PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Peterborough Down the Memory Hole? (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/317214-peterborough-down-memory-hole.html)

highcirrus 9th Mar 2008 11:33

Peterborough Down the Memory Hole?
 
Is it my imagination or did I start reading a thread yesterday that dealt with RAF personnel being advised by the Station Commander of RAF Wittering not to wear uniform whilst in the environs of Peterborough for fear of provoking the locals to abusive behaviour?

If I'm not imagining things and an Orwellian punt into Winston Smith’s memory hole has not taken place, can someone tell me where the thread has been moved to?

Wrathmonk 9th Mar 2008 11:42

Suspect its been pulled because it was starting to get very personal in its attacks on certain (named) individuals by some of PPRuNes armchair air marshal members!:cool:

Bit like the thread on the Victor crash in Canada.

BobHead 9th Mar 2008 11:43

If this is the dress code for RAF personnel in public in London then perhaps they should not be seen in public in uniform.

What ever happen to standards when a Corporal is in Desert Cam Gear and an Officer in flying overalls.

http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p...3_468x8261.jpg

Even when I was a submariner I was never seen in public in working gear.

Bob

Avitor 9th Mar 2008 11:47

It would take a brave scroat to bully that Corporal...... :}

Wrathmonk 9th Mar 2008 11:48

Bob

Both authorised uniform - have a look at the majority of "welcome home" parades for the troops. All in dessies.

And as a sun-dodger yourself can I thank you for not wearing your uniform in public post tour - it was probably able to stand up, and even walk, on its own!!!:p:E

Chugalug2 9th Mar 2008 11:54


If this is the dress code for RAF personnel in public in London then perhaps they should not be seen in public in uniform.
I think we'll find it is dress code as defined by MOD PR, as against the RAF. In our day Bob (is that pronounced 'per Black Adder' ? :)), we dressed as ordered. I think that you'll find that this pair did the same.

As to:

What ever happen to standards
I only wish that I had ever attained anything like the standards that this pair set. Respect!

Cyclone733 9th Mar 2008 11:56

Bobhead,


What ever happen to standards when a Corporal is in Desert Cam Gear and an Officer in flying overalls
I get the impression this was for publicity reasons, none the less, I'm more than happy to see these and any other members of the armed forces out and about in uniform, even if it may not match the dress standards of the dark ages of the cold war.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770


"I'm proud of this uniform because it identifies me as a serviceman, as a protector of the Sovereign.

"I'm proud of it because the RAF Regiment has made me what I am today - a Military Cross winner. And no-one can take that away."
- Cpl Hayden MC

Cyclone

BOAC 9th Mar 2008 12:16

Forgive the interruption, but if I recall correctly, 'AIDU' began the thread and it is possible has deleted it. You could try a PM to AIDU to ask. Since it is 'out of sight' to me as well I suspect that is the case?

Incidentally, I heard a rather disappointing 'ineffective' reply by Torpy on the matter on Radio4 lunchtime news on Friday.

Bobhead - is that chin real....?

highcirrus 9th Mar 2008 12:28

I’d say that the more we see the likes of Flight Lieutenant Michelle Goodman DFC and Corporal David Hayden MC on the benighted streets of UK, wearing either dress or working uniform, the better. I have a growing sense that an increasingly visible uniformed Service presence may serve as a much needed reassurance to the civil population that the nation still possesses an honourable, selfless and professional force that can ultimately be called upon to deal with serious exigencies both at home as well as overseas. Moreover, perhaps such a growing presence is urgently required in light of what seems to be a decreasing presence of the Police Force on our streets and may even be catalytic in encouraging a reversal of this catastrophic phenomenon.

GunkyTom 9th Mar 2008 12:36

Bob or is it Richard ? I am sure they are wearing an authorised uniform as the Military is becoming more acutely aware of Twits criticising every move of our lads and lasses. I expect if you had/have been awarded some sort of honour, you would have been guided on appropriate dress for the occasion .

BEagle 9th Mar 2008 12:37

Regarding 'vanishing threads', I'll think you'll find that patience with some posters has now reached PLE....

That is a first rate photo of Flt Lt Goodman DFC and Cpl Hayden MC.

Good to see smart, practical uniforms being worn publicly. Just as it was good to see a smartly dressed TriStar pilot shopping in Waitrose last Friday in No.14 dress.

Congratulations to all those who received operational awards.

9.81m/s/s 9th Mar 2008 13:11

Bob,

They were probably in those particular uniforms for effect and to remind everyone of where we are and what we are doing so do me a favour and keep your pathetic views off pprune and get a life you k*ob!! These guys are out there doing it !!!!

Hummingfrog 9th Mar 2008 13:23

I am sure that this was very much a PR exercise - even down to the PC chat given by the young lady to the news media - need more girls in RAF etc.

I applaud the bravery of these young men and woman and they deserve every plaudit they get.

One point, though, as far as I remember when I was a lad flying overalls were not classed as uniform but working dress;)

HF

Dan D'air 9th Mar 2008 13:23


"The varying standard of RAF threads"
I don't believe that they vary very much at all. They both look very smart but lets face it, they could be walking down the street looking like an absolute bag of $h1te and I for one wouldn't bat an eyelid. They have (along with the 182 recently decorated) and everyone else who has and are still serving more than proved themselves and as the majority of posters on this thread have so rightly stated, we are and should be hugely proud of them.

airborne_artist 9th Mar 2008 13:36

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/grap...03/09/matt.gif

TEEEJ 9th Mar 2008 13:52

Bob,

Please put brain in gear before posting! Did you do any background on the image that you posted? Did it ever cross your mind that the personnel involved were briefed on the uniform to wear?

Riskman 9th Mar 2008 14:33

I hope the recruiters can use that photograph of Flt Lt Goodman DFC and Cpl Hayden MC. The dress, poise and self-confidence they portray would make any youngster think 'I want to be like them'.

Rise above the rest/Be the best/Be part of something all sounded a bit tame and wishful, and then along come two individuals who have done just that.

Makes me proud. Again.


ps Do aircrew get sewn in to their growbags?;)

Al R 9th Mar 2008 15:39

The one thought that strikes me is that I'm 'only' in my mid 40s and that this pair would have been toddlers or operating at low altitude when I joined up. These aren't the old duffers that we're used to seeing wheeled out for the cameras - these are.. 'young people', experienced and at the top end of their game. And slightly off at a tangent, its the first time that I actually get the feeling that the baton (whatever thats worth) has been passed. The likes of Chugalug of course, will have experienced this many times. I also feel that the baton is in very good hands.

And looking at Michelle and thinking of being in good ha..

Sorry. :E

C130 Techie 9th Mar 2008 15:49

BobHead

I would suggest that those pictured and the others who have been decorated with them have raised the standards to a level that you (and I) can only hope to attain. The mode of dress that they are in is both smart and in keeping with the operational theatres in which they were serving when decorated. It puts things very much into perspective.

Runaway Gun 9th Mar 2008 15:51

FFS
 
If the uniform is good enough to wear whilst being shot at and doing your job (and bloody well as these two have been recognised), then it's definitely good enough to wear back in your own country. Stop your whinging !!

RETDPI 9th Mar 2008 16:02

100% agreed Al R. One gets the feeling of "at last!"
Having been saddened by some of the utterances (and silences) of my still serving contemporaries and having felt totally for the flying ladies after the crass "Samsonite" faux pas, I think that here we have a well deserved and well handled bit of positive publicity for the Service.
It's good for the girls, good for the SH world, good for the Rocks and good for the RAF at large.
It's also good for the morale of boring retired old duffers (like Beags).

Chris Kebab 9th Mar 2008 16:49

BobHead, or can I call you Dick?

You're not related to Brian Moore are you?

BEagle 9th Mar 2008 17:14

Oi, Redders, you old spy, I resemble that remark!

Seriously though, those two must be a PR person's dream. If not, then they darn well should be! A tough Rock in immaculate desert combat kit and a young lady combat pilot in a smart flying suit - both of whom have been highly decorated for their bravery under fire.

You can't get better than that!

Dan D'air 9th Mar 2008 17:27

Beags,

Once again the sagacity of experience shines through in one of your posts. Absolutely, totally impressive. Not even a Kwik-fit fitter could better what we have seen this week.:ok::ok::ok::ok::ok:

BobHead 9th Mar 2008 17:29

You are such a touchy lot, I seem to have a whole keep net full, personal insults as well.

I made no reference to the people inside the uniforms and I have read of their deeds which has nothing to do with the uniforms they are wearing in public let alone in Perterborough. The next erk who wanders down the main road in that fair city dressed in greasy RAF overalls, fag in gob, pencil stub behind the left ear (thats if he is left handed of course) and no beret will be OK when the Snow Drops pass by cos yoos lot say so.

BH:ugh:

RTR 9th Mar 2008 17:30

Who the hell took that picture?

I cannot imagine a better image to present to ANYONE, let alone the general public OR those thinking of joining up, to show what being a member of our armed forces is about. It beats hands down anything seen before.

MOD, get yer fingers out! You have been presented with something that will not pass this way again.

buoy15 9th Mar 2008 17:39

Both in step as well - a picture paints a thousand words:ok:

GunkyTom 9th Mar 2008 17:57

'The next erk who wanders down the main road in that fair city dressed in greasy RAF overalls, fag in gob, pencil stub behind the left ear (thats if he is left handed of course) and no beret will be OK when the Snow Drops pass by cos yoos lot say so.'

It's too late to backpedal and try to turn your crass, unwelcome comments into a pseudo fishing trip. YOU HAVE LOST FACE.When have you ever seen the above description walking down any High Street? What do you have against the RAF or military for that matter? I wouldn't have expected the comments from an ex mil .The forces have enough of a hard time at the moment without the above type of comments from someone who should know betterhttp://www.pprune.org/forums/images/icons//icon8.gif

airsound 9th Mar 2008 20:09

The Wittering/Peterborough situation may have been a bit of an over-reaction, and there may be more to it than meets the eye. But it does seem to have focussed the attention of the media on some of the problems that PPRuNers know only too well, problems that include the often unfair and uncaring attitude of some of the public to the armed forces.

Here’s a favourable example, from The Independent on Sunday - an organ not invariably known for its pro-forces views. The article, by Sarah Sands, is called The brave wear a uniform, the coward wears a suit, and it’s worth reading in full - but in the meantime, this is the last paragraph.

If we abuse those who would lay down their lives for us, we are not a society at all. I prefer to think that we have been thoughtless rather than cruel. We must visibly honour our armed forces and – anathema to Gordon Brown and David Cameron – we must pay for them and their families. Their blood, our treasure, according to the Covenant.

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion...it-793361.html


airsound

Chugalug2 9th Mar 2008 22:44

airsound, an excellent article by Sarah Sands, so much so that I have saved it. Thanks for the heads up, I would commend it to all! It's all about honour she says, not within the Services for she credits them with that in abundance but within the rest of us. Here she finds a deficiency, and hopes that its lack is thoughtlessness. I disagree, you don't just forget to act and think honourably, you are simply dishonourable. That is the charge levelled at us. Time to change our ways and show respect to those who have earned it, rather than those who demand it while asking "Do you know who I am?"

allan909 10th Mar 2008 07:32

....and just look at those creases in the trousers of the DPM! Bloody impressive. I've seen professional desk bound aircrew that wouldn't know what an iron was let alone how to use one on a uniform.

Morgan45 15th Mar 2008 15:55

:ok:
http://www.lynnnews.co.uk/news/RAF-M...orm.3864849.jp

Ok, Marham Village is not Peterborough but this is what I'd expect from RAF :D
Hope lots more stations will follow!!

FJJP 16th Mar 2008 08:41

Those who abuse servicemen would be well advise to heed the events some years ago, where apprentices from Locking went throught a local gang in Weston-Super-Mare. Several apprentices were duffed up by the local feral yoofs; the entire apprentice wing demolished the feral cafe and put the miscreants in casualty [including the cafe proprietor, sympatheric to the thugs].

Also, a number of guys on detachment went to the aid of a young girl being given a hard time be feral thrugs in a pub in Forres - she, and the local plods were ever so grateful to have said ferals sorted out....

Impiger 16th Mar 2008 08:43

BobHead is way off the mark with his comments but at least its given us a chance to wade in with positivie views of the individuals, wearing smart uniforms of various types in public and the Service in general. A welcome change to much of the drivelling that happens on PPrune. So well done Bob you've probably had the exactly opposite effect to the one you intended but the outcome is very positive. Now I must dig out my old No14 Dress just to pop down to Waitrose - maybe I'll get a discount on the Claret:ok:

Mr C Hinecap 16th Mar 2008 10:37

Morgan - you'll find that anyone will wear their uniform in small towns near their bases. Sheesh - out at Marham it shows you've the potential to increase the local gene pool - and since we closd Colt, there is less chance of that happening out there!

Al R 16th Mar 2008 13:17

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion...rm-793667.html

The Indy had an interesting perspective on this. And it finishes off by quickly comparing the blanket stacker management mentality with the pilot command mentality.

Mr C Hinecap 16th Mar 2008 17:59

AI R - you have interpreted a fairly poor article pretty badly - but then again, it would not have fitted your tedious needs otherwise. I'm not minded to point out the journalistic licenses within the article, but anyone who knows the area, the base in question and the people will know exactly what I mean. Your stacker / pilot comparison is your own and I'd take you to task on it - if you could reason or listen to reason. Please stick to writing to the Mail.

Romeo Oscar Golf 16th Mar 2008 18:03


So well done Bob you've probably had the exactly opposite effect to the one you intended but the outcome is very positive.
Sorry, chaps, but if you took time to breath before taking the bait you would quickly realise that an (ancient) ex submariner talking about uniform standards and the wearing of them in public just had to be a wind up.
Poor picture selection however (for a wind up).:=

Al R 16th Mar 2008 20:18

What makes it 'poor', Hinecap :confused: ? For the Indy to come out in support of anything related to wearing a uniform must have taken a leap of faith greater than Atherton could ever have in the abilities of those under her command, and the local situation.

The scribbly is an ex squaddie, so he has a bit of an insight. What other parts of his piece did you dissagree with? Lets see.
  • "Gordon Brown's hasty statement does not mean the Government show much meaningful respect for the armed services."
Correct, Brown is notorious for his scathing contempt for the MoD.
  • "Coroners' inquests have repeatedly shown that troops have died because of avoidable deficiencies in their equipment."
Again, correct.
  • "Returning causalities have sometimes lacked the medical treatment they deserve. Veterans who suffer trauma have been badly served."
Correct.
  • "And when the dead arrive home in coffins, do ministers show their gratitude by turning up at the airfield. Did Mr Blair ever do that? Does Mr Brown? Does anybody?"
Well, do they?

Just which part do you dissagree with?

On Friday, I journeyed up from London to P'boro with an ex neighbour, who has worked for Huntingdon Life Sciences since 1997, when I first met him. He reminded me about the time that his son and daughter were shouted at by hemp underpant wearing, tofu munching nutters, but not once did any of that force him to move away or restrict his way of living. I also chatted to a lady from Zimbabwe taxi driver in P'boro who told me that military fares usually got discount as long as the cab didn't get puked up in.

Finally, its not about MY needs Hinecap. You can be as offensive as you like about that, but this is not about one person's needs. Atherton's responsibility goes beyond handing a hankie to any single serviceman ar woman and I'm relieved that other stations are lining up quite publically, to announce contra policies. The sooner Group Captain Atherton gets promoted out of harm's way, the sooner the RAF can get the benefit of her unique style of macromanagement and the sooner the troops on the shop floor can back back to normality.

Finally, with regards to my blanket stacker reference.. where's your sense of humour? Feel free to continue referencing me as thick, time expired and living in the past. ;)

noregrets 16th Mar 2008 21:27

Al R, like Mr C I'm afraid that I must take you up on your rather lame stacker-pilot comparison. You seem to neglect that the RAF is run by pilots (and always has been), and that the creeping ingress of management twaddle into the Service over the past 20 years has been instigated, supported and driven by... hmm, let's see now! For what it's worth, my abiding memory of many years's service on flying stations was the seemingly endless deluge of corporate b******s from the Stn Cdr, OC Fg Sqns and SHQ - at times it seemed that the only true examples of leadership and command could be found in Eng & Supply Wg. Perhaps you might like to re-consider your rather poor attempt at banter!


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:05.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.