Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

General Atomics tests submarine detection with MQ-9B uncrewed aircraft

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

General Atomics tests submarine detection with MQ-9B uncrewed aircraft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Mar 2024, 11:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,037
Received 2,912 Likes on 1,247 Posts
General Atomics tests submarine detection with MQ-9B uncrewed aircraft

I suppose the next step would be to give it the capabiity to prosecute an attack?





GA-ASI Tests Sonobuoy Dispensing System with MQ-9B SeaGuardian

SAN DIEGO – 20 March 2024 – On Feb. 27, 2024, General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. (GA-ASI), in cooperation with the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR), conducted a series of tests on GA-ASI’s Sonobuoy Dispensing System (SDS) using the MQ-9B SeaGuardian® Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) on the U.S. Navy’s W-291 test range in southern California.

GA-ASI’s SeaGuardian flew the full test flight event configured with the SDS pod and SeaVue multi-role radar from Raytheon, an RTX business. During the test, the SDS pod dropped eight AN/SSQ-53 and two AN/SSQ-62 sonobuoys. Upon dispensing, the sonobuoys were successfully monitored by the SeaGuardian’s onboard Sonobuoy Monitoring and Control System (SMCS).

“This was a very successful demonstration of our SDS capability,” said GA-ASI President David R. Alexander. “The demonstration helped us prove out the SDS, which is an important component for our Anti-Submarine Warfare capability.”

The SeaGuardian was flown under a NAVAIR Interim Flight Clearance. The SDS pod is fitted with an advanced pneumatic ejection system developed, designed, and manufactured by AEREA in Italy. AEREA also supplies the internal structure assembly.

MQ-9B SeaGuardian is a medium-altitude, long-endurance RPA system. Its multi-domain capabilities allow it to flex from mission to mission. SeaGuardian has been used by the U.S. in several recent demonstrations, including Northern Edge, Integrated Battle Problem and Group Sail. The aircraft is currently being operated by the Japan Coast Guard (JCG) and the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF).

About GA-ASI

General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. (GA-ASI), an affiliate of General Atomics, is a leading designer and manufacturer of proven, reliable RPA systems, radars, and electro-optic and related mission systems, including the Predator® RPA series and the Lynx® Multi-mode Radar. With more than eight million flight hours, GA-ASI provides long-endurance, mission-capable aircraft with integrated sensor and data link systems required to deliver persistent situational awareness. The company also produces a variety of sensor control/image analysis software, offers pilot training and support services, and develops meta-material antennas. For more information, visit www.ga-asi.com
https://www.ga.com/ga-asi-tests-sono...9b-seaguardian
NutLoose is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2024, 12:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,285
Received 132 Likes on 86 Posts
What makes an MQ-9B a SeaGuardian is the mission pod(s) carried. Essentialy it is a SkyGuardian so presumably has the same weapons capabilities, early images produced by GA-ASI included carriage of lightweight torpedoes, however I haven't seen anything about integration or trials. The preferred plan though (US and India for example) appears to be using the UAV to perform the search and P-8s or Helos to prosecute the attack.

Coupled with the STOL kit, I would not be suprised to see some additional Protectors (RM2?) being acquired for a couple of CVs based near me in the medium term.
SLXOwft is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2024, 12:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Here 'n' there!
Posts: 591
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by SLXOwft
................................ The preferred plan though (US and India for example) appears to be using the UAV to perform the search and P-8s or Helos to prosecute the attack.............
Or prosecuted by ...... https://www.navylookout.com/killing-...ines-by-drone/

Worked with a young guy on traditional aircraft and, at the end of his contract, the only work he could find was on a UAV programme. He was most upset!!!!

I did say that "every cloud has a silver lining" and, 8 years on, I think my words have come true and he has ironically set himself up for life in a boom industry!
Hot 'n' High is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 21st Mar 2024, 15:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,452
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
That's a big, and expensive, piece of kit just to enable you to dispense 10 sonobuoys (reported capacity of SDS is 10 A size buoys or 20 G size).

How long will that load last in the detection, and prosecution, of a hostile submarine?
Biggus is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 21st Mar 2024, 15:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: England
Posts: 539
Received 247 Likes on 127 Posts
Originally Posted by Biggus
That's a big, and expensive, piece of kit just to enable you to dispense 10 sonobuoys (reported capacity of SDS is 10 A size buoys or 20 G size).

How long will that load last in the detection, and prosecution, of a hostile submarine?
Have lots of drones with lots of buoys. No fatigue for the crew.
DogTailRed2 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2024, 18:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,285
Received 132 Likes on 86 Posts
It can carry them on four hard points simultaneously so up to 80 Gs.
SLXOwft is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2024, 18:34
  #7 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Received 180 Likes on 106 Posts
Originally Posted by DogTailRed2
Have lots of drones with lots of buoys. No fatigue for the crew.
I think the point is that having lots of MQ-9s is not a cheap exercise at nearly 40mil USD eachShepherd estimate
PPRuNeUser0211 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2024, 21:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 2,698
Received 934 Likes on 553 Posts
How would the loiter time on station be compared with a conventional alternative I wonder?
Ninthace is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2024, 21:43
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,452
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
Open source quoted endurance of MQ-9B is 40 hours - internet search can provide the answer in seconds.

But you'll run out of sonobuoys well before then, even with a load of 80. So it's an irrelevant comparison.

Or are you proposing one UAV loiters to monitor the buoys, while a succession of others comes in and out to deploy them?

Last edited by Biggus; 21st Mar 2024 at 21:53.
Biggus is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2024, 21:48
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 2,698
Received 934 Likes on 553 Posts
I was not proposing anything, I was asking a question. Prosecuting a submarine that does not want to be found can be a time consuming business.
Ninthace is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2024, 10:09
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 529
Received 171 Likes on 92 Posts
Originally Posted by Biggus
Open source quoted endurance of MQ-9B is 40 hours - internet search can provide the answer in seconds.

But you'll run out of sonobuoys well before then, even with a load of 80. So it's an irrelevant comparison.

Or are you proposing one UAV loiters to monitor the buoys, while a succession of others comes in and out to deploy them?
I think that quoted endurance is at angels plenty. Would be interesting to see what accuracy level you can get dropping a buoy from up there.

I agree - the number of buoys carried is unlikely to allow anything like that sort of ToS.

It's a solution looking for a problem.
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2024, 15:39
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,037
Received 2,912 Likes on 1,247 Posts
Originally Posted by pba_target
I think the point is that having lots of MQ-9s is not a cheap exercise at nearly 40mil USD eachShepherd estimate
But the savings in fuel costs, maintenance costs, crew wages and galley pies must be substantial over a year period compared to a Poseidon, plus it can expand the area being covered by a Poseidon as I assume a Poseidon will be able to track its bouys as well?
NutLoose is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2024, 20:59
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 2,698
Received 934 Likes on 553 Posts
I would each one would amortise its cost in savings in pies, butties and nutty bars within a year or so.
Ninthace is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.