PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Lock-and-loadmaster (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/263001-lock-loadmaster.html)

dogdriver 5th Feb 2007 17:01

Lock-and-loadmaster
 
The Westminster Hall debate on 30th Jan included a reference to an RAF Herc loadie finding himself patrolling the streets of Iraq.

"...someone joined the RAF in a specialist role—they had been trained in packing equipment to be loaded on to Hercules aircraft for logistical purposes—and found themselves suddenly taken on a short, sharp training course to go into a peacekeeping role in Iraq on the front line...The concern raised ... was not that it was a deployable skill—they recognised that it would be deployed—but that the person was being deployed to do a peacekeeping role on the streets, on the front line, and that they were not being deployed to use their skill. The concern was that the person was being used not in an RAF regimental role but in a military role with the Army."

I'm assuming either the MP has seriously got the wrong end of the stick - no aircrew in their right mind would end up boots on ground, and no infantry unit in their right mind would welcome them - but wanted to double-check if anyone had heard of this story (raised with the MP of West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) or anything similar?

greycoat 5th Feb 2007 21:23

Where does it state that the person was a loadie? The description could apply equally as well to a mover. Cue yet another thread bashing movers.

ATCO17 5th Feb 2007 21:41

"Warfighter first, Specialist second"!!:O

wg13_dummy 5th Feb 2007 21:50

Who the **** would want a shiny arsed mover on patrol with them???


I'd rather have Steven Hawkins coving my 6 with a pintle mounted GPMG on his chair.

BEagle 5th Feb 2007 22:00

He could always make the nasty Sonny & Cher lot a nice cup of tea......

Which, in fact, would probably be a whole lot more useful than letting some steroid-chewing idiot with Rambo pretensions loose on the streets with a belt fed .50 calibre machine gun M-60 to 'assist with reconstruction'....:hmm: ?

wg13_dummy 5th Feb 2007 22:05

Hows the moon from your planet Beags?? :uhoh:

1000CC'soffun 5th Feb 2007 22:13

Bored!
 
:rolleyes:
I must have been bored, I just spent half an hour looking on the Parliament website for more information, what a waste of time.

Best I trot off and zero my Rifle then.

16 blades 5th Feb 2007 23:24


if the guy was a loady, what makes him different from your experienced Q holding Harrier, F3, GR4,Typhoon, Sentry or Jag NCO / SNCO
ALOT. HE is Aircrew. They are not (Sentry excepted perhaps). Ground one member of a crew and you have lost that whole crew from the tasking plot.

Haven't spent much time out of the Fast Jet world, have you?

16B

dionysius 6th Feb 2007 08:31

Sounds like he may be a Supplier :eek:

Filthy 6th Feb 2007 09:17

Gents,

whilst in Afg crewing albert all crew members were trained in patrolling and CP skills prior to deploying. This was a self preservation skill.

I have to agree warfighter first-specialist second...it may be useful when you least expect it....

charliegolf 6th Feb 2007 14:12

Garth (can't remember his name), a crewman on 72 Sqn used to go on patrols from Bessie in the 80s. For fun!
CG

Rheinstorff 6th Feb 2007 14:33

Sounds like the usual ill-informed parliamentary debate on defence issues, where the MP can't be bothered to find out the facts, or thinks he knows what he's talking about without checking. He probably just means going outside of a defended location on the ground.

Patrolling 'the streets' (or any other part of Iraq or Afghanistan) is fundamentally soldier (generic) business, ie, for those who are trained for the purpose. Anyone else attempting it is asking for trouble and would probably be a liability in a contact.

QFIhawkman 6th Feb 2007 14:38

I quote filthy: "whilst in Afg crewing albert all crew members were trained in patrolling and CP skills prior to deploying. This was a self preservation skill."


Have I got this right? You believe that all the Herc crews did the 2 week IRT course at Honington? Or do you mean the 1 day comedy IRT course at Lyneham?

I've done both and the 1 day course doesn't equip you one jot to patrol on the streets. The 2 week course is similarly no good at turning Officer Aircrew into junior Rambos, but it at least gives you an idea of how to stay alive so that you're not quite so much a hinderance to your escort when going into town. I'd still say that niether of these courses can promote your CCS "skills" to budding Infantryman, not by a long shot.

Oh and I DO hope that by CP skills you don't mean Close Protection?
If not please feel free to correct me as I'm not aware of any other acronym using those letters. (Genuinely).


Either way, the man in the parliamentary question would appear to be a supplier or a mover on convoy duties. A common occurence.

Rheinstorff 6th Feb 2007 15:55

C130 crews do get bespoke additional trg, from their tame Rocks, to prepare them if they land somewhere less friendly than planned. It would be quite inappropriate to go into the detail of what's involved for the obvious OPSEC reasons.

Faithless 6th Feb 2007 19:39

WG 13

"Who the **** would want a shiny arsed mover on patrol with them???"


"I'd rather have Steven Hawkins coving my 6 with a pintle mounted GPMG on his chair."

Priceless:D It was that funny that I p1ssed myself:ok:

Master Gunner 6th Feb 2007 20:20

Thats Me !!
 
Yes I was that man nicknamed Garth, but I never did anything as mad as going on patrol on the ground in Bandit Country. However, I do recall that there were a couple of aircrew on 72 who managed to get out with the army (a tall, cricket playing scotsman by the the name of Scott was one). We thought flying in NI was dangerous then, but given the current world hotspots it paints a very different picture. Take care all you frontliners. DC

Faithless 6th Feb 2007 20:23

"I think what made you wee is called incontinence"

I know....Just ask your mom:E

The Helpful Stacker 6th Feb 2007 20:49

As I mentioned on the 'arrse' thread about this very subject I reckon there has been a slight mix-up.

As many of us on here are no doubt aware the RAF operates mainly three types of pre-deployment course for folk heading somewhere hot and sandy.

The 'vicars and tarts' course, for those off to Al Udeid etc - A day in your local rock shop being told to drink lots of water when its hot (like, doh) and leave scorpions alone.

The 'you might have to stag on at Basrah' course - A week at either your local rock shop if on a large unit or somewhere like High Wycombe if from a small unit, learning how to get out of a vehicle quickly should an Iranian backed nut job manage to set up an ambush outside J1 village and spring it whilst you are heading around to buy a Subway in one of the knackered Land Rovers.

The 'you either have to fly the things we are here to support or your trade is so low down the pecking order that we have decided you are going to play target to draw attention away from the nice big fuel tanker convoy' course - For those folk who may find themselves outside the wire quite a bit, whether in the air or in the back of a stripped down Land Rover on their way to Al Amarah etc.


To me it sounds like either they are aircrew who have been given the latter course in case they should find themselves in the middle of the desert standing next to the smoking remains of a recently serviceable a/c or a mover who for some strange reason has got lost and isn't damaging a/c on the pan or losing luggage but is actually outside the wire playing target to the friendly locals.

BTW, to whoever suggested it sounds like a stacker, that can't be right because I'm sure I'm about the only one in the trade who deploys away (as they seem to come around so often)......:rolleyes:

Rheinstorff 7th Feb 2007 08:46

See my post from yesterday; C130 crews receive bespoke training from the RAF Regt. This is different from the other types of Individual Reinforcement/Pre-Deployment Training.

I_stood_in_the_door 7th Feb 2007 12:31

Fire and Manouevre
 
No doubt Stevie hawkins would have the ability to win the firefight in his armoured wheelchair better than most of our blue bretheren!!

Does he have a special brake on his chariot to prevent himself being propelled backwards or does he have an action man stylee 'Sustained Fire Kick Ass Rambo Drawer of First Blood' Wheelchair?

If you can't beat 'em, join 'em!!

LGOGOOTFW

ISITD

:oh:

irishlogster 7th Feb 2007 19:27

tut tut he;pful... me does sum too... 2nd one in 20 months :ouch:

oldbilbo 7th Feb 2007 22:52

Time-serving in Thumrait
 
At times in the late 70s/early 80s, there was an OPREQ to fly team members of the Sultan's Special Force from Thumrait ( near their base) to the capital, using two-seat Jaguars, PDQ, while the rest of the team went by whatever was available - a BAC-111 or Herc. So they had to be potty-trained. Good sport!

They tried to reciprocate, and one of the distractions they came up with was to put volunteers through their CQB course. Visualise, if you will, a line of assorted, superannuated and hungover single-seat jocks in a line, shuffling along through a 'toytown' range, carrying live-loaded 9mm handguns and told to respond to the various pop-up targets - left, right, centre and behind......:uhoh::uhoh:

The other distraction was an invitation to go on patrol with them, on the several occasions they were directed to perform in 'ordinary infantry' mode, and do Aggressive Patrolling of a chunk of the Jebel. The local opposition, the 'adu', usually tried something on, little realising what a hornet's nest they were stirring up. Each time a contact report was made, where one of the aircrew 'tourists' was involved, that was patched through to Thumrait Ops and every Jag and Hunter that could find an excuse went haring over there to see what was going on. Tasking? Huh? ;);)

CommonSenseApproach 11th Feb 2007 00:19

The Real Lock-and-loadmaster
 
And there was I logging-on this morning after a long and dusty trip expecting that this thread would describe the circumstances that lead to a recent “up-ending” of one of our Alberts some where “in theatre”. “Lock-and-loadmaster”; Pallet locks and Load Master perhaps? A desire to tweak the trim somewhat by moving the forward pallet further forward (or was it to make room for the rations?), yet forgetting that on the J the release mechanism for pallets works from rear to front (the front pallet being the last to be disengaged in a sequence designed for jettison). The action therefore of releasing the pallets allowed the load to roll backwards and whilst the rear pallet stopped when it hit the door (the ramp was co-planer e.g. at the horizontal, but the door was down). The shift of gravity caused a effect on the front enders horizon similar to that of the slide down which Virgil Tracy sped en route to Thunderbird 2. Per Ardua ad Astra? Well at least the front enders were facing the right way!:rolleyes:
The thing that I find most perturbing is:
a. The ac was already in trim before this strange behaviour took place.
b. There were no movers in sight to blame (and even if they had been it had been loaded in trim):ugh:

Any J types care to comment?:rolleyes:

Useless Arthur 11th Feb 2007 13:30

Out on Patrol
 
I've always found there's plenty of chance to get out and about when you're on a Det. No point in just going through the routine for 4 months. It must be the Walt in me, but on my TELIC stint a year or so ago, I managed to get a place on a Logs convoy to the SAAH and a 2-day trip from Shaibah to Abu Naji (and back!).

Got a good appreciation of what the army lads go through and the complexities of moving food, water and spares on the roads out there.

RTAs, top cover, break downs and a "come on" IED made the trips well worthwhile.

Blakey875 11th Feb 2007 15:41

Commonsense - Who was the Loadie? ABIW??

Now a 'J' Bloke!! 11th Feb 2007 19:14

Dear Common Sense Bloke;

You got any hard evidence...
or are you a mover???:ouch:

NAJB:cool:

Blakey875 13th Feb 2007 15:28

NAJ - Sorry for delay whilst waiting for confirmation. Yes - it did happen in province next to Helmand. Am advised it was a Loadie incident and no Movers present the Loadie claimed locks were u/s. Since disproved.

dionysius 13th Feb 2007 16:11

Ah, Samuraimatt back "fishing" again............:=

eyespied 16th Feb 2007 08:58

C130 - I am amazed you got away without being challenged. if you knew the event happened why didn't you confirm to 'Now a J?'

1. How can you blame the Movers when you weren't there?
2. They weren't there and the Acft door was down...
3. First rule of Flight safety - Don't Assume .... Check!
4. Still a stupid trick to unlock the whole load at once?

Seldomfitforpurpose 21st Feb 2007 21:44

The latest rumour is a problem with the -4 which my source assures me the engineers are attributing to years of mis handling by the movers :ok:

Seems utterly plausible to me

gar170 24th Feb 2007 09:40

Well no surprise there then:rolleyes: .

So if there was a problem with the -4 then how did the movers manage to lock in the load?.

I think its more the case that the loadie started to believe your own press written on here and you are all perfect.
**** happens or is the case of what goes around comes around.

Mobile Muppet 24th Feb 2007 10:27

Seem to remember being in Kuwait City 03 when the same thing happened.
Loadie pulled all the locks to assist a QTR but the a/c was on an angled pan. The 2 movers coming to the a/c at the time made sure the mess ( 3 Pallets worth at various angles on the ground ) was cleaned up quickly and helped the loadie out without a word. But as usual got no thanks and no ground incident report raised either... makes you wonder why we bother to help eh !

**** happens.. and will continue to happen to us all...

MM

Seldomfitforpurpose 24th Feb 2007 10:44

MM

Have a word with yourself, if the two movers had carried out their duties a little more dilligently and chocked the load that incident you refer to would never have occured, and all these subsequent ground incidents would stop if you lot got your act together, bloo@y movers :p

gar170 24th Feb 2007 11:51

Seldomfitforlife

Maybe you should ask PMA to transfere you to oc movs i am sure that the trade has been crying out for a massiah like person as yourself.
I am sure if you managed to create the world in 6 days you should be able to fix the RAF's main problem area.

Seldomfitforpurpose 24th Feb 2007 12:15

Gar,

Are you actually implying that the movements trade are "the RAF's main problem area"? :E

Mobile Muppet 24th Feb 2007 12:37

SFFP
Your rantings do make me chuckle. Reading back through your previous posts on other topics it's clear to me and from other posters that you are infact a top to$$er. If your way of venting your anger or hatred is via this forum so be it but it's very sad to be honest for an adult. (It certinaly is'nt banter).

Go and have an "anti-movs" group hug with AWIB. :)

MM

gar170 24th Feb 2007 12:51

Seldomfitforlife

According to you maybe := .

But i would actually say it is really narrow minded self opinionated arses such as you.
And i mean that in a nice way:ok: .

Seldomfitforpurpose 24th Feb 2007 12:52

MM,

Don't pour scorn on me luvvie as it's Gar who is suggesting that the movements trade are "the RAF's main problem area" and not me as I think you are all great :ok:

Blakey875 24th Feb 2007 15:40

Seldom - Your'e ignorance of matters AT is now obvious. Quote " If the Movers had chocked the load...". They weren't at the aircraft by the time the Loadie had unlocked the load for Heaven's sake. I would love to hear a comment from Mr Perfect a.k.a. ABIW.....
Roll on 2012

Blakey875 24th Feb 2007 18:20

Sam - Yes and for years before that on the USAF, RCAF, Brazilian, Belgian and even Iranian C130 models....


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:22.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.