PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Ascent recruiting King Air aircrew (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/420364-ascent-recruiting-king-air-aircrew.html)

wetdreamdriver 11th Jul 2010 09:10

Silly me - I forgot the MOD doesn't procure anything state of the art! The KA is a 1969 design - nearly as old as the Jetstream!:ugh:

wdd

vecvechookattack 11th Jul 2010 09:45


Silly me - I forgot the MOD doesn't procure anything state of the art! The KA is a 1969 design - nearly as old as the Jetstream!
Now that did make me laugh... Very True and very funny...:ok:

Lima Juliet 11th Jul 2010 17:34

You see, where the BAES went wrong was not making a "iJetstream or Jetsream-i". It seems by just putting an "i" in the title these days and "hey presto" it's bang up to date!

Beechcraft King Air 350i Turboprop: Overview

sargs 12th Jul 2010 05:31


Okay what is a QOI?
I think it's actually QOi - it's a bang up to date QO

BEagle 12th Jul 2010 07:22

Qualified Looker Learner - i.e. one who instructs Observers.

Lima Juliet 12th Jul 2010 20:20

In the world of Business and Finance a QOI is a Questionable Outside Investor!!! :uhoh:

BEagle 12th Jul 2010 22:01

Harsh, Kreuger Flap, harsh.....

















...but fair.

Uncle Ginsters 13th Jul 2010 15:57


Many people have slagged off the UKMFTS for no other reason other than it exchanges military jobs for civilian jobs.
So isn't that a valid point in itself then? Where once there was a post for Servicemen, now there isn't.

In these times with little easing of Op Tempo in sight, what's wrong with a post that our folk can relax a little and see their families' for a tour? There is no doubt that this has already had an effect in the RAF with the numbers of posts available for QFIs being reduced (though not for the same reason).

What happens after the last generation of ex-Service instructors retire - will the through-and-through civvy instructor be able to offer the same product? We will, no doubt, find out in due course.:ugh:

BEagle 13th Jul 2010 16:19


What happens after the last generation of ex-Service instructors retire - will the through-and-through civvy instructor be able to offer the same product? We will, no doubt, find out in due course.:ugh:
By which time it'll be too late to do anything about it.....:mad:

There won't be any money to repair the damage; neither will there be sufficient people to train as QFIs by the remnants of CFS once this whole sad, sorry mess collapses in on itself.

Fatty 15th Jul 2010 08:29

Does Anybody know what Ascent plan to pay?

Are they expecting you to rely on your pension?

Ta.

Fatty.

BEagle 15th Jul 2010 10:33

Rule No. 1 is never seek employment from someone expecting you to 'top up' your Service pension with their salary!

For pilots, they will need to compete with the salary scale and Ts&Cs for a line captain with airlines such as flybe or Eastern Airlines at the very least.

If they cannot match them, WALK AWAY!!

cornish-stormrider 15th Jul 2010 11:06

Wise words Beags. Now if you can just get them to offer a half decent salary...

Trim Stab 16th Jul 2010 12:28


For pilots, they will need to compete with the salary scale and Ts&Cs for a line captain with airlines such as flybe or Eastern Airlines at the very least.
Why should they need to pay any more than (say) Cobham pay their King Air pilots?

Chicken Leg 16th Jul 2010 18:48


For pilots, they will need to compete with the salary scale and Ts&Cs for a line captain with airlines such as flybe or Eastern Airlines at the very least.
Rubbish! Why would they be required to do that? Because the pilot job market is so competitive in the UK right now? Because pilots are so difficult to find?

By your argument, Flyby and Eastern would have to compete with BA and Virgin at the very least?

BEagle 16th Jul 2010 19:02

Bolleaux!

flybe and Eastern effectively define the basic market rate for twin turboprop aviation. There's no reason why some mercenary MFTS organisation should attempt to undercut that rate - or to offer lower Ts and Cs - just because they think that ex-military pilots will fall over themselves in a headlong rush to top up their pensions with a low salary.

In any case, they will have factored pilot salaries into their business model. If the civilian market picks up in a couple of years and MFTS are not offering a competitive package, they will very soon end up with no pilots at all.

Oh dear, what a pity, never mind.....:hmm:

wetdreamdriver 16th Jul 2010 19:47

Trouble is BEagle is that not everyone wants to strap an airliner to their backsides and go from A to B and back again 3 times a day without touching the controls! At least in the contracted mil jobs, you get to fly the a/c on a variety of different profiles with a different baby looker to beast each time.

variety is the spice of life! - its not all about salary! And I bet at Ascent, you won't have any Sh1t secondary duties!

WDD

Trim Stab 16th Jul 2010 20:14


just because they think that ex-military pilots will fall over themselves in a headlong rush to top up their pensions with a low salary.
What makes you think that ex-mil pilots should measure their worth against the salary levels of experienced airline pilots? Ex-mil pilots generally have relatively little experience that is relevant to the airline business, often a bit of an inflated opinion regarding their capabilities (standing by to be flamed, which will prove my point..), and are competing against experienced civ pilots with considerably more relevant experience of civ ops, and an established track record of putting up with endemic job insecurity, unsociable constantly changing rostas, constant bull**** from the beancounters etc.

And as WDD pointed out, there are horses for courses, and some ex-mil pilots may simply prefer to fly with Ascent within their comfort zone than go into civ flying with its own panoply of stresses and general crap.

Uncle Ginsters 16th Jul 2010 20:43


an established track record of putting up with endemic job insecurity, unsociable constantly changing rostas, constant bull**** from the beancounters etc.
Sorry TS - was that the Military or Civil side you were talking about there?:confused:

Without biting to your obvious hook, i think there are many in the 2 Gp empire that would beg to differ with several of your comments above...

6Z3 16th Jul 2010 21:00

Half a bottle speaking; seems to me that Descent would have been a more appropriate handle?


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:15.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.