PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   FJ v Helicopter (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/212508-fj-v-helicopter.html)

L J R 24th Feb 2006 22:16

Get an Air to Air missile with a bigger yield!. What was that thing that the Voodoo used in the '60s, anyone, anyone?? - was it a Genie??

threepointonefour 24th Feb 2006 23:30


Originally Posted by Evalu8ter
But you have problems;

Too many to list here, but that's OT !!

Originally Posted by Evalu8ter
2. I'm RWR aware.

Woo hoo. So are all my adversaries.

Originally Posted by Evalu8ter
3. I know and exploit the weaknesses of your radar

I bet you don't.
And whilst you may think you can hide in a valley, you are totally predictable ... it's not rocket science to interpret raw radar cut off and translate the picture onto a map - navs have been trained in this for years ...

Originally Posted by Evalu8ter
4. I'll out-turn you all day, and I'll probably out endure you.

Day VMC: do all the turning you want, I'll sit at 10-12k and watch... and wait for my shot. And I bet none of your crew can see me up at height.
Night: Much much harder for the FJ to VID, but we have goggs too ...

Originally Posted by Evalu8ter
5. I will shoot back.

Up to 1-2nm (10-12k), vertically upwards with 90 deg aob??

Originally Posted by Evalu8ter
I've "fought" against F3s (very operator dependant)

ALL FJ and Rotary and ME are operator dependent. A non-point.

Originally Posted by Evalu8ter
Of all of the above ac, only the latter (Typhoon) has made me feel uncomfortable inside the merge-slag it off all you like, it can really turn / accellerate. So, does a jet mate want to bleed his energy, waste a weapon on a low PK shot and linger for our cavalry to arrive, I think not.

Nope. And I agree that any ht from 20' up to 30k+ puts a FJ in harm's way ... not a comfortable place to be at all.

Originally Posted by Evalu8ter
Mind you, all bets off with ASRAAM.....

Which we have had for 3 yrs ...so I guess that all bets have been off for a while?

threepointonefour 24th Feb 2006 23:37

I should add that helo-affil is some of the most enjoyable flying I've done as a FJ bloke ... great fun

SARREMF 25th Feb 2006 07:36

Chaps, great reading but ..... are you not gettig slightly close to BEADWINDOW!
Lights touch paper. Stands back ...... evade go.
I did like the undo straps and run up and down the cabin!
F3 vs Sea King fighter affil mid 90's. 40 mins in, still no F3's - they are airborne and in the correct hemisphere but alas on the wrong island.
Debrief and rebrief for another go on next shift. Quote from their Boss. Anychance you could do it over Lafona? [ that gives the location away - for those that haven't been, Lafona (not sure on spelling), is the flatest most depressing area of the the Falklands, if we did it there [fighter affil], they would be able to see us from the runway even if we were 30 miles away! We politely refused and ran off to the hills. 20 mins in , radio call to F3's, were over here! Left a bit, thats it your looking at us!

Didn't go down well!

Brit55 25th Feb 2006 09:30

ASRAAM v RW
 

Originally Posted by threepointonefour
Which we have had for 3 yrs ...so I guess that all bets have been off for a while?

I think the F3s version of how to use ASRAAM leaves plenty of hope for the RW ME and mud movers yet!

Typhoon and ASRAAM on the other hand...

Evalu8ter 25th Feb 2006 20:59

3.14,
Fights On! Joking aside, I totally agree with your last post, RW/FJ affil can be some of the best flying we get on our side-a 2v2 is an excellent tool for judging the capacity of the people you fly with! We do have to be careful about the Beadwindow issue, which is why I've tried to keep my answers vague(ish..) but I would just like to say that we train for a "Red" threat so we don't derive trg benefit for our crews if you fight "blue" and stay high lobbing AMRAAM/ASRAAM at us, but most affil sorties end up in horse-trading with you guys "dumbing down" some serials for our trg. You're also right-all fights are operator dependant, I'll take a timed out F2 for that no-brainer comment. Bottom line is that we don't teach our crews to fight the F3 per se, it's just a tool to get them thinking about the problems, and we do exploit the limitations of your jet as we would any adversary's.

The Rocket 25th Feb 2006 22:22

That would be Lafonia.

Home of the worlds most southerly suspension bridge:8

Also the home of .99M, 50' beat ups:E

HEDP 26th Feb 2006 12:07

Any FJ mates fancy some FJ v Helo down in the East Anglia area please PM

TwoDeadDogs 26th Feb 2006 16:45

Hi all
Was it not the case that Israeli Mirages or A-4s destroyed an assault force of Egyptian or Syrian Mi-8s, carrying commandos, over open desert, in one of their many wars.I recall reading that a lot of the Mi-8s either flew into the ground trying to evade or were blown down by the wake of the jets and that few were lost to actual cannon strikes, or were strafed after the crews had landed and bugged out.
regards
TDD:)

US Herk 26th Feb 2006 17:21


Originally Posted by petitfromage
Whilst the USAF did get a kill on a Mil-8 with a LGB in GW1, they also V.ID'd a pair of US Army Blackhawks as Russian Hinds and shot them down in Afganistan (circa 1990).

I think you're referring to N.Iraq in '94.

Not to defend the F15 guys, but those Blackhawks were fitted with the EISS external stores & tanks that have anhedral pylons AND were painted white instead of the typical camo-green...

Data-Lynx 27th Feb 2006 17:21

Blue on Blue
 
The blue-on-blue engagement on 14 Apr 94 that US Herk refered to is also covered as a Responsibility and Accountability case study for students at Annapolis.

The F-15 pilots repositioned their aircraft five to ten miles behind the helicopters for firing passes and the flight lead notified the AWACS TAOR controller that the fighters were “Engaged.” At approximately 0730Z, the lead F-15 pilot fired an AIM-120 AMRAAM missile at the trail helicopter from a range of approximately four nautical miles. The F-15 wingman then fired an AIM-9 Sidewinder missile at the lead helicopter from an approximate range of 1.5 nautical miles. Both Black Hawk helicopters were destroyed. All 26 people on board were killed. The F-15 pilots each made two visual reconnaissance passes over the crash sites, then continued their assigned mission.
The case study notes a total of 130 documented failures occurred causing this incident.

Evalu8ter 27th Feb 2006 18:27

One of the Pumas engaged by the SHars near Shag Cove crashed during evasion, it was later discovered to be overloaded with mortar rounds, IIRC the other 2 Pumas & A109 landed on and were promptly shot up. During GW1 a Hip was shot down by repeated gun attacks from a section of A10s (now that's just not nice), F15s used an LGB on a Hind as the kinetic range of the LGB outranged the Sidewinder. Of interest, both these kills were as a result of AWACS vectoring. During the Iran/Iraq war some particularly unsporting kills occurred, including Pheonix v Super Frelon and even Maverick v Super Frelon (it was sat on an oil platform at the time). Moral of the story, don't fly a Super Frelon! The Iranians claimed a number of MiG-21s shot down by Sea Cobra cannon fire and the Iraqis claimed, amongst others, an F4 shot down by a Sagger(!) fired by a Hind. When you actually start digging you find out that a lot of this stuff has gone on over the years; it's not just fun to do!!


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:09.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.