Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Reds Diamond Season and 60th

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Reds Diamond Season and 60th

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Feb 2024, 11:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,153
Received 101 Likes on 54 Posts
Reds Diamond Season and 60th

https://www.raf.mod.uk/display-teams...fRm5VscG0iKcSg





cheers
chopper2004 is offline  

Top Answer

9th Feb 2024, 11:41
Mogwi
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 350/3 Compton
Age: 76
Posts: 789
Received 378 Likes on 95 Posts
Von Richthofen remarked, the day before he died, that 80 was a good number. Perhaps 60 should be a “good number” for the Reds, given the parlours state of the RAF at present and the gathering storm to the East.

I am afraid that the recruitment value of the team has, long ago, evaporated and the personnel could be far better employed elsewhere.

Mog
Old 9th Feb 2024, 11:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 350/3 Compton
Age: 76
Posts: 789
Received 378 Likes on 95 Posts
Von Richthofen remarked, the day before he died, that 80 was a good number. Perhaps 60 should be a “good number” for the Reds, given the parlours state of the RAF at present and the gathering storm to the East.

I am afraid that the recruitment value of the team has, long ago, evaporated and the personnel could be far better employed elsewhere.

Mog
Mogwi is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2024, 11:52
  #3 (permalink)  
6Z3
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: God's Country
Posts: 646
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
In the FAA perhaps, eh Mog
6Z3 is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by 6Z3:
Old 9th Feb 2024, 14:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: England
Posts: 533
Received 247 Likes on 127 Posts
I still enjoy seeing them at air shows but my impression of the team has been dampened by recent events. Their `esprit de corps` has been tarnished some what.
DogTailRed2 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2024, 14:54
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lost again...
Posts: 900
Received 120 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by Mogwi
Von Richthofen remarked, the day before he died, that 80 was a good number. Perhaps 60 should be a “good number” for the Reds, given the parlours state of the RAF at present and the gathering storm to the East.

I am afraid that the recruitment value of the team has, long ago, evaporated and the personnel could be far better employed elsewhere.

Mog
I'm sad to say that I'm inclined to agree. Recruitment value - negligible (and we can't train the pilots that we do recruit). Overseas sales of the hawk value - nil - we don't make it anymore. Positive publicity and good PR value: Nil sadly.

Plus they cost a flaming fortune that we simply can't afford and use resources that, as Mog says, really should be elsewhere.

Never thought i'd say it but I think it may be time to hang up the red suits.

OvertHawk is offline  
The following 4 users liked this post by OvertHawk:
Old 9th Feb 2024, 15:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Budapest
Posts: 313
Received 206 Likes on 122 Posts
Should quit while the great reputation remains (almost) intact.
Expatrick is online now  
Old 9th Feb 2024, 15:41
  #7 (permalink)  
Thought police antagonist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,371
Received 116 Likes on 83 Posts
Originally Posted by OvertHawk
I'm sad to say that I'm inclined to agree. Recruitment value - negligible (and we can't train the pilots that we do recruit). Overseas sales of the hawk value - nil - we don't make it anymore. Positive publicity and good PR value: Nil sadly.

Plus they cost a flaming fortune that we simply can't afford and use resources that, as Mog says, really should be elsewhere.

Never thought i'd say it but I think it may be time to hang up the red suits.
In which case, this year would be perfect for their finale
Krystal n chips is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 9th Feb 2024, 20:50
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dark side of the Moon
Posts: 682
Received 68 Likes on 35 Posts
They'd better be on their best behaviour - the press will be watching them like a... well, like a Hawk, I suppose.
Fly-by-Wife is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 9th Feb 2024, 21:30
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The 24th & a Half Century
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Their utility is akin to UASs, the QFIs could be better employed elsewhere!
DuckDodgers is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2024, 13:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,924
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by DuckDodgers
Their utility is akin to UASs, the QFIs could be better employed elsewhere!
What QFI's?
pr00ne is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2024, 13:54
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Indeed pr00ne! Not just RAFAT, but even UASs have precious few QFIs these days, sadly.

There was enough 'fat' in the system pre-GW1 to spring some QFIs back to the front line after a couple of weeks of refresher flying, but with the advent of MFTS any flexibility has long since disappeared.

A surge in pilot training simply couldn't happen these days - there aren't enough aircraft, aerodromes, instructors or ground crew capable of coping with any large demand.

I read recently that the largest UAS was only capable of achieving 6 first solos, 2 first solo sector recces and 1 first aerobatic solo in an entire year......
BEagle is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2024, 13:57
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Location: Location!
Posts: 2,302
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by chopper2004
Will this make them all Diamond geezers?

Jack
Union Jack is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 10th Feb 2024, 19:17
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Uranus
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Font

I'm not exactly sure when they changed it - but THAT font for Royal Air Force just looks so tacky somehow with the out of balance slanty letters.
Shaft109 is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2024, 19:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: England
Posts: 533
Received 247 Likes on 127 Posts
Lots of comment about the Pilots and resources would be better deployed elsewhere.
Are we saying the resources to fund and operate the Red Arrows is stretching our military?
That's damming isn't it for one of the richest countries in the world?
DogTailRed2 is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2024, 20:11
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,058
Received 24 Likes on 11 Posts
What's more damning ...

...
What's more damning is that they seem to be still carrying pax in the back seat without command eject (front ejects back) and they seem to be still using the out of date scissors shackle ejector seat, rather than the gas shackle mod that was offered and refused some twenty years ago for Hawk, but accepted for Tonkas. Viz: XX177 and XX204 in particular.

LFH
Lordflasheart is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by Lordflasheart:
Old 10th Feb 2024, 20:27
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: York
Posts: 627
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
The scissor shackle worked perfectly well when it was serviced regularly in the ejection seat bay at unit level. It was only when seat servicing was extended incrementally over a few years and the demise of unit seat bays that a frig had to be invented to open the shackle in the cockpit in order to do out of phase work!
dctyke is offline  
The following 5 users liked this post by dctyke:
Old 10th Feb 2024, 23:01
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Teesside
Posts: 258
Received 12 Likes on 4 Posts
A surge in pilot training simply couldn't happen these days - there aren't enough aircraft, aerodromes, instructors or ground crew capable of coping with any large demand.
I read recently that the largest UAS was only capable of achieving 6 first solos, 2 first solo sector recces and 1 first aerobatic solo in an entire year .


RAF Valley Graduation on Friday , 9 February , saw 3 pilots awarded their wings ;

"Masters of the Air!

Three more Valley students were awarded their coveted wings today as their proud mums, dads and partners watched on. The 'wings' were awarded by Air Vice Marshal Mark Flewin CBE, Air Officer Commanding 1 Group."

Last edited by David Thompson; 11th Feb 2024 at 00:12. Reason: Formatting
David Thompson is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 11th Feb 2024, 07:57
  #18 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Received 180 Likes on 106 Posts
Originally Posted by BEagle
Indeed pr00ne! Not just RAFAT, but even UASs have precious few QFIs these days, sadly.

There was enough 'fat' in the system pre-GW1 to spring some QFIs back to the front line after a couple of weeks of refresher flying, but with the advent of MFTS any flexibility has long since disappeared.

A surge in pilot training simply couldn't happen these days - there aren't enough aircraft, aerodromes, instructors or ground crew capable of coping with any large demand.

I read recently that the largest UAS was only capable of achieving 6 first solos, 2 first solo sector recces and 1 first aerobatic solo in an entire year......
Not sure how much of that was down to QFI availability and how much of that was down to aircraft? The Tutor has had some pretty dreadful availability the last couple of years (prop, control surfaces, etc), and every time it comes back you immediately lose all the QFIs to refreshing AEF staff.
PPRuNeUser0211 is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2024, 08:02
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lost again...
Posts: 900
Received 120 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by DogTailRed2
Lots of comment about the Pilots and resources would be better deployed elsewhere.
Are we saying the resources to fund and operate the Red Arrows is stretching our military?
That's damming isn't it for one of the richest countries in the world?
Yes I am and, yes it is.

OvertHawk is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2024, 10:37
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: glasgow
Posts: 297
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Not only are the Reds no longer productive in terms of their original objectives, I believe that they are now actively counter productive to the interests of the RAF in that they portray a false impression of the underlying state of the organisation. How many operational units could muster 9 serviceable aircraft simultaneously for the same number of days as the Reds display?
falcon900 is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.