Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
Recently I was looking into stuff to put on the Sea Jet thread, and found myself looking into things about the Type 45 Destroyer. Apart from the fact that the T45 is delayed, and has had the capabilities adjusted to help the MOD meet financial targets, there is a lot of information out there:
Richard Beedall's website has a section dedicated to the T45, the RN simply has one page, the DPA has a project fact file, and BAE Systems have a section on their website dedicated to the T45. I suspect many of the technologies used with the T45 will also be used for CVF. Now if you look at any of the pictures the flight deck seems quite large, certainly larger than a T42. Which brings me to the question: Why is it only intended to carry a single Merlin? |
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
beadwindow out
|
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
Please see PM Aeronut...
|
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
Surely to carry a single FA2 for local air defence...
*gets coat* |
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
So they can embark one of these, perhaps?
http://www.wartimememories.co.uk/ships/Walrus.jpg Gets coat, scarf, and tin hat. |
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
|
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
Don't you EVER give up WEBF???
|
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
LowObservable -
Well, you could go that route, but in the best traditions of the "Why do we always re-engineer our aircraft?" thread, you'd have to get BAES to stick Blue Vixen and four EJs in it. Why not start with a British design... http://1000aircraftphotos.com/Contri...lborg/2769.jpg :E I/C |
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
Why can't the T45 have more than one helo?
|
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
Went on deployment in an LPD with two wessex 5s and no hanger once. Just a hell of a lot of WD40!
|
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
You could get 2 Lynx on it no snags....but why would you want to put 2 Merlin on it? where would be the inprovement to OC there? What tactical advantage would it play??? Embark 2 Merlin on a T45 - Why ?
|
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
"Why not start with a British design"
Because it looks like a carp. |
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
Itīs so thereīs enough room to fit the skyhook for the GR9........
|
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
Might have a long weight for Skyhook......
Southside - surely two Merlin means more capability? As the Fleet gets smaller, carrying more helicopters will help recover some of the lost capability. One helicopters cannot be in two places at once, two of them can! Talking of Merlin - see news about an upgrade. |
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
surely two Merlin means more capability |
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
Larry Lynx any day! Soon it will be the only airborne asset belonging to the RN that will be able to fire a missile!
|
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
WEBF
You are a fool. Worse than that you are a persistent fool. Now in flight safety terms this means you are either a genius or just lucky to be alive. Discuss. Mmm, put a Merlin on the T45. If we have one thats serviceable. Oh, and that doesn't have any anti-surface capability at all. Slinky Lynx every time. Now, F*ck off. |
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
Polite as ever I see...
When/if the RN gets anti ship weapons put on the Merlin......also is there any planning for carrying Lynx/FLynx with the T45. |
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
also is there any planning for carrying Lynx/FLynx with the T45 |
Re: Type 45 Destroyer - Embarked Aviation
http://homepages.tesco.net/~paul.cro...ose/goose5.jpg
YEAH!! Get THIS badboy on the T45. AND the CVS!!!! How'd you like THEM apples, WEBF? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.