UK Security Vetting Failure
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
UK Security Vetting Failure
A truly damning and terrifying report into the complete failure of the UK Security Vetting system has been issued.
Understaffed, under resourced and close to complete failure - this is a deeply worrying read on many levels.
https://committees.parliament.uk/com...urity-vetting/
Understaffed, under resourced and close to complete failure - this is a deeply worrying read on many levels.
https://committees.parliament.uk/com...urity-vetting/
Surely not related to the 4 Prime ministers , 6 chancellors of the Exchequer, god knows how many Defence Ministers etc we've had since 2019?
The following users liked this post:
The following 3 users liked this post by hoodie:
When everything is changing - budgets, people, political aims. it just stops everyone (especially a Civil Servant) in their tracks - who do you report to? Where is the guidance?? where is the budget?? who is in charge (no-one it seems!) , who takes the rap??
Most people doing the actual vetting are admin clerks. They will still report to the same people and still follow the same process regardless of who is PM, Defence Sec or Chancellor. Yes they are understaffed, but changing PMs etc hasn't changed anything that counts for day to day vetting of people.
This is interesting. You'd think that a PermSec on £200k pa (more than the PM IIRC) and a couple of SCS3 on £150k pa (~10% less than the PM) might be able to sort that out?
Still - Brexit, Tories, Grrrr eh?
No - simply Corporate inertia - seen it in several companies when a takeover was announced - no-one does anything
Its not good, but it does happen.
Its not good, but it does happen.
The thrus seems to be that targets have been missed in terms of how long it takes to get a vetting completed. What it doesn't seem to consider is whether there are more people needing a clearance for instance. Failure to me would be that people who shouldn't get a clearance have been granted said clearance in order to meet a performance target.
Most people doing the actual vetting are admin clerks. They will still report to the same people and still follow the same process regardless of who is PM, Defence Sec or Chancellor. Yes they are understaffed, but changing PMs etc hasn't changed anything that counts for day to day vetting of people.
At the other end of the process, whenever one of my people was up for vetting, again the questions asked of me were searching.
Have things gone down the pan, and, if so, why?
Is this true? All of my PV and enhanced and various other bells and whistles appeared to be carried out by ex-officers or ex-police officers and seemed to me to be very thorough.
At the other end of the process, whenever one of my people was up for vetting, again the questions asked of me were searching.
Have things gone down the pan, and, if so, why?
At the other end of the process, whenever one of my people was up for vetting, again the questions asked of me were searching.
Have things gone down the pan, and, if so, why?
DV is just as thorough as always.
There is a figure quoted (I shall have to try and dig it up) that shows the number of people applying for clearances far exceeds the forecast. This is added to by failed IT projects and lack of staff following the transition from MOD to Cabinet Office.
There is work ongoing with industry to allow the NSV to better forecast demand, and it seems they are almost there with sorting out the basic elements of their IT, but currently the system is in an absolutely shambolic state and has almost ground to a complete halt in the last 6 months.
There is work ongoing with industry to allow the NSV to better forecast demand, and it seems they are almost there with sorting out the basic elements of their IT, but currently the system is in an absolutely shambolic state and has almost ground to a complete halt in the last 6 months.
One question is why has the number of people who require clearance gone up suddenly?
My bet is that with the Chinese IT scare a whole herd of extra jobs have been deemed sensitive and so are requiring clearance. And of course no-one thought through the implications for vetting.
I've been through the process at 3 times in various jobs and, as with Downsizer, I though they were very thorough and very polite.
My bet is that with the Chinese IT scare a whole herd of extra jobs have been deemed sensitive and so are requiring clearance. And of course no-one thought through the implications for vetting.
I've been through the process at 3 times in various jobs and, as with Downsizer, I though they were very thorough and very polite.
Is this true? All of my PV and enhanced and various other bells and whistles appeared to be carried out by ex-officers or ex-police officers and seemed to me to be very thorough.
At the other end of the process, whenever one of my people was up for vetting, again the questions asked of me were searching.
Have things gone down the pan, and, if so, why?
At the other end of the process, whenever one of my people was up for vetting, again the questions asked of me were searching.
Have things gone down the pan, and, if so, why?
As for the number of clearances Asturias mentions, it's been a combination of things. There were delays due to covid which lead to extensions and higher number of people going through renewal at the same time, the consequences of which we are still feeling. There have also been a higher number of people needing their clearances increased for various reasons, adding to the overall number.
One question is why has the number of people who require clearance gone up suddenly?
My bet is that with the Chinese IT scare a whole herd of extra jobs have been deemed sensitive and so are requiring clearance. And of course no-one thought through the implications for vetting.
I've been through the process at 3 times in various jobs and, as with Downsizer, I though they were very thorough and very polite.
My bet is that with the Chinese IT scare a whole herd of extra jobs have been deemed sensitive and so are requiring clearance. And of course no-one thought through the implications for vetting.
I've been through the process at 3 times in various jobs and, as with Downsizer, I though they were very thorough and very polite.
A friend in a fairly sensitive post reckons he's almost unsackable as it took them 6 months to clear him and they're now far, far longer to add bodies in his area.
The following users liked this post:
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: On my favourite chair
Age: 55
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
I left the RAF last year and for the last 20 years of my time I was DV cleared. I obtained a job with a civilian company which had contracts with various Government agencies for which I needed my DV to be resurrected as well as some other checks which one of the agencies required. After 6 months of waiting for the clearances to come through I had to get a job elsewhere due to financial pressures, so my original job had to be knocked on the head. Had the clearances come through in a reasonable time then I wouldn't be in my current job. I have a lot of sympathy with the original civilian company as they couldn't get me started until the clearances and other checks came through, so they are back at stage one and have to recruit somebody else and again wait for the clearance process to give them the green light
The following users liked this post:
I left the RAF last year and for the last 20 years of my time I was DV cleared. I obtained a job with a civilian company which had contracts with various Government agencies for which I needed my DV to be resurrected as well as some other checks which one of the agencies required. After 6 months of waiting for the clearances to come through I had to get a job elsewhere due to financial pressures, so my original job had to be knocked on the head. Had the clearances come through in a reasonable time then I wouldn't be in my current job. I have a lot of sympathy with the original civilian company as they couldn't get me started until the clearances and other checks came through, so they are back at stage one and have to recruit somebody else and again wait for the clearance process to give them the green light
The system is BLXd anyway: I was once asked to subscribe to the vetting of one of mine who, I reported, was devious, untrustworthy, selfish, indulged in prostitutes and exchanged hard core. Yet he/she/it got the job. I half expected to be vetted again as it was clear that I had suddenly become a liar.