Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Proposal to resurrect Finningley Air Show

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Proposal to resurrect Finningley Air Show

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Dec 2023, 03:19
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
How many of these are routinely put forward by the RAF for display purposes? My understand that displaying is now a specific task and you can only get what is allocated, so the standard Typhoon, etc
There is nothing to stop the RAF allocating any of the aircraft I mentioned for display flying. All the predeccesors of those mentioned were often seen. Hercules, all fast jets and trainers, Nimrods, VC-10s, V-Bombers, Shackletons, all were regulars at air shows. The aircraft which have taken over from that lot are not routinely allocated for display flying for a variety of reasons I expect. One will be operational commitments, but operational commitments have always been ever present and the priority. The other, apart from tighter budgeting, is simply culture change. Or what the RAF perceive as a sufficient effort to maintain positive public appeal. What I can't understand is, why they have allocated the F-35B to make very pedestrian and restrained flybys over Cosford and Fairford for the last couple of years or so.

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2023, 22:37
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,792
Received 78 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by Finningley Boy
What I can't understand is, why they have allocated the F-35B to make very pedestrian and restrained flybys over Cosford and Fairford for the last couple of years or so.
Because the F35 squadrons are busily trying to train new pilots and instructors for a growing force, while maintaining readiness for ops. And at least as importantly, as the inquiry into the QE accident observed, there are too few engineers on the squadrons for the size of the flying and operational readiness task as it is without adding a display workup and display season to the list. I presume the RAF has decided it would rather the aircraft been seen making pedestrian and restrained flybys (which is all the regulations allow without a display workup and all the supervisory overhead that goes with it) than not seen at all.
Easy Street is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Easy Street:
Old 18th Dec 2023, 23:07
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by Easy Street
Because the F35 squadrons are busily trying to train new pilots and instructors for a growing force, while maintaining readiness for ops. And at least as importantly, as the inquiry into the QE accident observed, there are too few engineers on the squadrons for the size of the flying and operational readiness task as it is without adding a display workup and display season to the list. I presume the RAF has decided it would rather the aircraft been seen making pedestrian and restrained flybys (which is all the regulations allow without a display workup and all the supervisory overhead that goes with it) than not seen at all.
The same restriction in 2019 saw a more robust "flypast" at least. Showing off the thrust vector seems to sum up the F-35B.

Last edited by Finningley Boy; 18th Dec 2023 at 23:17.
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2023, 23:50
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lost again...
Posts: 902
Received 120 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by Finningley Boy
The same restriction in 2019 saw a more robust "flypast" at least. Showing off the thrust vector seems to sum up the F-35B.
I know that "back when you were a lad" life and assets were cheap and plentiful...

Now they're not.

We've got an air force pared to the bone and anyone in their right mind that looks at what the current service is working with and says " you should be putting more effort into air displays" is quite frankly delusional!



OvertHawk is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by OvertHawk:
Old 19th Dec 2023, 00:19
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by OvertHawk
I know that "back when you were a lad" life and assets were cheap and plentiful...

Now they're not.

We've got an air force pared to the bone and anyone in their right mind that looks at what the current service is working with and says " you should be putting more effort into air displays" is quite frankly delusional!
That's right, we've reached a parlous state alright, struggling with personnel retention, struggling to get a penny packet of aeroplanes, no matter how complex, into an operational state and a single brakes on flypast by one of them at the weekend is seen as the present day equivelant of the Pterodactyl Loop!

The "you're only interested air displays" argument is a thin skinned reflex. It was always the case before and should be now, if you're going to place the service on show in public, make it worth while! As for the one and only operational "display" the Typhoon, the RAF might save some much needed cash by not frittering it on gaudy coloured paint.😁

FB

Last edited by Finningley Boy; 19th Dec 2023 at 00:32. Reason: update
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2023, 11:47
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,926
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
Seeing as the airfield owner, Peel, has closed the airfield to any flying operations and dismissed all the Air Traffic staff, this proposal is highly unlikely, actually more like totally impossible!
pr00ne is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2023, 12:12
  #27 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by pr00ne
Seeing as the airfield owner, Peel, has closed the airfield to any flying operations and dismissed all the Air Traffic staff, this proposal is highly unlikely, actually more like totally impossible!
Sounds like this Mulholland chap is being strung along?

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2023, 15:39
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ashwell
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
And the relatively nearby Flying Legends 2024 has been cancelled.
VictorGolf is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2023, 18:37
  #29 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by VictorGolf
And the relatively nearby Flying Legends 2024 has been cancelled.
They reckon 2025 is still on the cards. The same was said about the Scampton Air Show in 2017, after the hype smoke screen faded and revealed that the event wasn't quite as successful as was originally fiercely claimed to have been, there was an eventual announcement, well and truly belated, that there wouldn't be a Scampton Air Show in 2018. But, the ambition was to hold one in 2019, and the rest as they say, is history.

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2023, 18:52
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: England
Posts: 539
Received 248 Likes on 128 Posts
One of the problems is that air shows have become a victim of their own success.
Climbing into the `way back` machine for a moment The Fighter Meet at Weald in 89 had two P51's. Probably a Spitfire. Stalwarts like the RNHF, BBMF and not much else.
Yes, I'm sure the list was bigger (I can recall a black still in service Hunter) but there wasn't a lot of stuff. Some stalls. A few planes. Good commentary and that was it.
Of course your show could be spiced up with some quite nice RAF types like the Vulcan, Tornado, Jaguar, Shackleton and so on now all sadly gone.
Fuel was cheap. Entry was cheap and life was relatively cheap.
Now shows, and life is expensive. Not for what you get (you get an awesome line up of warbirds, not much modern though) but still a big chunk out of the average families budget. Blame that on the government.
I also think that the people that went to shows are now like me. Old and pot bellied. They haven't got the same draw as they used too for younger generations.
So for a show to work it needs to have a local fan base it can drawer on. Be relatively cheap, cheerful, fun and, gonna get some flack for this, be down south where most of the money is.
Hence Old Warden, Duxford, Lashenden. RIAT et al.
DogTailRed2 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2023, 19:23
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: EGSS
Posts: 13
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
Although too young to have seen the airshows of the 50s and 60s where huge formations would take to the skies, I still feel fortunate to have seen what was around in the 80s and up to the 90s (where family took priority over airshow attendance)
North Weald Fighter Meet was usually the first attendance on the calendar with a healthy mixture of old and new (a spirited performance by a fairly newish Tornado F2 in 86)
Next was the legendary Mildenhall Air Fete which was in a league of its own with its infamous hospitality (Bud and a wet burger)
This was back when the Cold War (original one) was still full on and the skies of East Anglia were almost solid aluminium.
Those days are gone and with numbers of aircraft very much down, the airshows of the past are just that. The only exception maybe RIAT but even that is a shadow of its former self.
Just my take.
Thorley1969 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2023, 20:02
  #32 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
My own first experience of an air show was at the place in question, Finningley, 1962, perched on dad's shoulders watching the Vulcan Scramble. All anti-flash white. I can still remember the air cadet or airman, running along the side of the car as we went to park, thrusting a copy of the Battle of Britain Souvenir Magazine through the open window in exchange for a few shekels and mum remarking about how cold it was. Trips down memory lane, happen more often these days.

FB

Finningley Boy is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Finningley Boy:
Old 19th Dec 2023, 21:10
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 368
Received 161 Likes on 50 Posts
I think we were in the car behind yours, FB. The annual pilgrimage!
DuncanDoenitz is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 20th Dec 2023, 01:45
  #34 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by DuncanDoenitz
I think we were in the car behind yours, FB. The annual pilgrimage!
Indeed the same for us, a very different time, 61 years ago. I was thinking, 61 years before then the aeroplane didn't exist!

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2023, 07:58
  #35 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,142
Received 224 Likes on 66 Posts
Cosford, 1952. Aged five. Fell in love with aeroplanes way back then.
Herod is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2023, 09:01
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: England
Posts: 539
Received 248 Likes on 128 Posts
Originally Posted by Herod
Cosford, 1952. Aged five. Fell in love with aeroplanes way back then.
Did they chop all their airliners? The museum didn't have many last time I visited.
DogTailRed2 is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2023, 10:32
  #37 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,142
Received 224 Likes on 66 Posts
Originally Posted by DogTailRed2
Did they chop all their airliners? The museum didn't have many last time I visited.
DogTai;Red2. It's not an airliner museum, and I believe those that were there were chopped up many years ago by Big Airways. It's a Royal Air Force museum, hence the title.
Herod is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2023, 17:25
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: the dark side
Posts: 1,112
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Finningley Boy
Sounds like this Mulholland chap is being strung along?

FB
Well the article you’ve linked to is only a couple of weeks off being a year old, 9th Jan 23… At that time the airport had only been closed four weeks

Assuming the airport stayed open, an air show to contemporary safety standards at the site would be very difficult to manage, and even prior to Shoreham and subsequent changes would have been impractical due infrastructure and commercial operations.
jumpseater is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2023, 20:28
  #39 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by jumpseater
Well the article you’ve linked to is only a couple of weeks off being a year old, 9th Jan 23… At that time the airport had only been closed four weeks

Assuming the airport stayed open, an air show to contemporary safety standards at the site would be very difficult to manage, and even prior to Shoreham and subsequent changes would have been impractical due infrastructure and commercial operations.
Its the first time I'd seen this article and found it most unlikely that anyone would give this chap the time of day given all the insurmountable factors. It would be interesting to know if the matter has yet reached a conclusion?

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.