Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Irish Air Corps - what's going on here ?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Irish Air Corps - what's going on here ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Feb 2024, 15:32
  #1 (permalink)  
7AC
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Out West
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Irish Air Corps - what's going on here ?

https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/...t-1584248.html
7AC is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 16:07
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,819
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
The IAC's Learjet 45 has just celebrated its 20th birthday. It's a frequent sight over this side of the water, for obvious reasons, but it hasn't been seen much over the last 3 months or so.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 18:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: England
Posts: 400
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This hissy-fit seems to arise from the Learjet being unavailable to take a minister from Dublin to Brussels. Anyone else flying that route (those without private aircraft) have to endure airport hassle and then the delights of Aer Lingus or even Ryanair. Perhaps the minister should try that experience?
OldLurker is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 20:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Róisín Dubh
Posts: 1,389
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Spending money on Aer Corps equipment always terrifies Irish Governments. This Learjet was always the second fiddle to a Gulstream IV until that needed major overhaul in the Gulfstream factory. The Government dithered over whether to spend the required funds on the airframe until Gulfstream told them to make up their mind, whereupon it was sold to Gulfstream for apittance along with various spares (including an engine), who then overhauled it and sold it at a massive profit.

That Gulstream was supposed to be replaced by an A319 a few years earlier, but the public backlash ended that. This LJ likely has the most cycles of any in the world (like the Gulf IV did).
Una Due Tfc is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 23:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Seattle
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
And a basic subscription to Netjets would save millions
BoeingDriver99 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 23:38
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Western Europe
Posts: 300
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Nearly all the opposition in Ireland is very leftwing so a government jet is easy ammo despite the fact that every state has an air transport arm in the military, every incoming government will keep one and the aircraft is multi role (it is a highly effective air ambulance).
All AIC equipment tends to be very multi role anyway, such is the nature of operation.
Consol is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 6th Feb 2024, 09:07
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Botswana
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Look over there !

Originally Posted by Consol
Nearly all the opposition in Ireland is very leftwing so a government jet is easy ammo despite the fact that every state has an air transport arm in the military, every incoming government will keep one and the aircraft is multi role (it is a highly effective air ambulance).
All AIC equipment tends to be very multi role anyway, such is the nature of operation.
it is not a “fact” that every state has an air transport arm in the military , some states that can’t afford it or don’t need it, or have a history of violent colonial militaristic rule , don’t have a military at all . Even states that can justify a military have in the past opted to remove the governments air transport arm , one notable one after the president and his senior civilian officials perished in the care of their “elite” flying servants .
Belfast formation is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 6th Feb 2024, 10:03
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Location: Location!
Posts: 2,302
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by BoeingDriver99
And a basic subscription to Netjets would save millions
So someone probably decided that it would be more economical to sign up with Netflix instead....

Jack
Union Jack is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2024, 15:25
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Luberon
Age: 72
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Una Due Tfc
Spending money on Aer Corps equipment always terrifies Irish Governments.
How dare they spend money on their own air defence, that's now a job for the Royal Air Force!
sitigeltfel is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 6th Feb 2024, 15:37
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Botswana
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Look over there !

It’s not their own defence - there is no aerial threat to Ireland except the one made up by those with vested interests - & the dublin zoo “meerkats” who watch too much TV. If the UK govt decides Irish airspace is a threat corridor to them then they should police it & pay for it. The biggest “threat” would be an air to air collision with an airliner or similar catastrophic mishap involving civilians by a fighter more than likely by a homegrown operator or far less likely by one of a neighbouring state -and that increased risk is precisely why Ireland should not squander tax payers money on a deluded doomed project to protect UK airspace. Only an idiot would spend vast sums of money on something already provided competently for free for which there is no actual need .
Belfast formation is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 6th Feb 2024, 15:59
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Co. Down
Age: 82
Posts: 832
Received 241 Likes on 75 Posts
Hell hath no fury like a politician denied his/her trip on a private jet.
Geriaviator is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2024, 21:11
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,201
Received 401 Likes on 248 Posts
Originally Posted by Belfast formation
It’s not their own defence - there is no aerial threat to Ireland except the one made up by those with vested interests - & the dublin zoo “meerkats” who watch too much TV. If the UK govt decides Irish airspace is a threat corridor to them then they should police it & pay for it. The biggest “threat” would be an air to air collision with an airliner or similar catastrophic mishap involving civilians by a fighter more than likely by a homegrown operator or far less likely by one of a neighbouring state -and that increased risk is precisely why Ireland should not squander tax payers money on a deluded doomed project to protect UK airspace. Only an idiot would spend vast sums of money on something already provided competently for free for which there is no actual need .
OK, I'll put you down for "votes against" on the tally sheet.
(But next time, please don't sugar coat it. Tell us how you really feel. )
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2024, 07:46
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: England
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
This LJ likely has the most cycles of any in the world
​​​​​​​I think the Ryan Air Lear Jets hold that accolade.
Miles Magister is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2024, 09:07
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Rhone-Alpes
Posts: 1,172
Received 281 Likes on 158 Posts
Originally Posted by Belfast formation
It’s not their own defence - there is no aerial threat to Ireland except the one made up by those with vested interests - & the dublin zoo “meerkats” who watch too much TV. If the UK govt decides Irish airspace is a threat corridor to them then they should police it & pay for it. The biggest “threat” would be an air to air collision with an airliner or similar catastrophic mishap involving civilians by a fighter more than likely by a homegrown operator or far less likely by one of a neighbouring state -and that increased risk is precisely why Ireland should not squander tax payers money on a deluded doomed project to protect UK airspace. Only an idiot would spend vast sums of money on something already provided competently for free for which there is no actual need .
The Irish government recognised some long time ago that Nature has shown the best way for an easy life.....be a parasite.

This is best illustrated by their beggar-your-neighbour international corporate tax policies ( happily now finally stamped out by EU) and the " defence policy " discussed in this thread.They should be flushed down the toilet until they recognise how to become an acceptable state. They are the N European equivalent of Hungary.

Last edited by Tartiflette Fan; 7th Feb 2024 at 11:17.
Tartiflette Fan is online now  
The following 3 users liked this post by Tartiflette Fan:
Old 7th Feb 2024, 09:23
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Budapest
Posts: 310
Received 205 Likes on 121 Posts
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
The Irish government recognisied some long time ago that Nature has shown the best way for an easy life.....be a parasite.

This is best illustrated by their beggar-your-neighbour international corporate tax policies ( happily now coming to an end ) and the " defence policy " discussed in this thread.They should be flushed down the toilet until they recognise how to become an acceptable state. They are the N European equivalent of Hungary.
At least Hungary has FJs in it's inventory.
Expatrick is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2024, 12:41
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,234
Received 50 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
The Irish government recognised some long time ago that Nature has shown the best way for an easy life.....be a parasite.

This is best illustrated by their beggar-your-neighbour international corporate tax policies ( happily now finally stamped out by EU) and the " defence policy " discussed in this thread.They should be flushed down the toilet until they recognise how to become an acceptable state. They are the N European equivalent of Hungary.
I imagine that Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania should also get off their collective backsides and provide their own air defence rather than rely on the rest of NATO then?
Martin the Martian is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 7th Feb 2024, 12:46
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,937
Received 2,851 Likes on 1,219 Posts
As Lear are no longer building jets it will be interesting how long they will be supported, damned awful things to work on.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2024, 13:16
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Rhone-Alpes
Posts: 1,172
Received 281 Likes on 158 Posts
Originally Posted by Martin the Martian
I imagine that Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania should also get off their collective backsides and provide their own air defence rather than rely on the rest of NATO then?
Amazingly moronic comment even if you are trying a foray into sarcasm/satire/irony, litotes or similar. I can't recognise which it might be as the stupidity is overwhelming.

To perhaps re-jig a phrase from a well-known film " What has Ireland ever done for NATO ? "

Last edited by Tartiflette Fan; 7th Feb 2024 at 14:04.
Tartiflette Fan is online now  
Old 7th Feb 2024, 15:33
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,201
Received 401 Likes on 248 Posts
Originally Posted by Martin the Martian
I imagine that Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania should also get off their collective backsides and provide their own air defence rather than rely on the rest of NATO then?
Since they are in NATO, and Republic of Ireland is not, I find your post to be puzzling at best.

Ireland and their situation may be more like Costa Rica, who have no army. (Ireland has an Army, and they do contribute to some UN peacekeeping operations).
They have done a risk assessment and have so far found their risk versus expected result to arrive at "don't need an Air Force / Air Defense Fighters" for reasons peculiar to their situation.
Ticos are extremely proud of the fact that they have no army. Costa Ricans put effort into differentiating themselves from many of their more troubled and violent neighbors as well as their social, political, cultural, and environmental progressive policies. Civil war has not erupted in Costa Rica since 1948. In this same period, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Mexico, and El Salvador have all had civil wars and poured a lot of money into their military. Similarly, Panama has had significant problems with a military coup in the 1980s, and only disbanded their army in 1996. Now, they are becoming more stable.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2024, 15:59
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,708
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
Or they do what the Uk did with the A320s and take elements of the Govt Flying Service out the hands of the military (and presumably the Defence budget)
Davef68 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.