PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   New Gen AirShips - Hybrid Air Vehicles, UK (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/463101-new-gen-airships-hybrid-air-vehicles-uk.html)

t43562 8th Aug 2012 16:49

I don't know the P-791's dimensions but it also has a payload of 20 tons. Both companies are apparently working on 50 ton models for a Canadian customer so you may see larger ones if things go well.

t43562 9th Aug 2012 23:13

Official Northrop Grumman First flight video
 

iRaven 10th Aug 2012 21:35

Well done NG, you've flown a balloon in a similar manner to those that have flown for 100+ years :D

Whoopie bloomin' do! :ugh:

The program will be scrapped inside 2 years when they learn the lessons of all those that have gone before...

iRaven

t43562 26th Aug 2012 10:44

LEMV First flight - coming in to land
 
This sequence shows the LEMV coming in to land.


Trim Stab 26th Aug 2012 13:57

I pity the poor fecker who has to fly that - 3 mins from short finals to touchdown, with no fast-forward button.

Not to mention having to suffer the septic nerds yelling "yeehooo" every ten seconds or so. Have they no dignity?

Lima Juliet 26th Aug 2012 17:07

I note that they are flying on pretty still days - what's going to happen when it's 20G38kts+ ? :eek:

...hello, is that the scrap man? I have a load of old mecchano that I no longer need...

:p

t43562 24th Oct 2012 19:19

Airship Programs - Not So Bouyant, Says GAO
 
Airship Programs - Not So Bouyant, Says GAO

BEagle 24th Oct 2012 20:20


Are airships back? Our guess - maybe not...
Never a truer word. The bolleaux spouted by airship snake oil salesmen needs to be robustly challenged at every opportunity.

Lima Juliet 24th Oct 2012 23:31

Here is the official US Govt report:

http://www.gao.gov/assets/650/649661.pdf


LEMV is a technology demonstration project, expected to develop a hybrid prototype airship for ISR purposes in a forward combat environment. The project was initiated in response to an urgent need request. The Army is supposed to complete system level development and testing within the United States within 18 months after contract award (June 2010) and be ready for transport to Afghanistan for a joint military utility assessment and follow-on demonstration. The required on-station duration time is 21 days at an altitude of 20,000 feet. Pending the results of the joint military utility assessment and other reviews and evaluations, the Army will determine whether or not to pursue a program of record.
According to the program office, the LEMV hybrid airship is scheduled to undergo 33 manned flights totaling approximately 500 hours. The Army successfully launched and recovered LEMV during its first flight in August 2012. The initial date for deployment was January 2012; currently, the deployment date is indefinite. LEMV development is behind schedule 10 months (representing about a 56 percent schedule increase) due to issues with fabric production, getting foreign parts through customs, adverse weather conditions causing the evacuation of work crews, and first time integration and testing issues. Also, LEMV is 12,000 pounds overweight because it has weight issues with sub-systems, such as tailfins, exceeding weight thresholds. According to the program, the increased weight reduces the airship’s estimated on-station endurance at an altitude of 20,000 feet from the required 21 days to 4 to 5 days, representing at least a 76 percent reduction However, current plans, according to program officials, call for operating the airship at 16,000, feet which should enable on-station duration time to be 16 days with minimal impacts to operational effectiveness (other than about a 24 percent reduction to on-station endurance). The biggest risk to program development is the ambitious schedule of 18 months. The Army identified a fiscal year 2012 funding shortfall of $21.3 million resulting from the need for additional engineering and production support to mitigate and resolve technical issues at the LEMV assembly facility.
I hate to say it...:E

...I F***ing well told you so! :=

LJ

PS See you back on the forum in 15 years time when some bright spark 'invents' the concept of airships all over again. :ugh:

iRaven 25th Oct 2012 00:08

Message for Governor Romney:

"Try asking Mr President why he has wasted $Ms on 'experimental' airships - doesn't he know that the nature of conflict has changed? Not only do we not use bayonets and horses anymore - we shouldn't try to use airships as well!!!" :ugh:

Yup, the snake oil salesmen at Cardington have done it again :D (at least for another 10 years, anyway).

iRaven

chopper2004 5th Nov 2012 08:35

The Search of Bigfoot continues.....with the help of a blimp
 
What caught my eye of the article preview, was they put a pic of the LEMV

Idaho scientist seeks to launch aerial Bigfoot search with blimp - Yahoo! News UK

chopper2004 5th Nov 2012 08:36

The Search of Bigfoot continues.....with the help of a blimp
 
What caught my eye of the article preview, was they put a pic of the LEMV

Idaho scientist seeks to launch aerial Bigfoot search with blimp - Yahoo! News UK :E:cool::ok:

Courtney Mil 5th Nov 2012 10:25

With good range and short landing perfomance, these will be the back-up plan when F-35B goes wrong. We're gonna need a bigger boat.

walter kennedy 5th Nov 2012 17:22

Modern Elmo hits the nail on the head with <<In regard to the helium problem: the only airship proposals I can take seriously are ones which don't require helium to be dumped in order to descend and land.>>
The obvious advantage of airships is that the aircraft itself can be neutrally buoyant - needing no power other than a little for trim, altitude change, and modest speed - the catch is the weight of fuel to be consumed in a flight and that anything other than relatively (to the aircraft itself) insignificant payloads are carried - heavy payloads would require a lot of thrust (and therefore fuel) to lift or unload or large adjustment of gas (dumping or compression, both I would suggest impractical).
The Zeppelins carried (correct me if I'm wrong) a small mass of passengers relative to the mass of the airship, from prepared point to prepared point, and used readily available hydrogen. They would be very vulnerable to adverse weather (eg icing R101 - can you imagine de-icing kit for a large airship?).
Moving hundreds of tons to FAFs - I don't think so.
Long range recce (a role with fixed payload) at modest speed - definitely.
Another investor con, I reckon.

Ian Corrigible 24th Oct 2013 03:55


Originally Posted by Leon Jabachjabicz
hello, is that the scrap man?

Sadly prescient...

SMDC: "Hello, is that Hybrid Air Vehicles? This is the U.S. Army...yes, those folks who spent $297 million on that balloon thingy. Long story short, we don't need it, so how about you give us $44 million for it?"

HAV: "Hmm, that's a bit steep. How about $301,000?"

SMDC: "Sold."

I/C

500N 24th Oct 2013 03:59

As they say, deals like that come along once in a lifetime.

Those in Australia will remember Alan Bond / Kerry Packer Channel 9 deal
and buy back.

t43562 24th Oct 2013 04:57

I think that's great news because it gives the HAC a chance to develop improvements and demonstrate the vehicle.

Naysayers do like to crow but to me it seems rather like being a music critic who can't compose music. Countless billions have been sunk into a lot of the technologies to get them to work that seem "safe" now but they were not always. Stopped prematurely they might have seemed like a bad idea too.

jolihokistix 24th Oct 2013 05:43

Ballast problems? Worth reminding ourselves of the R101 disaster in 1930.
R101 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

BEagle 24th Oct 2013 07:21


"We learned quite a bit from the technology," said John Cummings, an Army spokesman. "In the end, it was determined not to pursue it."
Indeed. It didn't work......:rolleyes:

Let's hope that this will be the last time that some airship snake oil salesmen promote the idea of their gasbags for military forces.

Perhaps the grunts have also discovered the effect of W/V on TAS? oo-rah...:bored:

Haraka 24th Oct 2013 13:42

Not to mention G/S Beags :E.....:8


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:19.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.