Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Royal Flight to Edinburgh

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Royal Flight to Edinburgh

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Sep 2022, 12:57
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Royal Flight to Edinburgh

Does anyone know why the King flew from Northolt to Edinburgh earlier today in the privately chartered Embraer, rather than the RAF Falcon parked behind?
Was the RAF all at lunch?
I ask the question as one who had the honour and privilege of having held a commission from HM Queen Elizabeth II; May she rest in peace.
Biggles64 is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2022, 16:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by Biggles64
Does anyone know why the King flew from Northolt to Edinburgh earlier today in the privately chartered Embraer, rather than the RAF Falcon parked behind?
Was the RAF all at lunch?
I ask the question as one who had the honour and privilege of having held a commission from HM Queen Elizabeth II; May she rest in peace.
Watch the replay on iPlayer, and count how many people got on and off the Embraer ...
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2022, 16:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: York
Posts: 517
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Watch the replay on iPlayer, and count how many people got on and off the Embraer ...
So, is the better question why doesn't the RAF have aircraft that can meet the tasking?
muppetofthenorth is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2022, 17:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by muppetofthenorth
So, is the better question why doesn't the RAF have aircraft that can meet the tasking?
I couldn't possibly comment on whether that's a better question.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2022, 17:20
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,056
Received 2,931 Likes on 1,250 Posts
Originally Posted by muppetofthenorth
So, is the better question why doesn't the RAF have aircraft that can meet the tasking?

Well let’s face it, a Falcon 900 is no replacement for a BAe 146 no matter how many ways you cut it, with the new P-8 Poseidon, a couple of 737-800ERX. would have probably been a better fit with more space and commonality with the fleet, ideal for plodding around Europe with an extended range for the odd long range trips.
Second best is chartering as and when as is the present case, though it’s tragic that this Country has come to that.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2022, 18:08
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 11,837
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Shame BA did not still have the A318, or equivalent then they could all have flown in luxury from London City if Northolt runway would have a length limit.
Kiltrash is online now  
Old 12th Sep 2022, 18:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,287
Received 718 Likes on 252 Posts
I would be a lot happier if HM the King always flew in RAF aircraft, maintained by RAF on an RAF station.
langleybaston is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2022, 19:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Up Narf
Posts: 437
Received 137 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by langleybaston
I would be a lot happier if HM the King always flew in RAF aircraft, maintained by RAF on an RAF station.
Seen the new Prince of Wales fly on aircraft serviced by myself a couple of hours before. Wished I had known beforehand, the aircraft would have got an emergency wash. Alas, there is things like defence cuts and paying mates for supplying leased aeroplanes.
Diff Tail Shim is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2022, 04:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,820
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Well let’s face it, a Falcon 900 is no replacement for a BAe 146 no matter how many ways you cut it, with the new P-8 Poseidon, a couple of 737-800ERX. would have probably been a better fit with more space and commonality with the fleet, ideal for plodding around Europe with an extended range for the odd long range trips.
Second best is chartering as and when as is the present case, though it’s tragic that this Country has come to that.
Northolt hasn't got a long enough runway for 737 types.

Last edited by chevvron; 13th Sep 2022 at 08:37.
chevvron is online now  
Old 13th Sep 2022, 06:51
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: EGLL
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by chevvron
Northolt hasn't got a long enough rinway for 737 types.
USAF C-40's (737's) have been occasional visitors to Northolt.
Maybe with limitations,but...

During one Families Day I attended a few years back, a C-40 with Gen. Petraeus aboard interrupted (or added to) the day's event with its sporty departure.
G-ARZG is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2022, 08:36
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Luton
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Watch the replay on iPlayer, and count how many people got on and off the Embraer ...

that Legacy has 13 seats, the Falcon config isnt publicly available but a standard fit is 12-15 pax, so both have both got a similar seating config and capacity. So thats not the reason.

G-AZUK is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2022, 08:41
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,926
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by langleybaston
I would be a lot happier if HM the King always flew in RAF aircraft, maintained by RAF on an RAF station.

Why?

He is not exclusive to the military, let alone any one service.
pr00ne is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2022, 08:45
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,926
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by G-AZUK
that Legacy has 13 seats, the Falcon config isnt publicly available but a standard fit is 12-15 pax, so both have both got a similar seating config and capacity. So thats not the reason.

More likely to be the fact that the RAF only has two of them, that they are being flown by mixed civilian and military crews whilst they remain on the civil register ahead of military conversion in 2024. Doubt if they have many service crews qualified yet.

Also, there are an unprecedented amount of VIP related movements at the moment, so a mere two aircraft were never going to be anywhere near able to cope.
pr00ne is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2022, 09:23
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,056
Received 2,931 Likes on 1,250 Posts
I did wonder if they could have roped in the Phenoms, but I have no idea as to the cabin fit.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2022, 10:36
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,926
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
I did wonder if they could have roped in the Phenoms, but I have no idea as to the cabin fit.
Owned by the MTFS contractor not the MOD. Doubt that the contract provides for transport use, and there are only 5 of them. Can you imagine the media outcry if it transpires that the RAF diverted aircraft from training use to support an inadequate front line? It would merely add to CAS current woes...
pr00ne is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2022, 10:38
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 75' from the runway edge and 150' from the threshold
Age: 74
Posts: 247
Received 30 Likes on 12 Posts
Apt registration

THE Edinburgh Telly-Heli. G-INTV
ACW342 is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2022, 14:36
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,287
Received 718 Likes on 252 Posts
Originally Posted by pr00ne
Why?

He is not exclusive to the military, let alone any one service.
Safety.
langleybaston is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2022, 15:08
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: At altitude surviving on bleed air.
Posts: 911
Received 31 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by langleybaston
Safety.
Standards or security?
Confusious is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2022, 15:39
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,926
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by langleybaston
Safety.
Really? Are you seriously saying that the RAF is safer than civilian airlines?

You are aware that it is civilian companies that design and build the RAF’s aircraft?

pr00ne is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2022, 15:40
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,133
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by pr00ne View Post
Why?.

He is not exclusive to the military, let alone any one service.

Safety.
Just so long as you don't let him near the controls.
melmothtw is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.