PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Name the JSF (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/226765-name-jsf.html)

Flt Lt Spry 23rd May 2006 20:40

How about the U.N.T. in RAF service?

And for the Navy, the Sea U.N.T....?

ZH875 23rd May 2006 20:44

For the RAF 'Dumbo' and for the Navy 'Nellie'





both are White Elephant's

Skunkerama 24th May 2006 11:16

Well we have the Typhoon so how about Tempest?

I would have suggested hurricane but the next aircraft that takes on that name had better be bloody special.

Clockwork Mouse 24th May 2006 11:20

As it does nothing except move mud, how about "Shovel?"

Duncano 24th May 2006 12:52

Name the JSF
 

Originally Posted by brickhistory
How about 'Camel?' It was a famous a/c, the namesake does live in the environment where the JSF is most likely to employ for the forseeable future...

What on the ground in the RAF Museum at Hendon.:rolleyes:

rich_hodgetts 24th May 2006 13:12

Keith?

Shane?

Almost_done 24th May 2006 13:40

Or as according to Flight,

Unsigned ?

Shadwell the old 24th May 2006 14:02

It must be the Prescott (as suggested earlier)

Why?

1. It costs far more than it is worth.
2. Nobody wants it in their backyard (hence the reason it is going to Lossie).
3. It does the work of 2 Jags.
4. It's ugly.
5. It's overweight.
6. It's very noisy to little efect.

Simple

Shadwell

GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU 24th May 2006 14:06

Why bother with a name? The Air Force never saw their way clear to giving the VC10 a name and it's probably a bit late now. Anyway, if we did call it the Dave, the Media and the MoD PR rags would forever call it the JSF F-35 Dave!

Off thread but this has put me on one of my pet hobbyhorses now. With American aircraft, why do they persist on using the US Service Type designator AND the name? (eg C-130 Hercules, F-18 Hornet etc). A C-130 is a Hercules! why drag it out?

Confucius 24th May 2006 14:47

Why not name it 'Superego'?

GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU 24th May 2006 14:56

Just a thought: why not the F-35 Avtur? That's no good though because it will confuse the Air Force when they fly them from carriers.

I know, lets enter into the modern spirit of operational safety and make the name a simple fuelling reminder. The Land A/C could be the Avtur and the Naval one the Avcat. No! that's no good either ; Avcat would have to wait until they build the F-44.

Disregard all previous.

:rolleyes:

KPax 24th May 2006 15:45

How about 'MENSTRUAL' as I suspect this will bleed the RAF for years.

Swifty_N 24th May 2006 17:48

Shane lol...R.I.P

The Helpful Stacker 24th May 2006 18:59


Originally Posted by GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU
Just a thought: why not the F-35 Avtur? That's no good though because it will confuse the Air Force when they fly them from carriers.

I know, lets enter into the modern spirit of operational safety and make the name a simple fuelling reminder. The Land A/C could be the Avtur and the Naval one the Avcat. No! that's no good either ; Avcat would have to wait until they build the F-44.

Disregard all previous.

:rolleyes:

The RAF doesn't use F35 Avtur, it uses F34 Avtur FSII. F35, nasty stuff, no lubricity agent, microbiological growth inhibitor or most importantly fuel system icing inhibitor.

THS - DFG West Moors veteran and all round fuels-bore.:(

GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU 24th May 2006 19:32


Originally Posted by The Helpful Stacker
The RAF doesn't use F35 Avtur, it uses F34 Avtur FSII. F35, nasty stuff, no lubricity agent, microbiological growth inhibitor or most importantly fuel system icing inhibitor.

THS - DFG West Moors veteran and all round fuels-bore.:(

THS; you are exactly right, of course. It was a compromise of accuracy for humour. Hmmm; 'suppose it would have been nice to hack one of them, though.

GBZ

Green Flash 24th May 2006 20:11

The Y-35. That's what everyone is saying!


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:14.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.