PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   F-35 Cancelled, then what ? (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/424953-f-35-cancelled-then-what.html)

typerated 23rd Jan 2018 05:24

Hi Transall,

I didn't realise there was a second batch of F-16's to replace the Mirages.
The F-16 was a great buy for Europe I thought - for the first time in the cold war the smaller countries were operating something head and shoulders better than the soviets had. Especially as the UK and Germany didn't get an F-16 or F-18 class aircraft.

I remember a package of over 30 Belgian F-16s hitting Spadeadam in the mid 90s on I think it was 'Brilliant Foil' exercise - one of the Elder Forrest UK air defence exercise replacements. Bet you would struggle to do that now!

You might buy more F-35s but I doubt it! You might get less!

Yes I totally agree about the demise of the RAF - it is just a little easier to see on a single type force though.

pr00ne 23rd Jan 2018 13:24

Just how could the RAF (not that they spend the money) actually have achieved better VFM at the time?
As there was a cash shortage it HAD to be on HP. There was not the amount of cash available for an up front purchase of 14 Airbus A330 aircraft, their conversion into tanker/transport configuration, simulators, new hangars, ground support equipment, training, maintenance and support. Now with 75% aircrew and over 50% groundcrew and contractor back up providing the rest, the RAF has a real meaningful capability.
What would you have cut at the time if you wanted to buy all that lot up front?

Davef68 23rd Jan 2018 14:11


Originally Posted by typerated (Post 10028544)
The F-16 was a great buy for Europe I thought - for the first time in the cold war the smaller countries were operating something head and shoulders better than the soviets had. Especially as the UK and Germany didn't get an F-16 or F-18 class aircraft.


Big difference being that the F16 didn't (initially at least) have a BVRAAM capability (That said, neither did the F-4F in that period!)

typerated 24th Jan 2018 06:33

Fair call Dave but...

Central Europe in the time period - how useful would BVR be after the first morning?

For the Norwegians over the arctic - definitely a lack of capacity! - they probably bought the wrong aeroplane really- but the Belgians and Cloggies on the central front?

ORAC 24th Jan 2018 09:12

Difficult to man a Kill Box without one.....

Davef68 25th Jan 2018 09:15

https://raf-beta-public.org/news/uk-...or-first-time/

Interesting they only use the pilots' first names.

Rhino power 26th Jan 2018 21:34

Why the Pentagon Isn’t Happy With the F-35
 
Looks like things are (still not) coming along nicely then... :hmm:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...er-s-criticism

-RP

George K Lee 26th Jan 2018 22:16

On the bright side, if you're a loggie or a wrench-turner you can look forward to a lifetime of employment.

Turbine D 27th Jan 2018 01:00

More on the bright side, it takes off, flies and lands resulting from 16 years of development, what more can one expect?

Heathrow Harry 27th Jan 2018 13:43

"In the testing office’s annual report to Congress on major weapons systems, director Robert Behler said the availability of the F-35 for missions when needed -- a key metric -- remains “around 50 percent, a condition that has existed with no significant improvement since October 2014, despite the increasing number of aircraft.”"

Rhino power 27th Jan 2018 13:50

The DOT&E's 2017 report in full...

Request Rejected

-RP

*Ignore the 'Request Rejected' title, it opens fine!

Lyneham Lad 27th Jan 2018 19:22

F-35 Problems: Late IOTE, F-35A Gun Inaccurate, F-35B Tires, Threat Data, Cyber…
 
Something of a summary of the reports linked above...

F-35 Problems: Late IOTE, F-35A Gun Inaccurate, F-35B Tires, Threat Data, Cyber…

George K Lee 27th Jan 2018 22:24

Thanks, LL.

The comments are illuminating. The pitch, volume and spittle content of the straight-out-of-the-gate vituperation from the fans and trollbots tells you there's some major concern about the issues in the report.

LockMart wasn't too happy with Dr Roper's confirmation testimony the other day either, one understands.

Old Ned 28th Jan 2018 16:15

Nuclear Sub Fleet
 
It will be the cost of replacing the 4 Nuc subs (£30 Billion but probably twice that by 2040) that will screw the defence budget. I dare say we will get the Lightning II, but not many and I also dare say the two new aircraft carriers will be late, so the aircraft will not be able to do their proper tasks.


What we surely need are simpler aircraft and lots of 'em!:confused:

pr00ne 28th Jan 2018 16:23

Old Ned,

You do know that both carriers are finished, one delivered and the other about to be?

Buster15 28th Jan 2018 16:55


Originally Posted by pr00ne (Post 10034243)
Old Ned,

You do know that both carriers are finished, one delivered and the other about to be?

FINISHED.Depends on what you mean by finished. The real issue is when it/they will be declared operational and that will not happen for a few years...

pr00ne 28th Jan 2018 16:58

Like any other new class of warship entering service. First F-35's to embark next year.

glad rag 28th Jan 2018 17:29


Originally Posted by pr00ne (Post 10034286)
Like any other new class of warship entering service. First F-35's to embark next year.

Much too easy to burst your bubble on that one....

pr00ne 28th Jan 2018 18:04

Er, How exactly?

Fonsini 28th Jan 2018 23:47

Has anyone improved their opinion of the F-35 since this thread began, I sense a slight change in the wind, just slight mind you.


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:59.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.