proud of. No great surprise you would think, but he acquires aircraft by the month and 95% of those in his museum are flown regularly. He bought 4 new aircraft in September alone.

The museum is, in my opinion, the finest of its type in the world and the airshows are amazing. It's very accessible, no ropes or barriers at all.

As I said, the Mosquito is his pride and joy - even when put against his Spitfire, Hurricane, Mustang, B17, Ju 52, incoming Me 262, FW190 and so many more. He is an Anglophile and has many British aircraft and other toys/accessories such as WWII armoured vehicles, telephone boxes, post boxes, uniforms and more. He also has a V1 (and has run the engine) and an enigma machine.

Seeing is believing, the best time to visit is for the Warbirds Over The Beach airshow held every May. The Canadian Lancaster is normally there too.

Hard sell over!

Thank you, Samuel. Well worth watching even if the envy factor was at its highest reading. :ok:

Droll, very droll . . .

What a cracking video - thanks SO much.

"Sadly the Mosquito is destined for a home in the USA"

As much as everyone would like to see it in the UK, Australia, NZ,
I think we should be thankful someone in this world stumps up a
huge amount of money to get one airworthy and airborne, even if
it ends up in the US.

Thank for the notes of appreciation, but having been at the initial display and felt the enthusiasm for this wonderful aircraft and the people who flew it, I had a 'feel-good' factor which just had to be shared.

So fill yer boots!:ok:

Dave Phillips at work!
 

I always thought the Mossie had a control column rather like that in the Canberra, ie a pair of spectacles, not a joystick as here. Obviously this can't be true in all marks, happy to be corrected though.

MB

Hrrmphhh... Just another twin engined aircraft!!!

Just another twin engined aircraft my foot. I can understand why some folks might rate it above the Hurricane or Spitfire but being British I would say we owe those two aircraft so much but to me the Mosquito comes a very, very close fourth or maybe equal third favourite aircraft of all time and how I wish the BBMF had one of these iconic aircraft.

Thank you VERY much for the link and long may that aircraft grace our skies although what a great pity that America has once again stole a march on us :ok::ok::D

I believe that the bomber variants had the spectacle control yoke, and a split windscreen. Does anybody know why the difference?

Bomber pilots have both hands on the controls, while fighter pilots use one hand for something else. ;)

Ah, the age old who'd fly a BBMF Mossie question raises it's head again. Bomber boys? Experienced on twins and mostly QFI or Ex QFI or the Fighter boys, the FB.6 was a fighter bomber after all and the next boss flys twin engined fighters..:E

Just watched the whole video from beginning to end.
Wow - what an aircraft - and what a sound...
Been fascinated by it since I were a lad and built the Monogram kitset.
Thanks Samuel.

The prototype had spectacles but Fighter Command wanted the conventional fighter stick. Many pilots preferred the spectacle since it gave more leverage and the aircraft was more agile. The flat windscreen was bulletproof, and a flat plate due gun sight aiming difficulties through the Vee windscreen. Flat screen gave higher drag though.

A reason oft given, but historians say it was due to the interference of the rear most stack with the radiator. The radiator extended the leading edge of the wing 22 inches further forward than that of wing on the outboard side of the engine. The 5 stacks also identify the engine as a single stage version, the two stage was 9 inches longer and were able then to have the 6 individual stacks.

Bombers were usually powered by two stage and fighters by single stage engines.

Comparison of fighter and bomber cockpits All info from respected historians, graphic from "Great Book of WWII Airplanes".

http://i101.photobucket.com/albums/m...am227/P132.jpg

The Mossie and Vamp.
 

What great news.
A thing of beauty is a joy forever.
My Pop flew NF 30s and F4 Vamps after the war with 502 ( Ulster ) Sqn.
He loved the Mossie because of its performance from the ground all the way to the top and the Vamp because it was like driving a sports car.
Interestingly he loathed the Meteor which despatched several of his oppos.
He loved the F Mk. 22 Spitfire the best, the lucky bastard.

Per Ardua Ad Lounge Bar:cool: