Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Buccaneer Flying Qualities

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Buccaneer Flying Qualities

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Sep 2023, 23:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 3 Posts
Buccaneer Flying Qualities

I'm interested in pilot comments expanding on the flying qualities of the mighty Buccaneer.

I've just watched the Dave Southwood interview on YouTube about his experiences, and he described the flying qualities in 3 distinct areas;
  • 300-550KCAS - probably the best aircraft for flying low, delightful to fly.
  • Above 550KCAS - directionally not that easy - would yaw off, fin too short.
  • Landing Pattern - probably the worst handling characteristics of anything he's flown.
I've spent 30+ years as a flight test engineer on military fast jet aircraft, originally in the UK, now the USA. My hobby is radio controlled model aircraft and I have recently designed, built and flown a 1/7 scale model of the Buccaneer. At 9ft (108") long, 75" wing span, weighing 61lb at take off and powered by 2 22lb turbines with 1.5gal of Jet A it is a monster model, but very impressive looking in flight. I have incorporated drooping ailerons (flaperons) as well as the inboard flaps and the tailplane flaps and a functional speedbrake. The main gear also shrinks during retraction to fit in the wheel well. I have not attempted wing-fold nor the blow system.

The first 2 models were lost in early flight test, but as the saying goes, 3rd time's a charm and so far it has 45 flights on it.

The reason I ask about pilot comments from the full-scale Buccaneer is that my model version also has some very unique handling characteristics in the landing pattern, and I am interested to know if this is just a trait of this model, or something that has carried over from the full-scale.

In particular, when the flaps and ailerons are drooped for landing, the model exhibits a very strong tendency to roll wings level when centering the stick and has the need to hold in significant proverse aileron all the way through the turn. This has taken some effort to balance control throws and to learn the characteristic as it was so unusual compared to everything else I've flown.

Also, with the flaperons drooped, the model validated the need for the tailplane flaps to counteract the nose-down pitching moment from the flaperons, as I would run out of nose up elevator authority with the tailplane flaps at neutral.

With half speedbrake, full droop and about half power, it is very precise to fly on final approach, using power to control sink rake.

A few pictures of my model (not yet finished). If you squint I think you can tell it approximates a Buccaneer.











JSF-TC is offline  

Top Answer

12th Sep 2023, 01:15
JSF-TC
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 3 Posts
Thanks for all the comments.

Photo of me and the model for size reference.







A video shot at a recent fly-in at Houston in June. Not a long sequence for the Buccaneer, but it gives an idea.



For those interested in it's construction, follow the link below for a build thread.

RCUniverse - Buccaneer Build Thread


It was completely own-designed and scratch built from some 3-view plans, a 3D scan of a plastic model, lots of photos, the AP Maintenance manual, and a good dose of TLAR (That Looks About Right).

ORAC's links to BEagles comments were really helpful in understanding the full scale characteristics - I think if I had read those before I started, I would have chosen something more straightforward. I can confirm this particular comment in the landing pattern "At this stage the ac is very unstable in all planes and must be flown very carefully indeed." also applies to this model. It has a 3-axis rate gyro working at maximum gain settings to make it manageable.


The addition of all the maintenance stencil markings and a detailed cockpit and crew is next up.



XW547 was chosen as it was one of the few Buccaneers to retain the extended wingtips throughout it's life. It was on XII Sqn books on and off between 1974 and 1985 and again from May 1986 until disposal in 1993. It was "Guinness Girl/ Pauline/ The MacAllan" during the Gulf War.


Thanks, and let's keep the Buccaneer stories coming.
Old 10th Sep 2023, 23:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Blighty
Posts: 788
Received 87 Likes on 22 Posts
Great looking model. I've never heard of tail plane flaps before.
HOVIS is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2023, 00:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Extraordinary level of detail - well done.
tartare is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2023, 02:36
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,946
Received 394 Likes on 209 Posts
Niiiice. Great photography as well.
megan is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 11th Sep 2023, 05:24
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,818
Received 97 Likes on 70 Posts
A Buccaneer at low level (below about 3000ft) was a delight to control. At 550kts you could look for a gap in unidentified traffic some 10 miles ahead and aim the aircraft for it, knowing you would pass through easily.
When our Bucc S2 arrived, the crews did a large amount of IFR flying on airways to familiarise the navs with it; the airways controllers kept complaining it was too fast because it flew faster than 'standard' airliners (apart from the Trident) and they had to keep vectoring it in order to overtake other traffic at the same level.
chevvron is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2023, 06:10
  #6 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,418
Received 1,593 Likes on 730 Posts
Flying the Buccaneer

Buccaneer Low level

Buccaneer Performance

Buccaneer & BLC

Blackburn Buccaneer - Aerodynamic parameters/Flight Test results

ORAC is online now  
The following 2 users liked this post by ORAC:
Old 11th Sep 2023, 06:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: england
Posts: 860
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
No need to squint…that’s a beauty!
hunterboy is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2023, 08:21
  #8 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,625
Received 298 Likes on 166 Posts
Looks fantastic... a video would not go amiss!
treadigraph is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 11th Sep 2023, 13:06
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: uk
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Looks great, well done. Now you just need to rid of the silly fox decal and replace with some blue/yellow arrow thingy near the nose!
deltahotel is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 11th Sep 2023, 14:19
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chedburgh, Bury St.Edmunds
Age: 81
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Lovely model, but doesn't look so good with no crew!!!
JEM60 is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2023, 14:33
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,821
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by JSF-TC
I have not attempted wing-fold nor the blow system.
Shame on you.

Joking aside, what a fabulous-looking model - well done !
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2023, 14:44
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,810
Received 136 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by JEM60
Lovely model, but doesn't look so good with no crew!!!
Stealth crew … this is the 21st Century!

Gorgeous pice of work … my congratulations to the builder.
MPN11 is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2023, 14:49
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,975
Received 2,884 Likes on 1,231 Posts
Superb model. It really looks the part, I've enclosed a couple of pics of some of the runners still in the UK.






NutLoose is offline  
The following 6 users liked this post by NutLoose:
Old 11th Sep 2023, 15:12
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,211
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
I am not into RC, not a fan of the Bucc…have to tell you though that is one amazing model.
Did you upscale the size from an existing model, did you use plans? Can you tell us about the design process?
I think the pictures belie the size.
Care to post a pic with something of known size as reference? Car or person?
Thanks!
B2N2 is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2023, 18:12
  #15 (permalink)  
Spoon PPRuNerist & Mad Inistrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Twickenham, home of rugby
Posts: 7,390
Received 246 Likes on 164 Posts
Roughly 9 feet long and 6 foot wingspan! Heck of a model!
Saab Dastard is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2023, 18:19
  #16 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,418
Received 1,593 Likes on 730 Posts
And that’s number 3…..

The first 2 models were lost in early flight test, but as the saying goes, 3rd time's a charm and so far it has 45 flights on it.
​​​​​​​
ORAC is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 11th Sep 2023, 18:29
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 633
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Well now you spoiled it by showing pictures of the real one. Now I have to squint to not see that the main gear extension is different.

EXDAC is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2023, 19:06
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,810
Received 136 Likes on 64 Posts
My only (and abiding) memory of the Bucc was when faced by one doing an Exercise airfield attack at Waddo … pointing straight at ATC Local. Those intakes just got bigger and bigger! Did I duck? Not sure!
MPN11 is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2023, 19:38
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: scotland
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Off topic but my recollection of the Bucaneer was an encounter near Garstang when doing the gas pipeline survey. I looked left up to the hills in the direction of the Spadeadam training area and all I saw were two great intakes and a nosecone, all too close and at my level. We passed safely.
dickmct is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2023, 22:07
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,285
Received 132 Likes on 86 Posts
Superb model, I would also like to see a video. Early memory of Buccs for me was wheels appearing out of a layer of thick black cloud over the Anglesey Golf Clubhouse which were finally revealed to belong to the first of three visitors from Laarbruch somewhere in the short distance to the Valley boundary fence.

Originally Posted by deltahotel
Looks great, well done. Now you just need to rid of the silly fox decal and replace with some blue/yellow arrow thingy near the nose!
I fear you are wrong, it needs repainting in the immortal colour scheme as shown in Nutty's top image. Or of course '547s current 'desert pink' scheme at Hendon.
SLXOwft is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.