ATC Court Martial
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BDi
With respect, the case was not one of aviation law, but criminal law, about which the Judge Advocate knows a great deal. The facts of the case were about aviation, which is why expert witnesses were called, to explain technicalities and give expert opinion to the court.
contact_tower
On the contrary, courts martial (particularly against officers) are something of a rarity in the RAF, which is why they attract so much attention when they do occur.
With respect, the case was not one of aviation law, but criminal law, about which the Judge Advocate knows a great deal. The facts of the case were about aviation, which is why expert witnesses were called, to explain technicalities and give expert opinion to the court.
contact_tower
On the contrary, courts martial (particularly against officers) are something of a rarity in the RAF, which is why they attract so much attention when they do occur.
Beady Eye
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Scud-U-Like
Sorry to everyone else in this thread, undoubtedly boring you all to death now! However the FACT of this case was that the a/c were flying under RIS and one of the conditions of acceptance of the legal agreement of RIS is that the pilots are responsible for their own terrain clearance.
QED there was never any case to be brought to court.
QED there was never any case to be brought to court.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BDi
It is perfectly possible to be carrying out your job legally, but still to act negligently in the course of it.
At least we are agreed on something: this debate has run its course.
It is perfectly possible to be carrying out your job legally, but still to act negligently in the course of it.
At least we are agreed on something: this debate has run its course.