Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Surplus USMC AV-8B - Article Suggesting Taiwan May Acquire

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Surplus USMC AV-8B - Article Suggesting Taiwan May Acquire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Oct 2022, 23:20
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 149
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by BEagle
As yet has there been any occasion when the vertical capabilities of the F-35B have shown a clear advantage over conventional aircraft?

SHAR 2 with 4 x AMRAAM and Link 16 was a pretty capable carrier borne aircraft. But GR9 without any radar and only eyeball missiles...??
The US (and all other) models actually had a radar left in. Sure they could be wired for meteor let alone latest AMRAAM+
MJ89 is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2022, 07:14
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Overseas
Posts: 446
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by MJ89
The US (and all other) models actually had a radar left in. Sure they could be wired for meteor let alone latest AMRAAM+
It's still a subsonic launch platform with no real survivability against a peer state adversary. Yes, you could make it worth with huge cash investment, or you could continue investing in current capabilities.
LateArmLive is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2022, 13:21
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Here and there
Age: 41
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by LateArmLive
It's still a subsonic launch platform with no real survivability against a peer state adversary. Yes, you could make it worth with huge cash investment, or you could continue investing in current capabilities.
Couldn’t agree more - yes you could ‘bolt it on’ relatively easily, but proper integration takes a lot of time and a huge amount of cash; at the end you’d still only be left with a BVR-equipped Harrier. Better to spend the money on more F35s.
frodo_monkey is online now  
Old 11th Oct 2022, 13:56
  #24 (permalink)  
fdr
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 3rd Rock, #29B
Posts: 2,956
Received 861 Likes on 257 Posts
Originally Posted by LateArmLive
It's still a subsonic launch platform with no real survivability against a peer state adversary. Yes, you could make it worth with huge cash investment, or you could continue investing in current capabilities.
Originally Posted by frodo_monkey
Couldn’t agree more - yes you could ‘bolt it on’ relatively easily, but proper integration takes a lot of time and a huge amount of cash; at the end you’d still only be left with a BVR-equipped Harrier. Better to spend the money on more F35s.
The air threat from offshore has a wee problem with a substantial population with an independent streak, good education, lots of CMS, and a bevy of MANPADS. Air assets are going to be going fishin'... brand X has a big swim to make. CAS at the beachheads will be a high risk but high reward caution to the other side, but the boat people will be also busy with ducking portable missiles and ATWs. Presumably the guys that make most of our electronics have been watching YouTube and might have some novel ideas thanks to the lessons gifted by Vlad's vacation in Eastern Europe. High value assets like battleships make great targets, as do airports etc. to have any air assets, VSTOL seems to add some options and frustrations for a relatively low overhead. Being parsimonious, the AV8 is a fair price point for a cat C stores item. Much prefer brand X working on their economy and on biohazard prevention; F-35s didn't do much against CoViD.
fdr is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2022, 19:53
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Midlands
Posts: 745
Received 25 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by frodo_monkey;[url=tel:11311640
11311640[/url]]Couldn’t agree more - yes you could ‘bolt it on’ relatively easily, but proper integration takes a lot of time and a huge amount of cash; at the end you’d still only be left with a BVR-equipped Harrier. Better to spend the money on more F35s.
The AV8B+ is already a AMRAAM equipped BVR- Harrier. It’s no F35 but it would be a cheap readily available force multiplier whilst more F35s/F16s are produced to meet demand.
Stitchbitch is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2022, 21:55
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Overseas
Posts: 446
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Stitchbitch
The AV8B+ is already a AMRAAM equipped BVR- Harrier. It’s no F35 but it would be a cheap readily available force multiplier whilst more F35s/F16s are produced to meet demand.
Nobody is disputing that. The article mentions upgrading the old USMC jets with AESA and modern weapons. It would be a huge expense for a modest increase in capability. This is for a China vs Taiwan scenario - 50 Harriers won't make a difference (and that's once you've thrown good money at buying, upgrading and training your Air Force to operate a capability that's brand new to them). It's a complete red herring IMO.
LateArmLive is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2022, 05:13
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,077
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by LateArmLive
Nobody is disputing that. The article mentions upgrading the old USMC jets with AESA and modern weapons. It would be a huge expense for a modest increase in capability. This is for a China vs Taiwan scenario - 50 Harriers won't make a difference (and that's once you've thrown good money at buying, upgrading and training your Air Force to operate a capability that's brand new to them). It's a complete red herring IMO.

If China prosecutes the first few hours of a conflict in a way that resembles the way the west would, Taiwan won’t have the runways to operate from. That’s where the value of the Harriers comes into play.
West Coast is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2022, 07:56
  #28 (permalink)  
fdr
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 3rd Rock, #29B
Posts: 2,956
Received 861 Likes on 257 Posts
Originally Posted by West Coast
If China prosecutes the first few hours of a conflict in a way that resembles the way the west would, Taiwan won’t have the runways to operate from. That’s where the value of the Harriers comes into play.
where is that like button?



It doesn't seem to matter that the AV8 may not be effective against PRC CAP, they will have their hands full dodging MANPADS and similar. What is valuable is the opportunity to go and do some CAS from FOBs that are essentially unprepared. The distribution of the air assets allows them to last long enough to be an impediment to the beach heads. There is possibly more value in buying gallons of DJI drones, or amping up drone production in Taiwan, Alibaba's orderbooks are probably going to be full or limited to rogue regions, and more MANPADS than PRC has air assets.
fdr is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2022, 11:19
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 514 Likes on 215 Posts
How many F-35's will the RAF/RN have with full complement?

Far more capable than the Harrier....but then don't sheer numbers matter when it comes to all out War?
SASless is online now  
Old 14th Oct 2022, 00:17
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 149
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
How many F-35's will the RAF/RN have with full complement?

Far more capable than the Harrier....but then don't sheer numbers matter when it comes to all out War?
Plus you can buy 12 harriers+ for 1 f35. and afford combat losses. as long as the pilot can punch out, and fight another day. There's more harriers to take their place. (the RAFs loss is there gain)
MJ89 is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2022, 00:36
  #31 (permalink)  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: The Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,710
Received 287 Likes on 130 Posts
Originally Posted by MJ89
Plus you can buy 12 harriers+ for 1 f35. and afford combat losses. as long as the pilot can punch out, and fight another day. There's more harriers to take their place. (the RAFs loss is there gain)
But, can you afford to find and train 11 extra pilots?
T28B is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2022, 00:45
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 149
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by T28B
But, can you afford to find and train 11 extra pilots?
https://www.defensenews.com/congress...tary-aid-bill/

sure something could be arranged.
MJ89 is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2022, 00:49
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,077
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by fdr
where is that like button?



It doesn't seem to matter that the AV8 may not be effective against PRC CAP, they will have their hands full dodging MANPADS and similar. What is valuable is the opportunity to go and do some CAS from FOBs that are essentially unprepared. The distribution of the air assets allows them to last long enough to be an impediment to the beach heads. There is possibly more value in buying gallons of DJI drones, or amping up drone production in Taiwan, Alibaba's orderbooks are probably going to be full or limited to rogue regions, and more MANPADS than PRC has air assets.
I agree. Look at the way the US Marines employ the Harrier, almost exclusively as a CAS asset.
West Coast is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2022, 01:07
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 149
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
CAS shoot and scoot tactics would be basically the maverick and rockets in a real war, maverick 2 max 4 load out. we could offer brimstone integration and make it into a 600kt Apache.

just think..

Quantity does have a quality of its own.
MJ89 is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2022, 06:51
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: York
Posts: 627
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by MJ89
CAS shoot and scoot tactics would be basically the maverick and rockets in a real war, maverick 2 max 4 load out. we could offer brimstone integration and make it into a 600kt Apache.

just think..

Quantity does have a quality of its own.
not much quantity or quality within those gun pods!
dctyke is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2022, 09:42
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: UK
Posts: 100
Received 48 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by MJ89
CAS shoot and scoot tactics would be basically the maverick and rockets in a real war, maverick 2 max 4 load out. we could offer brimstone integration and make it into a 600kt Apache.

just think..

Quantity does have a quality of its own.
Taiwan is also mostly mountains, the furthest distance from the coastline to the mountains is about 30km. Plenty of scope for hiding from radar until you are close to a firing position, landing craft wouldn't fare well against Brimstone II if they were ever integrated.
Ohrly is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2022, 11:16
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Overseas
Posts: 446
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by fdr
where is that like button?



It doesn't seem to matter that the AV8 may not be effective against PRC CAP, they will have their hands full dodging MANPADS and similar. What is valuable is the opportunity to go and do some CAS from FOBs that are essentially unprepared. The distribution of the air assets allows them to last long enough to be an impediment to the beach heads. There is possibly more value in buying gallons of DJI drones, or amping up drone production in Taiwan, Alibaba's orderbooks are probably going to be full or limited to rogue regions, and more MANPADS than PRC has air assets.
Much as I enjoy nostalgia, if anyone thinks 50, or even 100 Harriers will make a difference to Taiwan in the event of a conflict with China... I suggest you haven't been paying attention.
LateArmLive is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2022, 13:03
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 149
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by LateArmLive
Much as I enjoy nostalgia, if anyone thinks 50, or even 100 Harriers will make a difference to Taiwan in the event of a conflict with China... I suggest you haven't been paying attention.
I duno i saw all the airfields hit and attempt to destroy all the planes.
and the handful of western picked aircraft have kept them in the fight re CAS, su25- hinds.etc
sure NLAWs and Javs were a bigger part.
MJ89 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.