Armed forces 'facing massive cuts'
 

:ugh:Last man in please turn the lights out................ beggars belief, you are at war and you are looking at more cuts......:mad::mad:

Armed forces 'facing massive cuts' - MSN News - MSN UK

When is someone in a position of seniority going to show some b*lls, some real leadership and stand up and say "we cannot do this anymore"??

An MoD spokesman said: "Like all departments, the Ministry of Defence is facing challenging financial circumstances...

I may be a bit thick, but are the financial challenges made just a tad worse by constantly being sent to various wars?

I don't seem to remember 'all departments' having this challenge. Is it just me, or is it obvious that if we were not constantly overseas, then we would be saving some money, and numbers would not need to be cut?

Its quoted that the Treasury pays the war expenses but I'd like to see a breakdown. Do they just pay for bullets and beans and some extra fuel or the whole shebang?

Doesn't this government understand anything about priorities?

By all means reduce the size of the armed forces in times of peace and stability but when the reverse is true of the world today this is complete madness.:ugh:

It was this government's foreign policy that got us into these recent wars in the first place. I just wonder what contingency planning exists for any future conflict, the simple answer is that even a minor flare-up of the terrorism previously seen in NI that required troops to support the civil powers would push us over the edge.....

This government's record of mis-management of practically everything a central government ought to be responsible for seems to know no bounds....:mad:.

MB

How else can the government afford £52.5 chinooks??! :ugh:

This report is by the Royal United Services Institute, an independent think tank. That is to to say, it is not an official government announcement. Perhaps we should delay our head banging until more is known?

Besides, as a MoD spokesman freely admits :...

I'm quite sure that in this time scale "this government" will have become "that government" and then we'll see if there are any holy saviours of the armed forces in the blue corner.

Methinks I jumped ship at the right time..............

First job of the Govt - security of the nation.

Seems to have got lost somewhere.

So we will possibly be left with a strategic nuclear deterrent and some armed police..........

OP

Sorry OP. Whilst I agree with you in principle, in fact the first priority of any government throughout the world is security of thier own pay, pensions, expenses, perks and conditions of employment etc.

All else comes after that.

:ok::)

Doc C

I bet the Fire Brigade's Unions are looking at this with interest.

'Hmm....Not enough service men to cover us if we go on strike'

Cut's are understandable given the economic climate. The question is whether the new SDR will deliver a realistic reduction in UK PLC's global ambition as a "force for good." Stop spending on capabilities and force sizes that we can't afford. It'll be a very sad day, but it's been inevitable since Adolph thought "I wonder where I can invade today."

My Rant....
 

NOMOREFREETIME: Firemen..... Don't get me started on those Lazy Basta*ds !!

The cuts that are coming, we all know they are and will be badly managed once again. This Un-Elected Prime (incorrectly titled) Minister from skirt wearing land up North has and will do nothing to help us.... Ever.

We don't win votes; so lets not assume the others are going to be our saviours either, but they might just have a clue about England and not the colonies; for it is the outposts that get the loony Labour facade into town.

The NHS can litterally save Billions. Here is 2 options that would save Billions in the first year.
i) Get rid of half the bearucratic management that clogs everything they do.
ii) Stop wasting money on Operations for people who are clearly 'dodging coffins' as it is. How much, for instance does a hip replacement operation cost?? For that 85 Year Old to live another 6 Months / year. Is that a justifiable spend ?

Education.... There is another area that is now battered with bearucrats and assesors.... Let all departments get back to basics.

The Military is no Angel service in all this. Our Senior masters have for years feathered there own nests and created post after post for Air ranks etc.
i) Why are there more Air Ranks now than at any time during WW2, when the RAF strength was in excess of a Million ?
ii) Why are there more Engineering Officers than Aircraft ?
iii) Why are there over 400 Group Captains.... How many groups (sorry, Stations as the rank balance has slipped one position), Stations have we got left?

Cut these Desk bound, Buzz word creating simpletons and we would have some money to go out and do what we do.....

Right, I'm off down south..... If they have managed to provide a Plane to get me there. Movers in MPA..... INCOMING..... I haven't forgotten your lack of ability in anything other than the skill of PR regards your own self importance !!

Missing an 'n' there surely...

By either measure this bunch is failing Doc C

OP

.....sometimes it just takes 1 single post to brighten an otherwise very sh1tty day! :D:D

......made me spill my coffee 'though! :)

TVM to f_m, H-W

It is 45 years since I signed on the dotted line in January 1965 and became an Officer Cadet at South Cerney. RAF Manpower then was 132,000 - today it is 44,000 and falling by 5 persons every day on average.

Where are they going to get the personnel to man the "Green Godesss" vehicles the next time the firemen go on strike? (Experience shows that it is not a question of "IF" the firemen go on strike!!)

What 'green goddesses' are you talking about? The MoD sold them all a few years ago to save money on the maintenance!! :ugh:

Good luck with the journey formertonkaplum.

As for wasting money, MPA is one of the biggest wastes of resources in the defence budget - £1 million a day is the estimate!!

formertonkaplum:

Good rant - do you feel better for getting that off your chest? Unfortunately you seem to have falling into the 'stereotypical rant' trap. Do you have first hand knowledge of those in NHS management, RAF Air Ranks or Engineering Officers? Probably not, but hey, they're easy targets aren't they.

Speaking from a position of some authority, only one EngO per ac would be pushing efficiency measures totally over the edge. Sure there are always goign to be those in more worthwhile jobs than others, but in case you weren't aware, engineering officers do more than just look after the ac and lead those that maintain them. Perhaps you didn't ever take the time to travel further than the Sqn or Mess bar whilst you were still flying...

I know I shouldn't have bitten but ignorance in this forum just winds me up!