Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Is an Ejection at M2.0 Survivable?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Is an Ejection at M2.0 Survivable?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th May 2024, 16:06
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 670
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Quite a famous Lightning story, John Squier ejecting over the Irish Sea well in excess of M1

https://www.lep.co.uk/yorkshire-heri...sh-sea-3203124

Treble one is offline  
Old 24th May 2024, 16:22
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: S W France
Age: 80
Posts: 263
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I was at RAF Headley Court, the Medical Rehabilitation Centre, in Jan/Feb of 1966 at the same time that Sqn Ldr Tony Svensson was there.
IIRC he told us that he was at Mach 1.6 when he ejected .
Tengah Type is offline  
Old 26th May 2024, 06:50
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 710
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
I vaguely recall a story from Red Eagles where a general rolled up at Tonopah and gifted himself a flight in one of their early model MiG-23s, an aircraft he was unfamiliar with. He attempted a high speed run at M2 but was not aware that a “safety” feature of the MiGs engine actually caused the engine to increase thrust slightly at high speeds when the pilot pulled the throttle back before subsequently reducing it, this led the General to believe the engine controls were frozen and he ejected. The seat functioned as designed with good separation and parachute deployment, but the high speed caused the chin strap on the pilot’s helmet to break his neck when his helmet caught the slipstream. On a side note I would imagine a M2 ejection at 40,000 feet to be very different from one at sea level, but I hope to never experience either.
Fonsini is offline  
Old 26th May 2024, 07:42
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London UK
Posts: 534
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Fonsini
I vaguely recall a story from Red Eagles where a general rolled up at Tonopah and gifted himself a flight in one of their early model MiG-23s, an aircraft he was unfamiliar with. He attempted a high speed run at M2 but was not aware that a “safety” feature of the MiGs engine actually caused the engine to increase thrust slightly at high speeds when the pilot pulled the throttle back before subsequently reducing it, this led the General to believe the engine controls were frozen and he ejected. The seat functioned as designed with good separation and parachute deployment, but the high speed caused the chin strap on the pilot’s helmet to break his neck when his helmet caught the slipstream. On a side note I would imagine a M2 ejection at 40,000 feet to be very different from one at sea level, but I hope to never experience either.
It wasn't just the engine controls he was worried about. From what I've read (and I'm a mere civvie trespassing in the military forum), once it was clear the throttle wasn't responding he tried to raise the nose to prevent the speed increasing beyond safe limits and the elevators were so heavy they seemed stuck as well. If he'd listened to the briefing properly he'd have known the drill was to pull back as hard as he could and wait patiently for the engine to throttle back.
Dr Jekyll is offline  
Old 26th May 2024, 14:02
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Too far South
Age: 50
Posts: 130
Received 25 Likes on 11 Posts
It is probably one of those subjective things, some people might survive others might not. The conditions have to be right. How many people survive falls from 6 miles up without a parachute?
Lomon is offline  
Old 26th May 2024, 15:36
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 0
Received 48 Likes on 23 Posts
I was under the impression that Russian hi-speed seats have a deflector plate to protect the pilots face and upper body.
No idea what their design limits speed is






Last edited by B2N2; 26th May 2024 at 18:52.
B2N2 is offline  
Old 26th May 2024, 15:38
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: on the ground
Posts: 449
Received 40 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Fonsini
I vaguely recall a story from Red Eagles where a general rolled up at Tonopah and gifted himself a flight in one of their early model MiG-23s, an aircraft he was unfamiliar with. He attempted a high speed run at M2 but was not aware that a “safety” feature of the MiGs engine actually caused the engine to increase thrust slightly at high speeds when the pilot pulled the throttle back before subsequently reducing it, this led the General to believe the engine controls were frozen and he ejected. The seat functioned as designed with good separation and parachute deployment, but the high speed caused the chin strap on the pilot’s helmet to break his neck when his helmet caught the slipstream. On a side note I would imagine a M2 ejection at 40,000 feet to be very different from one at sea level, but I hope to never experience either.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_M._Bond#Death
F-117A: The crash of General Robert M Bond
nonsense is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.