Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Fastest Jet at Low Level?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Fastest Jet at Low Level?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jan 2003, 13:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fastest Jet at Low Level?

So what was the fastest aircraft (IAS) flat out at low level ie. 500 feet agl or so?
Some numbers I've been given over the years by type qualified pilots-Phanthom 750 kts,F3 860kts, Buccaneer 560kts .
Any others especially the more modern types?I've heard the F105 (OK- hardly modern)could do 1000 kts.That can't be right, can it?
Anyone actually achieved these speeds?
Thanks.
jalbert is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2003, 20:17
  #2 (permalink)  
Lupus Domesticus
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NZ
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Saab JA 37 Viggen, 800 kts at 500' - claimed, anyway. Don't know how often it may have done that though.
BlueWolf is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2003, 20:22
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 4,187
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Well the record was taken by Red Baron, an F-104 'Bitsa' built from recovered airframes and parts by a US civilian. I understand that BAE once looked hard at sending an F3 to the low, low, low desert secure in the knowledge that the aircraft could easily exceed this record, but could not justify the costs. I believe that the Tornado (without LRMTS, without the intake mod, etc., so probably an F3) is the fastest low level jet in service.
Jackonicko is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2003, 20:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In dry power I assume nothing is faster than the Bucc.
zalt is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 06:42
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the Bucc was only good for 560 then there'd be plenty of things faster than it in dry power.
mr hanky is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 08:02
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 76
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely the F-105?
Heard a story from a USAF pilot in the 70's who flew them in Vietnam.. after dropping his bombload he headed South in the weeds and reached 1000 kts .. only to be overtaken by another 105 !!!

Cheers, TP
TyroPicard is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 10:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post Pigs might fly...

Can't the Pig do more than 1000 kts low level? (thats F111 for you non-colonial types )
Cougar is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 12:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Strictly speaking....

THRUST SSR (Others might have been faster, but none lower!)

QED!
AllTrimDoubt is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 13:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,839
Received 279 Likes on 113 Posts
Presumably you mean Thrust SSC?

'Dead Dog' could have used a great put down line when asked about what it felt like to go back to the Tornado B Mk 3 after breaking the LSR..... "Huh. Call this a fighter - I've driven faster cars......."

The whole Thrust SSC story was probably the last time Britain did something Great. With a fair bit of help from lots of private individuals and sponsors who made donations. But DD, Richard, the car and the team came back to a mostly indifferent media (except Sky News, whose live bulletins from the Black Rock Desert were excellent) and were quickly forgotten by the Great Unwashed. What a shame.
BEagle is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 13:30
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oops! SSC it is then! Thanks!
AllTrimDoubt is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 13:35
  #11 (permalink)  
 
tony draper's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Newcastle/UK
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indeed it was the sort of achievment knightoods were handed out for one time.
Now you have to be a football manager or a poxy luuvie actor.
tony draper is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 15:11
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Bit nosey aren't you
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
875kts in an F-3 but the EF-111 (Does that make it an electric pig?) that I was chasing had opening Vc!

As slack bladder would say b*gger!
Ghostflyer is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 15:46
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't find anything on the web that matches or beats that F3 speed.
rivetjoint is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 15:53
  #14 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard a tale that the test pilots couldn't get the F.3 to go beyond 810kts, despite their best efforts. Was then discovered that the ASI on the HUD wasn't calibrated beyond that. Don't know if it's true .....
Human Factor is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 18:03
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: East of Gibraltar
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have to defend the good old Bucc.

I had one at 617kts once at 100ft. It was going sideways and bucking about a bit (rudder blanking and the shock wave playing on the tailplane!).

I understand that the F-111 and the flanker are no sluggards at low level.
tu chan go is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 18:40
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Bit nosey aren't you
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bananas Bananas, I don't know of any F3 mate that hasn't gone supersonic on the deck. I saw several guys practicing out-running missiles in 1990. They were well supersonic with their own shadows nearly touching the jet. Only teasing.....

I would have thought that the big old proper jets without bypass must have been able to haul the mail. What about the 104, that had no wing, was pointy and was rated at 1.2 or so on the deck.

There is no doubt that the F-111 knocked spots off anything that I saw. The Flanker is awesome at medium altitude not sure what it is really like on the deck, a bit square at the front end.

But what about big jets? The B1 does supersonic low-level pretty well. An F3s limiting speed as per RAF regs is 750kts, the Lancer runs to about 800 (1.2) so who knows what the real limit is. Plus, an F-3 in full blower throws all the fuel (and occasionally engines) over the side in a heart beat. A B-1 could keep going forever.


Ghostflyer is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2003, 18:56
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My money would be on the F-111. Going back a few years now but the Upper Heyford jets were not so pokey (E models?) but the Lakenheath jets (Fs?) left a lightweight F-4 well behind.

Its quite entertaining seeing an oil rig going supersonic past your wingtip with an F-111 accerating away in front of you!
Chris Kebab is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2003, 11:41
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the Bone for sure

Uncle Sam's B-1B goes very very fast at very low level and for a very long time, plenty of go-go juice in the big bomber with internal fuel bladders in one of the bays
believe nothing (!) can catch it on the deck at max dash, even reaction time for manpads, Hawk or Patriot virtually nil when using the terrain contours correctly
my suggestion, a sharply coordinated squadron strenght lowlevel flyby downtown Bagdad at the early hours before opening the ground assault

also, wan't the now Museum piece TR-1 orso a mach 2 thing at the deck?

Last edited by mvand003; 20th Jan 2003 at 12:02.
mvand003 is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2003, 12:50
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the B-1B does M1.2 wonder what the B-1A would have done without all that inlet ducting.
rivetjoint is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2003, 21:12
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
May be pulling this one out of the woodwork - but isn't there the (urban myth) story of the TSR2 going supersonic throught the lake district on trials forcing the lightning trail a/c to bang up out of the turbulence?
really not is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.