PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Turkish F4 "Vanishes" (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/488684-turkish-f4-vanishes.html)

Green Flash 24th Jun 2012 17:07

OK, with NATO (ie the US) holding Turkeys coat (Int, Satelite and all manner of non-kinetic happenings) who would win between Turkey and Syria? For the sake of argument lets say the establishment of a no-fly zone a la northern Iraq including GBAD assets. Escalation play would be blockade of all Syrian ports. Could Turkey stick one on Assads boys? :confused:

glojo 24th Jun 2012 17:26


Originally Posted by ORAC
An airspace violation is just that, it is not an act of war. The deliberate shooting down of the aircraft when it was back in international airspace was and is specifically covered in the NATO Charter.

I think claiming this military aircraft was shot down over International waters might be speculation and so far both sides have only agreed that this aircraft had at the very least been in Syrian air space, the location where it was actually hit is still open to debate.

Japanese airliners, U2 aircraft, this is hardly the first incident if its type and if you want to go 'walkabouts' there is a price to pay.

Did Turkey cooperate when forces from NATO countries wanted to invade Northern Iraq from the Turkish borders?

ORAC 24th Jun 2012 17:33

Depends if the Turks are looking for a casus belli, and who is willing to support them.

glojo 24th Jun 2012 17:40

Good point but will there be any volunteers?

My own thoughts are there is very little chance of that happening and Russia needs that warm water port. Turkey has now learnt a very expensive lesson and how very sad that two people might have had to pay the ultimate price for this act of brinkmanship.

hetfield 24th Jun 2012 17:47


very sad that two people might have had to pay the ultimate price for this act of brinkmanship.

Turn your speaker on and listen...

Fox3WheresMyBanana 24th Jun 2012 18:01


To attack what? To achieve what? For what purpose?

Turkey's real agenda?

Turkey blames Syria for supporting Kurdish rebels, inches closer to military action - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper

CargoOne 24th Jun 2012 19:36

pr00ne


To attack what? To achieve what? For what purpose?
No idea, but exactly the same was done in Libya a few month ago. Now everything is the same except small details - Syria don't have enough oil to support export. Maybe JDAMs are too expensive for this kind of country then...

AlphaZuluRomeo 24th Jun 2012 20:33

The incident as viewed by the turkish side (source of graphics = turkish air force radar) :
TÜRK UÇA

(edit: let the video play, I don't understand turk, but graphics are legended in english if you're a bit patient)

LS-4 24th Jun 2012 21:36


Originally Posted by sandozer
Looks like Pantsyr-1 was the culprit.

How reliable is that website anyway?

racedo 24th Jun 2012 22:24

Turkey allowing SFA to base itself there and be supplied by Saudi's so lots more to add into the mix.

At this point in time a calm down is more appropriate but whether that will happen is unknown.

salad-dodger 24th Jun 2012 22:47


but whether that will happen is unknown
very insightful

S-D

LS-4 24th Jun 2012 22:52

There hasn't been any word on the ELT, has it?

By the way, does anyone know if the type is equipped with an FDR of some sort, and if so, does it record RWR data?

GreenKnight121 25th Jun 2012 05:32


Originally Posted by Krakatoa
LS-4
"......we were not allowed within 5 miles of a Soviet warship......"
Not in my day. Must have been a different Cold War.

LS-4 has his location listed as Canada... they played by different rules than the Aussie/US forces.

BEagle 25th Jun 2012 07:22

There was one 35 Sqn Vulcan captain who declared war on the Russians. One day the Kiev was passing close to the UK in international waters; our secondary role was 'maritime radar reconnaissance' (aka 'boat spotting'), so off he went full of aggression, having entered in the auth sheets the words:


Locate and identify enemy shipping
He then proceded to bring back several shots of the Kiev taken at slow speed on the F95, with his overflight taking a number of frames.....and he flew rather more than a single pass. Surprised Russian sailors could be seen staring skyward, wondering WTF was going on.

After they'd recovered from the shock, the MRR cell showed our warry hero the JSP regulations for flight in the vicinity of Russian ships, all of which he had comprehensively broken. The auth sheet entry was removed and destroyed, the boss 'had a word' and the rest of us merely agreed that this particular captain was barking...

TEEEJ 25th Jun 2012 11:28

The Syrian Foreign Ministry spokesman has revealed that the aircraft was downed by anti-aircraft fire and not by a radar-guided missile.


BEIRUT (Reuters) - Syrian air defenses had to react immediately to a Turkish jet flying at 100 meters altitude inside Syrian airspace in what was "a clear breach of Syrian sovereignty", Foreign Ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi said on Monday.

"Syria reacted to the breach," he told a news conference about the incident on Friday. "We had to react immediately, even if the plane was Syrian we would have shot it down," he added.

Makdissi said the jet -- a Turkish airforce F4 Phantom -- was shot down by anti-aircraft fire, not by a radar-guided missile. Despite the incident Syria remains committed to a "neighborly relationship" with Turkey, Makdissi said.
News Headlines

Red Line Entry 25th Jun 2012 12:55

To be pedantic, a Syrian Ministry spokesman has claimed, rather than revealed. Truth is the first casualty and all that...

I do love the 'even if it were Syrian we would have shot it down' bit - clearly, a kill's a kill!

sandozer 25th Jun 2012 14:17

Not very judging by the latest "news" it was shot down by AA fire less than 1.5 miles from Syria.

Lonewolf_50 25th Jun 2012 15:34

ORAC

The point being that, in shooting it down in international airspace, Syria conducted an act of war to which Turkey is entitled to respond and to ask for help from the rest of NATO. The total destruction of all Syrian SAW and AD airfields might be an apposite response.
or, a valid defense of territorial waters/airspace. Granted, most nations operate under the protocol of warning before shooting, but maybe the Syrians are in the right here.


krakatoa

--
"......we were not allowed within 5 miles of a Soviet warship......"
Not in my day. Must have been a different Cold War.
Heh. I was well within 5 miles numerous times. Good fun. Got mooned a few times for my troubles.

BEIRUT (Reuters) - Syrian air defenses had to react immediately to a Turkish jet flying at 100 meters altitude inside Syrian airspace in what was "a clear breach of Syrian sovereignty", Foreign Ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi said on Monday.
"Syria reacted to the breach," he told a news conference about the incident on Friday. "We had to react immediately, even if the plane was Syrian we would have shot it down," he added.
Makdissi said the jet -- a Turkish airforce F4 Phantom -- was shot down by anti-aircraft fire, not by a radar-guided missile. Despite the incident Syria remains committed to a "neighborly relationship" with Turkey, Makdissi said.
This looks like a variation on the rule "squawk or die." Back in the 80's, in the Med, off the coast of Lebanon, that was roughly the rule I had to adhere to when launching off of our ship's deck. If Mode IV was not responding, I put me arse back down on the deck until our crypto was up and sweet. This was as defense against our own people and their surface to air tools, both missiles and that fun little robot known as CIWS / R2D2. An ounce of prevention, and all that.

Red Line:

To be pedantic, a Syrian Ministry spokesman has claimed, rather than revealed. Truth is the first casualty and all that... I do love the 'even if it were Syrian we would have shot it down' bit - clearly, a kill's a kill!
So that's where those F-15 pilots ended up, the ones who shot down the Black Hawks. They are now consultants to the Syrian MoD. :E

As to Turkey's response to Syria, and Syria harboring Kurds ... the Turks have ventured into Northern Iraq more than once since the Americans showed up, and since the various Iraqi governments have been in place. All to hammer down on one Kurdish faction or another.

My point is: Turks are not at war with Iraq. Turkish troops running about in Syria chasing Kurds need not be a cause for war, but the Syrian government would have to be on board (which IIRC the Iraqi government was for a while). The odds of Assad and friends being supportive? Low to nil.

LS-4 25th Jun 2012 16:24


Originally Posted by GreenKnight121
LS-4 has his location listed as Canada...

You might be mistaking me for Fox3WheresMyBanana..

During the Cold War, the only wings I had were those of my diapers.

tonker 25th Jun 2012 17:17

Video claiming to be people on a beach watching the F4 being shot down..

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5b8_1340635536


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:41.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.