Dam Busters: The Race to Smash the German Dams
just noticed on BBC2 @ 11:20 i.e. NOW!
|
Just noticed your post, thanks and have now rescheduled 'Yes Prime Minister' :)
I see that they experimented off of Chesil Beach! Not far from here.. |
Thanks, flicked over.
|
8 weeks to develop the bomb?!
It'd be 8 years nowadays! |
Milo, thanks for letting us know.:ok:
Interesting and sober programme. "We went under the wires ... which were just above the bridge"! |
now in iPlayer
BBC iPlayer - Timewatch: Dam Busters: The Race to Smash the German Dams Amazed by the comment "We were at thirty feet and Les Munro flew underneath..." and the fact that one aircraft had ten attempts at the Sorpe |
From the title I thought we were setting up to have another go?!
|
Has to be the best presentation of all. Well done James Holland.
|
And some shot in the library of the RAF Club :)
|
Wouldn't know, never been there......
....but apparently the breakfast is great! Dambuster programme safely recorded for eventual leisurely enjoyment. |
Nice to see clips of Halifax & Stirling thrown-in for good measure.
|
Originally Posted by diginagain
(Post 10798291)
Nice to see clips of Halifax & Stirling thrown-in for good measure.
However, a very decent summation of Op CHASTISE for the uninitiated. No mention of a dog. |
With the mention of James Holland, please may I bring this to our attention? https://www.patreon.com/wehaveways/p...ag]=Discussion
|
Originally Posted by MPN11
(Post 10798357)
No mention of a dog. |
Originally Posted by Green Flash
(Post 10798504)
With the mention of James Holland, please may I bring this to our attention? https://www.patreon.com/wehaveways/posts?filters[tag]=Discussion
|
Originally Posted by Green Flash
(Post 10798504)
With the mention of James Holland, please may I bring this to our attention? https://www.patreon.com/wehaveways/posts?filters[tag]=Discussion
|
I think this was a repeat showing. Certainly at the end it showed a copy right date of 2001(?)
In any event, a good programme about great aviators! Thanks BBC |
Originally Posted by Pontius Navigator
(Post 7215435)
And some shot in the library of the RAF Club :)
|
For a Service that counts attaining Air Superiority as a sine qua non, the RAF post WWII seems to have a blind spot regarding the Bombing Offensive against the German Reich. That Holland shares its view is a matter for him, but to suggest that Wallis did too, simply because of Upkeep and Tallboy is really gilding the lily. Harris believed in area bombing true. But what else could take the war to Germany? No amount of pickle barrels could provide precision bombing in any modern sense. Certainly some weapon systems (mainly Wallis's) provided for precision attacks by day but at considerable cost, and even then shared the beneficial effects that Harris's Old Lags achieved by bludgeoning Germany night after night, together with the USAAC by day. The concentration of flak, and day and night fighters, in the Reich denuded the Eastern and later on the Western Fronts of Air Defence. That slippery charmer, Speer, admitted it was the second front, so by D-Day we are talking four fronts, and counting.
Bomber Command was a war winning weapon system, achieving air superiority in the East and the West for the Allies, and finally in the skies above Germany itself. Harris may have believed that Strategic Bombing could win the war alone, he certainly implied that it might, but he had to fire the bellies of those Old Lags that he sent out night after night with resolve. He was poorly treated by Churchill and by his own Service. 55573 of his command paid the ultimate price, but not in vain. You don't win wars by being nice, you do so by destroying your enemy's ability to wage war. That is what drove Harris and he should be given the credit for his share in final victory. As to the programme (first tx in 2011 I believe), very good, but could be better I'd say simply by praising Upkeep without the knee jerk need to damn the Bombing Offensive (though the Beeb will never do otherwise I fear). |
Originally Posted by Chugalug2
(Post 10799382)
For a Service that counts attaining Air Superiority as a sine qua non, the RAF post WWII seems to have a blind spot regarding the Bombing Offensive against the German Reich. That Holland shares its view is a matter for him, but to suggest that Wallis did too, simply because of Upkeep and Tallboy is really gilding the lily. Harris believed in area bombing true. But what else could take the war to Germany? No amount of pickle barrels could provide precision bombing in any modern sense. Certainly some weapon systems (mainly Wallis's) provided for precision attacks by day but at considerable cost, and even then shared the beneficial effects that Harris's Old Lags achieved by bludgeoning Germany night after night, together with the USAAC by day. The concentration of flak, and day and night fighters, in the Reich denuded the Eastern and later on the Western Fronts of Air Defence. That slippery charmer, Speer, admitted it was the second front, so by D-Day we are talking four fronts, and counting.
Bomber Command was a war winning weapon system, achieving air superiority in the East and the West for the Allies, and finally in the skies above Germany itself. Harris may have believed that Strategic Bombing could win the war alone, he certainly implied that it might, but he had to fire the bellies of those Old Lags that he sent out night after night with resolve. He was poorly treated by Churchill and by his own Service. 55573 of his command paid the ultimate price, but not in vain. You don't win wars by being nice, you do so by destroying your enemy's ability to wage war. That is what drove Harris and he should be given the credit for his share in final victory. As to the programme (first tx in 2011 I believe), very good, but could be better I'd say simply by praising Upkeep without the knee jerk need to damn the Bombing Offensive (though the Beeb will never do otherwise I fear). |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.