PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Dam Busters: The Race to Smash the German Dams (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/486619-dam-busters-race-smash-german-dams.html)

Milo Minderbinder 28th May 2012 22:18

Dam Busters: The Race to Smash the German Dams
 
just noticed on BBC2 @ 11:20 i.e. NOW!

glojo 28th May 2012 22:34

Just noticed your post, thanks and have now rescheduled 'Yes Prime Minister' :)

I see that they experimented off of Chesil Beach! Not far from here..

NutLoose 28th May 2012 22:38

Thanks, flicked over.

Farfrompuken 28th May 2012 22:44

8 weeks to develop the bomb?!

It'd be 8 years nowadays!

Evening Star 28th May 2012 23:26

Milo, thanks for letting us know.:ok:

Interesting and sober programme.

"We went under the wires ... which were just above the bridge"!

Milo Minderbinder 28th May 2012 23:47

now in iPlayer
BBC iPlayer - Timewatch: Dam Busters: The Race to Smash the German Dams

Amazed by the comment
"We were at thirty feet and Les Munro flew underneath..."

and the fact that one aircraft had ten attempts at the Sorpe

parabellum 29th May 2012 02:03

From the title I thought we were setting up to have another go?!

PPRuNe Pop 29th May 2012 10:13

Has to be the best presentation of all. Well done James Holland.

Pontius Navigator 29th May 2012 10:43

And some shot in the library of the RAF Club :)

Biggus 29th May 2012 17:45

Wouldn't know, never been there......









....but apparently the breakfast is great!






Dambuster programme safely recorded for eventual leisurely enjoyment.

diginagain 31st May 2020 12:06

Nice to see clips of Halifax & Stirling thrown-in for good measure.

MPN11 31st May 2020 13:35


Originally Posted by diginagain (Post 10798291)
Nice to see clips of Halifax & Stirling thrown-in for good measure.

... and a Manchester, if my eyes did not deceive me.
However, a very decent summation of Op CHASTISE for the uninitiated.

No mention of a dog.

Green Flash 31st May 2020 17:05

With the mention of James Holland, please may I bring this to our attention? https://www.patreon.com/wehaveways/p...ag]=Discussion

diginagain 31st May 2020 17:38


Originally Posted by MPN11 (Post 10798357)

No mention of a dog.

Probably wise at this moment in time...

diginagain 31st May 2020 17:42


Originally Posted by Green Flash (Post 10798504)
With the mention of James Holland, please may I bring this to our attention? https://www.patreon.com/wehaveways/posts?filters[tag]=Discussion

But why the imitation M65 jacket and Indiana Jones MkVII gas-mask bag?

MAINJAFAD 31st May 2020 19:34


Originally Posted by Green Flash (Post 10798504)
With the mention of James Holland, please may I bring this to our attention? https://www.patreon.com/wehaveways/posts?filters[tag]=Discussion

Fantastic Find, the whole lot is here https://play.acast.com/s/wehaveways/...1-57e2090ca3dc

bobward 31st May 2020 20:10

I think this was a repeat showing. Certainly at the end it showed a copy right date of 2001(?)

In any event, a good programme about great aviators!

Thanks BBC

rolling20 31st May 2020 21:28


Originally Posted by Pontius Navigator (Post 7215435)
And some shot in the library of the RAF Club :)

Pontius, I daresay like yourself , I am looking forward to getting back into the club again. Last time I was in the library they were doing an index check. Interfered with my snooze somewhat!

Chugalug2 1st Jun 2020 18:18

For a Service that counts attaining Air Superiority as a sine qua non, the RAF post WWII seems to have a blind spot regarding the Bombing Offensive against the German Reich. That Holland shares its view is a matter for him, but to suggest that Wallis did too, simply because of Upkeep and Tallboy is really gilding the lily. Harris believed in area bombing true. But what else could take the war to Germany? No amount of pickle barrels could provide precision bombing in any modern sense. Certainly some weapon systems (mainly Wallis's) provided for precision attacks by day but at considerable cost, and even then shared the beneficial effects that Harris's Old Lags achieved by bludgeoning Germany night after night, together with the USAAC by day. The concentration of flak, and day and night fighters, in the Reich denuded the Eastern and later on the Western Fronts of Air Defence. That slippery charmer, Speer, admitted it was the second front, so by D-Day we are talking four fronts, and counting.

Bomber Command was a war winning weapon system, achieving air superiority in the East and the West for the Allies, and finally in the skies above Germany itself. Harris may have believed that Strategic Bombing could win the war alone, he certainly implied that it might, but he had to fire the bellies of those Old Lags that he sent out night after night with resolve. He was poorly treated by Churchill and by his own Service. 55573 of his command paid the ultimate price, but not in vain. You don't win wars by being nice, you do so by destroying your enemy's ability to wage war. That is what drove Harris and he should be given the credit for his share in final victory.

As to the programme (first tx in 2011 I believe), very good, but could be better I'd say simply by praising Upkeep without the knee jerk need to damn the Bombing Offensive (though the Beeb will never do otherwise I fear).

rolling20 1st Jun 2020 20:41


Originally Posted by Chugalug2 (Post 10799382)
For a Service that counts attaining Air Superiority as a sine qua non, the RAF post WWII seems to have a blind spot regarding the Bombing Offensive against the German Reich. That Holland shares its view is a matter for him, but to suggest that Wallis did too, simply because of Upkeep and Tallboy is really gilding the lily. Harris believed in area bombing true. But what else could take the war to Germany? No amount of pickle barrels could provide precision bombing in any modern sense. Certainly some weapon systems (mainly Wallis's) provided for precision attacks by day but at considerable cost, and even then shared the beneficial effects that Harris's Old Lags achieved by bludgeoning Germany night after night, together with the USAAC by day. The concentration of flak, and day and night fighters, in the Reich denuded the Eastern and later on the Western Fronts of Air Defence. That slippery charmer, Speer, admitted it was the second front, so by D-Day we are talking four fronts, and counting.

Bomber Command was a war winning weapon system, achieving air superiority in the East and the West for the Allies, and finally in the skies above Germany itself. Harris may have believed that Strategic Bombing could win the war alone, he certainly implied that it might, but he had to fire the bellies of those Old Lags that he sent out night after night with resolve. He was poorly treated by Churchill and by his own Service. 55573 of his command paid the ultimate price, but not in vain. You don't win wars by being nice, you do so by destroying your enemy's ability to wage war. That is what drove Harris and he should be given the credit for his share in final victory.

As to the programme (first tx in 2011 I believe), very good, but could be better I'd say simply by praising Upkeep without the knee jerk need to damn the Bombing Offensive (though the Beeb will never do otherwise I fear).

John Strachey, who Harris tried to have removed from his post at the Directorate of Bombing Operations due to his communist leanings, was the post war Under Secretary of State for Air and is assumed to have snubbed Harris for an honour and thus BC as a whole. Harris was determined to continue his way and that way was lost after the Battle of Berlin. When BC came under the control of Eisenhower in April 44 it achieved great success in destroying transportation and invasion targets. It has long been held that Harris should have been dismissed in the winter of 44, when he returned to the destruction of cities, but there was not the political will to do so. Air superiority in the west won by the USAAF with their long range Mustangs and the attrition of the German day fighter force. So what of the men who flew and died for BC? My family and my wife's family lost members in the service of BC. My adjutant was an X BC man. No one can or should attempt to tarnish their resolve and courage. To go and fly night after night in the face of overwhelming odds, in my opinion ,should mean everyone of them deserves a VC.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.