Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RCAF Retires Hawk & Pilot Trng in Canada

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RCAF Retires Hawk & Pilot Trng in Canada

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Mar 2024, 21:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,452
Received 1,611 Likes on 737 Posts
RCAF Retires Hawk & Pilot Trng in Canada

https://theaviationist.com/2024/03/11/farewell-ct-155/

Farewell CT-155: RCAF Retires Hawks, Halting Pilot Training Within Canada

On March 8, 2024, the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) announced that it will officially be retiring its fleet of CT-155 Hawk advanced trainer aircraft. 419 Tactical Fighter Training Squadron (419e Escadron d’entraînement à l’appui tactique), in charge of training the RCAF’s fixed wing fighter pilots, have held a cessation of operation ceremony last Friday in Cold Lake, Alberta.

The occasion also marked the beginning of a period of hiatus for the RCAF’s fixed wing training ops. This decision stems from the air force’s decision to transition its current
CF-18 fleet to the F-35A. As of now it is yet unknown how long the RCAF will cease its flight training ops for.

The decision to phase out the aging CT-155 fleet has been long forthcoming. With the RCAF’s contract with CAE for training its pilots on the CT-155 ending this year and the decision to acquire F-35s approved, the time to overhaul the Hawks have finally come.

The CT-155 Hawks, originally built to the Hawk 115 standard, is based on a 30 plus year old design at heart, despite its upgrades. A total of 22 aircraft were initially delivered to the RCAF, mainly flying with 419 squadron and a handful with 2 Canadian Forces Flying Training School (CFFTS / 2e École de pilotage des Forces canadiennes)…..

However, with the RCAF’s decision to replace the aging CF-18 fleet with the F-35A, the need for a new training jet to prepare for the 5th generation fighter has become apparent. Especially with the Canadian government’s deal to buy 88 F-35As being announced on Jan. 9, 2023, the Hawk fleet have started to become outdated.

While the RCAF is in search for a suitable training aircraft, the national fast jet training program has been put on hold.

During its period of hiatus, the RCAF will partner with its allies to train their future fighter pilots. One of the first steps of this interim solution is mainly through the Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training (ENJJPT) program based at Sheppard Air Base, Texas.

Future RCAF pilots will also be diverted to other NATO countries with similar programs such as the Fighter Lead-in Training (FLT) in Finland and the
International Flight Training School in Italy…..
ORAC is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 12th Mar 2024, 15:43
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,371
Received 553 Likes on 151 Posts
Moosa Aswayita

As an ex member of 419 I can’t allow this to pass without comment. Here’s hoping the glacial Canadian procurement process can find a replacement and bring back the Might Moose.

BV
Bob Viking is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by Bob Viking:
Old 12th Mar 2024, 17:59
  #3 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Received 180 Likes on 106 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
As an ex member of 419 I can’t allow this to pass without comment. Here’s hoping the glacial Canadian procurement process can find a replacement and bring back the Might Moose.

BV
Same same. I always said the best job I had in the RAF was in the RCAF!
PPRuNeUser0211 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 12th Mar 2024, 21:22
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 494
Received 48 Likes on 15 Posts
Why do the USAF still use T-38's? What can the T-38 do that a Hawk can not?
WB627 is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2024, 21:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,387
Received 223 Likes on 102 Posts
What can the T-38 do that a Hawk can not?
​​​​​​​Exceed Mach 1?
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2024, 21:47
  #6 (permalink)  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: The Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,713
Received 287 Likes on 130 Posts
As neither Mod nor Admin
I saw this in wikipedia:
The original T-45A, which became operational in 1991, contained an analog cockpit design, while the newer T-45C, which was first delivered in December 1997, features a new digital "glass cockpit" design. All T-45A aircraft currently in operational use are upgraded to T-45C standard. The T-45 is to remain in service until 2035 or later.
​​​​​​​The American Navy still uses the T-45C Goshawk to train its jet pilots.
Some of those pilots go on to fly F-35 C or F-35B.
Will Canada perhaps send their pilots south to keep their fast jet training program going?
T28B is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2024, 23:22
  #7 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Received 180 Likes on 106 Posts
Originally Posted by T28B
As neither Mod nor Admin
I saw this in wikipedia:

The American Navy still uses the T-45C Goshawk to train its jet pilots.
Some of those pilots go on to fly F-35 C or F-35B.
Will Canada perhaps send their pilots south to keep their fast jet training program going?
​​​​​​​Yes, but to the T-38 at ENJJPT in Texas, not to the Navy.
PPRuNeUser0211 is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2024, 01:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,371
Received 553 Likes on 151 Posts
WB627

Originally Posted by WB627
Why do the USAF still use T-38's? What can the T-38 do that a Hawk can not?
To answer your question in one word - fly.

The RCAF Hawks were all out of fatigue hours. The owners did not do any sort of airframe life extension programmes and they simply got too old to carry on. They were very well used and abused over the years.

BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2024, 10:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: East Yorkshire
Age: 75
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
How quickly time flies. It does not seem like just over 20 years ago that I and a couple of other BAE Systems engineers were in Moose Jaw carrying out a trial installation of a mod to correct a centreline tank contents indication problem. I know the aircraft does not have a tank fitted in the picture but this was an initial flight test with a clean aircraft to provide a datum set of parameters.

walbut is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 13th Mar 2024, 12:59
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 183
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Just out of interest what does the cockpit of the ENJJPTS T 38s at Shepherd look like. Have they all been been upgraded to T38c with a fully digital fit?
ASRAAMTOO is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2024, 13:16
  #11 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Received 180 Likes on 106 Posts
Originally Posted by ASRAAMTOO
Just out of interest what does the cockpit of the ENJJPTS T 38s at Shepherd look like. Have they all been been upgraded to T38c with a fully digital fit?
They're definitely T-38C. Not sure if you'd call it 'fully digital' but it's pretty much on a par with the CT-155 - an early 00's glass cockpit with standby analogue.

2007 photo of T-38C cockpit
PPRuNeUser0211 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 13th Mar 2024, 13:53
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Squalor
Posts: 174
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Ascend Charlie
Exceed Mach 1?


​​​​​​​In the Hawker Siddely shallow dive, an easy M1.01
Wetstart Dryrun is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2024, 14:37
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,371
Received 553 Likes on 151 Posts
Supersonic

There was a photo behind the Ops Desk at 419 Sqn showing a Hawk CT155 HUD screenshot with Mach 1.2. Not such a shallow dive. And not such a gentle pull out either.

BV
Bob Viking is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 14th Mar 2024, 00:01
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: East Riding
Posts: 76
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
They were certainly well operated; up to 500 fhrs per year per airframe, compared to, typically, 200-250 for RAF Hawks. But I am surprised at the news as the fleet were undergoing continuous fatigue mod updates (in my day).
teeonefixer is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2024, 09:19
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Westnoreastsouth
Posts: 1,827
Received 33 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by Wetstart Dryrun
In the Hawker Siddely shallow dive, an easy M1.01
The BBC series 'Bang goes the theory' filmed an episode at ETPS Boscombe Down in 2010/2011 with Dallas Campbell flying with Rhys W in Hawk XX341,the reason they used 341 is that it was normally flown solo from the rear cockpit (the a/c was heavily modified to have a VSS system for the front seat [student] occupant,the rear seat controls were still directly mechanically connected to the control system) so that Dallas could sit in the front seat for filming.
The mach dive was done over the Brizzle Channel,the inside shots were filmed in the (specially cleared out) ETPS Helicopter Hangar.
The Hawk footage starts at approx 7.00 and as an added bonus you even see my best side - wiggling hands very briefly
Hawk experts will also notice that the rear cockpit pin stowages are still in their original position on the canopy sill,there was insufficient room on the Glare Shields for the later flip up stowages.


Last edited by longer ron; 14th Mar 2024 at 22:47. Reason: adding text
longer ron is online now  
Old 14th Mar 2024, 15:17
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The 24th & a Half Century
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by teeonefixer
They were certainly well operated; up to 500 fhrs per year per airframe, compared to, typically, 200-250 for RAF Hawks. But I am surprised at the news as the fleet were undergoing continuous fatigue mod updates (in my day).
That’s an interesting number which would put them well over 10,000hrs on the frame. Out of interest how much did the DND pay in terms of support contracts to enable such an unheard of availability rate.
DuckDodgers is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2024, 22:48
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cayley's County - Yorkshire
Posts: 293
Received 41 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by DuckDodgers
That’s an interesting number which would put them well over 10,000hrs on the frame. Out of interest how much did the DND pay in terms of support contracts to enable such an unheard of availability rate.
It wasn't just a case of paying via a support contract to get the high availability rates. The Mk115 fleet were civil owned and were only making money when flying. NFTC, buying the recommended spares package and flying the aircraft regularly, were rewarded with an airframe that was very reliable. A number of Hawk operators also demonstrated that, albeit not to the same extent. Several also demonstrated the result of the opposite approach.
CAEBr is offline  
The following users liked this post:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.