PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Tactics, how would Vulcan attack USSR ? (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/428056-tactics-how-would-vulcan-attack-ussr.html)

coldair 20th Sep 2010 09:10

Tactics, how would Vulcan attack USSR ?
 
Hi Guys,

not seeking any classified info.

How would the Vulcan fleet have attacked Russia ? Would it have been in several formations, or would each one have taken different routes using ECM ?

I'm sure we would have got through, just as likewise they would have but I'm interested in the tactics we may have employed.

Cheers guys,

Coldair ( A Vulcan lover )

barnstormer1968 20th Sep 2010 09:28

Hi Coldair.

I know very little on this...Too young and no need to know etc, but you could always read up on how dummy attacks were made against the USA to get some idea on one way it could be done.

Getting there was one thing, but having any chance of getting home, or having a home to return to was another.

Pontius Navigator 20th Sep 2010 10:03

Coldair,

It is set out in Peter Hennesey's book, The Secret State, in which you will find diagrams etc.

Essentially the force would depart simultaneouly from its main and dispersal bases and would not form up in any form of formation. They would however generally concentrate in time and space to present a narror front when they penetrated the littoral defences. The idea would be to saturate the SAM and fighter system on a very narrow front which hopefully would achieve local air superiority during the penetration.

The USSR was well aware of this potential and attempted to plug any gaps it determined. On one occasion there was a gap of about 12 miles; they filled this gap with 2 SA3 batteries narrowing the gap to less than 5 miles. It was still assessed that the batteries would be shot-out before the bulk of the force squeezed through.

Although aircraft were given time-on-target to +/- 3 minutes there was no such timing constraint on the initial penetration; things would have been quite exciting.

Yellow Sun 20th Sep 2010 11:31

You may wish to browse this thread on another site. It contains quite a lot of information relevant to your question.

YS

Al R 20th Sep 2010 11:49

PN/YS,

How was Special Wpn security maintained at these (I assume) quiet dispersal bases? If SW15 was maintained for up to 30 days at a stretch, where was the compromise made between a robust, physical security and a discrete, low profile?

Pontius Navigator 20th Sep 2010 12:25

Al, in the 60s the requirement was for a single RAFP on each aircraft so there would be two continuously of duty on a 2 ac dispersal and 4 on a 4ac dispersal. At both dispersal and main base this would be agumented by airmen armed with pick axe handles.

In those days there was no acknowledged threat from Spetznaz or 5th columnist and airfield boundary fences were more suited to keeping stray sheep out than intruders.

Al R 20th Sep 2010 12:29

:eek: .. blimey.

Ta.

sisemen 20th Sep 2010 13:33


airfield boundary fences were more suited to keeping stray sheep out than intruders.
Don't know about Waddo et al but at Scampers and Finningley that would be a forlorn hope (keeping the sheep out I mean). Looking back on it, and comparing it to the angst of IRA days, one wonders how the hell we got away with it.

Gainesy 20th Sep 2010 13:44


not seeking any classified info.

How would the Vulcan fleet have attacked Russia ?
Classic!:D:)

BEagle 20th Sep 2010 14:04

Ah yes, Al R, but said RAFP would also have had a hungry woolly alligator, plus an SMG and probably a pistol as well with which to hold off the red hordes!

Just our luck to be allocated the 'shape' on a Strike Force Dispersal exercise once - we arrived at Finningley before the RAFP guards did. Playing the 2-man principle thing, we 2 pilots stayed in the cockpit whilst the 3 rear crew walked to the perimeter, then 2 of them came back on board leaving just 'Mongo', our Nav Radar, to fight off all comers with just his 9mm Browning, threatening voice and 'imposing presence'!

It really was a bit Dad's Army at times - but what fun times they were!

Although our gallant groundcrew, having once successfully nabbed an intruder, had to be advised that using locking wire to tie his thumbs to the chain-link fence whilst making him stand on tip-toe in his shreddies was perhaps taking things a bit too far!

Pontius Navigator 20th Sep 2010 14:19


Originally Posted by BEagle (Post 5945512)
using locking wire to tie his thumbs to the chain-link fence whilst making him stand on tip-toe in his shreddies was perhaps taking things a bit too far!

On a bent banana base in Germany, during a Taceval in a typical German winter, a group of Bundeswehr were held at the Gymnasium and left outside with nothing on except a hood, their tops and their long johns (if worn). One of the wives rang in to complain of these semi-naked men outside the Gym.:}

I also caught a 'dead' OC OPs, under his desk taking the telephone call from his wife.

Tankertrashnav 20th Sep 2010 16:10

Was never on bombers (by the way Coldair [a Vulcan lover] have you ever heard of Victors and Valiants, they were part of the V Force too?) but even on tankers there was one aspect of our war role which was highly classified.

Even at this distance in time I am unsure if this has now been declassified, so my natural inclination is to err on the safe side and say nothing. I dont expect regular updates from the MOD along the lines of "you can now talk about ..." but in general terms how do we know when it's safe to go public?

racedo 20th Sep 2010 17:01

One of the reasons for NOT declassifying stuff even years later is that in future you never know when you may be required to reinstigate plans like this.

No matter how stupid it seems there could always come a time in needing to do something like this. Letting the plans become public you may highlight a weakness that someone was unaware of and plugs.

Once you have allowed a strategy to become public knowledge someone may be able to guess latter stages by looking at what you have done in early stages.

minigundiplomat 20th Sep 2010 17:25


Once you have allowed a strategy to become public knowledge someone may be able to guess latter stages by looking at what you have done in early stages.
There's a strategy to what we do? When did that happen?

Jimlad1 20th Sep 2010 17:39

Of course there is a strategy MGD - how else do you think things in the forces got this bad? We couldnt have screwed up this badly without a strategy!

Be careful mind, now you've started talking about strategy, you'll be getting ideas above your station and expecting to see a plan. My ROE allow for the use of deadly force in that eventuality (or rather, following MOD cutbacks, allow me to point a pistol at you, pull the trigger and watch as a big 'BANG' flag unfurls in your direction...) :E

Saintsman 20th Sep 2010 18:00


and watch as a big 'BANG' flag unfurls in your direction...
Flag?

In my day we had to shout 'Bang'.....

Fareastdriver 20th Sep 2010 18:05


but even on tankers there was one aspect of our war role which was highly classified.
As a tanker pilot when the hooters went and the mess corridors were aloud with thumping feet I used to turn over and secretly go back to sleep.

Pontius Navigator 20th Sep 2010 18:13

FED, wot, no ACP?

Mike7777777 20th Sep 2010 18:19

How would a Vulcan attack the USSR? Low and fast?

Neptunus Rex 20th Sep 2010 18:24

Taceval
 
When 204 (Shackleton) Sqn was based at Honington, we had the national SAR task, and so were "excused Taceval." The best bit was that during Taceval, the Officers' Mess bar was open 24 hours a day. Better still, it was the nominated 204 Sqn refuge!

How we loved Tacevals and Minivals (apart from the duty SAR Crew, of course.)


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:11.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.