Wider Service Medal
Thread Starter
Wider Service Medal
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/o...-service-medal
Good news with the introduction of the wider service medal.A new operational medal recognising the service of personnel delivering crucial operational impact, but where the physical risk to life is lower than traditionally required for the award of an operational medal, has been announced by the Defence Secretary today.
The Wider Service Medal (WSM) medal, which has been approved by HM The King, recognises Armed Forces personnel and civilians working outside the traditional criteria of existing operational medals.
The move has been made to recognise the ever-changing nature of warfare and ensure that those fulfilling crucial roles can receive medallic recognition.
Personnel eligible for the medal are likely to include those deployed on a wide range of missions such as international coalitions and deterrence.
These operations include Royal Navy personnel serving on the UK’s continuous at sea Nuclear Deterrent, as well as maritime activity in the Middle East; Army personnel deployed as part of the UK’s reassurance to the people of Estonia; and RAF pilots and supporting ground crew deployed to Estonia and Romania as part of the UK’s commitment to the NATO air policing patrol.
The Wider Service Medal recognises the wide range of roles our personnel play in ensuring success on operations.
It also recognises the ever-changing nature of warfare, underlining the importance of operations which deter adversaries in a pre-war world.
The WSM is being introduced to recognise the changing nature of operational activity, whereby Armed Forces personnel are increasingly deployed or used to deliver operational impact but not necessarily in roles that expose them to physical risk.
This activity does not fall within the traditional, operational medallic criteria that continues to rely on ‘risk and rigour’. For the first time, the WSM will ensure that Armed Forces personnel who are delivering this type of operational effect will be eligible for medallic recognition.
Good news with the introduction of the wider service medal.A new operational medal recognising the service of personnel delivering crucial operational impact, but where the physical risk to life is lower than traditionally required for the award of an operational medal, has been announced by the Defence Secretary today.
The Wider Service Medal (WSM) medal, which has been approved by HM The King, recognises Armed Forces personnel and civilians working outside the traditional criteria of existing operational medals.
The move has been made to recognise the ever-changing nature of warfare and ensure that those fulfilling crucial roles can receive medallic recognition.
Personnel eligible for the medal are likely to include those deployed on a wide range of missions such as international coalitions and deterrence.
These operations include Royal Navy personnel serving on the UK’s continuous at sea Nuclear Deterrent, as well as maritime activity in the Middle East; Army personnel deployed as part of the UK’s reassurance to the people of Estonia; and RAF pilots and supporting ground crew deployed to Estonia and Romania as part of the UK’s commitment to the NATO air policing patrol.
Defence Secretary Grant Shapps said:
Our modern Armed Forces are among the best in the world and do incredible work across the globe.The Wider Service Medal recognises the wide range of roles our personnel play in ensuring success on operations.
It also recognises the ever-changing nature of warfare, underlining the importance of operations which deter adversaries in a pre-war world.
The WSM is being introduced to recognise the changing nature of operational activity, whereby Armed Forces personnel are increasingly deployed or used to deliver operational impact but not necessarily in roles that expose them to physical risk.
This activity does not fall within the traditional, operational medallic criteria that continues to rely on ‘risk and rigour’. For the first time, the WSM will ensure that Armed Forces personnel who are delivering this type of operational effect will be eligible for medallic recognition.
Criteria for the medal includes:
- Defined operational activity where there is evidence of operational impact that contributes to the UK objectives but does not meet the traditional medal threshold in terms of physical risk to the individual.
- The individual must have accrued 180 days’ aggregated service on eligible operations. Subsequent service of 180 days will result in the award of a bar to the medal, up to a maximum of three bars.
Top Answer
26th Mar 2024, 08:22
R and Gs
I mean no offence but maybe you should just be happy for those that do get it (not me) and accept that you served at a different time and did a good job.
BV
BV
R and Gs
I mean no offence but maybe you should just be happy for those that do get it (not me) and accept that you served at a different time and did a good job.
BV
BV
The following 10 users liked this post by Bob Viking:
The following 3 users liked this post by minigundiplomat:
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,923
Received 2,845 Likes
on
1,215 Posts
It does feel like they are handing them out like smarties, a retention aid?
I for one could never fathom out the reasoning behind the accumulated service medal, surely a simple bar or rosette added to the existing GSM would have sufficed.
I am happy for those that receive it, they deserve it, but it still feels an odd one.
..
I for one could never fathom out the reasoning behind the accumulated service medal, surely a simple bar or rosette added to the existing GSM would have sufficed.
I am happy for those that receive it, they deserve it, but it still feels an odd one.
..
The following users liked this post:
One might cry 'O tempora, o mores!' but I think those of us served when pterodactyls filled the skies need to accept that attitudes have changed and some of the younger generation expect recognition where private satisfaction for a job well done was what deemed sufficient in the past.
All medals have had a start date for eligibility, I presume 2018 has been chosen because that's when MOD flagged up it was going to happen, There is an argument it should be backdated to 2012 when the Holmes review suggested a need for it.
Part of me wonders what those who criticise think of the SAM without rosette, particular for those whose service was between the ceasefire and the arrival of F-4s at Stanley.
All medals have had a start date for eligibility, I presume 2018 has been chosen because that's when MOD flagged up it was going to happen, There is an argument it should be backdated to 2012 when the Holmes review suggested a need for it.
Part of me wonders what those who criticise think of the SAM without rosette, particular for those whose service was between the ceasefire and the arrival of F-4s at Stanley.
The only two members of the Royal Family who've earned campaign medals, are banned from wearing them by the others; one of whom is a non-sweating WAFU and very questionable to be fair....
The following 2 users liked this post by minigundiplomat:
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 146 Likes
on
28 Posts
Whilst I have no issue with the idea behind this medal and indeed the range of GSMs available for pretty much every operational deployment it does rather jar with the resistance put up for so many years against awarding a campaign medal to the members of Bomber Command who faced risk to life of a completely different order.
The following 5 users liked this post by Ken Scott:
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,923
Received 2,845 Likes
on
1,215 Posts
My only concern is it isn't possibly all encompassing, not a problem giving it to people based in Cyprus supporting the mission in the likes of Syria, I.e. the Sqns Engineers and Pilots etc.
But then should that not also encompass those serving in the messes in Cyprus, or the clothing stores, or any other unit on the station, as they are all backing up those Sqns, you could then argue so are those at their home base in the U.K ensuring spares, equipment and change overs for those Squadrons along with a myriad of other tasks are contributing to the task in Syria, are they to be ignored for simply being UK based? The Airforce support system does not stop at the gates of Akrotiri.
But then should that not also encompass those serving in the messes in Cyprus, or the clothing stores, or any other unit on the station, as they are all backing up those Sqns, you could then argue so are those at their home base in the U.K ensuring spares, equipment and change overs for those Squadrons along with a myriad of other tasks are contributing to the task in Syria, are they to be ignored for simply being UK based? The Airforce support system does not stop at the gates of Akrotiri.
The Airforce support system barely started at the gates of Akrotiri. Those of us there for Ops generally found those posted there to be as unhelpful as possible (probably because we had ruined their 3 year holiday in the sun)
The following 7 users liked this post by Lomon:
Interesting to see that the OP refers to "Personnel eligible for the medal are likely to include those deployed on a wide range of missions such as international coalitions and deterrence.
These operations include Royal Navy personnel serving on the UK’s continuous at sea Nuclear Deterrent...." which is exactly what the Royal Navy Deterrent Patrol Pin was designed to cover, so looks like possible dual recognition.
That said, I can't help feeling that both the name of the award and the colour scheme of the ribbon appear distinctly underwhelming....
Jack
These operations include Royal Navy personnel serving on the UK’s continuous at sea Nuclear Deterrent...." which is exactly what the Royal Navy Deterrent Patrol Pin was designed to cover, so looks like possible dual recognition.
That said, I can't help feeling that both the name of the award and the colour scheme of the ribbon appear distinctly underwhelming....
Jack
I can't believe that standards have dropped so far that there have been no comments on the headline grammar: "Operational medals is broadened with the new Wider Service Medal"
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,923
Received 2,845 Likes
on
1,215 Posts
Maybe the King realising he might not be around much longer was determined to get his head on a medal. 
Try being a transiting soldier to or from a full blown theatre of war…
The following 3 users liked this post by Sloppy Link:
