Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Crash Cat. Puma/Chinook

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Crash Cat. Puma/Chinook

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 07:55
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crash Cat. Puma/Chinook

A couple of questions

My civvy airfield is regularly used by Pumas and Chinooks for refuelling. We are published as Civil Fire Cat. 2 with up to Cat. 4 available on request. Although military aircraft are outside the scope of civillian airfield licensing/fire cat. criteria,

a) Do you have a laid down minimum level of protection at civvy airfields?
b) Is it a Captains decision to accept a lower Category?
matspart3 is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 08:48
  #2 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,619
Received 489 Likes on 261 Posts
I think you've answered your own question.

Same as when landing in a field.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 13:43
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So you'd be happy with Cat 1 then? (ie two firemen and 1 tender)It would certainly save us the hassle of bringing in extra firemen.
matspart3 is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 13:46
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Escaped from ABZ...
Posts: 312
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Any fire cover is a bonus, as most fields don't come fitted with fire tenders and crew!

Amusing that we can land in a field, but can't land after hours at S***bury 'cos there is no fire cover..... oh the flexibility of Parent and Teacher Command.....
detgnome is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 14:40
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
detgnome...I think you may be touching on the issue here. I accept that any cover is better than none, but if PTC won't let you land without fire cover at a military airfield, are there any limitations at civvy fields too?

We've done a risk assesment and are happy that our Civil Cat. would suffice in the event of a 'nasty', but I wanted to check before I document it in the Aerodrome Manual. We've had all sorts of fun and games with your fixed wing colleagues at Cranwell recently, who now require 7 firemen and 2 tenders with about a squillion gallons of FFP before they'll bring a Jetstream in. Ironically, if the same aircraft was civillian, civil Cat 3 (1 tender, 4 men) would suffice.
matspart3 is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 17:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: preston
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
crash cats

if i remember rightly its up to the captain whether hes happy with the crash cover. on the subject of the jetstream i can remember them using barkston with only raf cat 1 cover which was one range rover and 3 blokes, i wonder if cranwell are getting themselves confused with the differences between military and civvy cats?
canberra is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2002, 08:28
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Matspart - if you are going into print I suggest you need the info from an accredited source. I would call Odiham and Benson and talk to the standards flight (or CFS agent, whatever he is called) - he should be able to tell you exactly what the rules are.

Also, AIDU will sell you a variety of publications which contain loads of info - the En-Route Supplement British Isles and North Atlantic (BINA) is one which you might find useful. Have a look at the AIDU website:

http://www.aidu.co.uk
FJJP is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2002, 12:13
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Craggy Island
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don,t slag off my beautiful Shawbs, you are out of date, PTC stations CAN be used out of hours nowadays
DrinkGirls is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2002, 13:26
  #9 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,703
Received 58 Likes on 28 Posts
Hush hush DrinkGirls ...... EGOS should remain a well kept secret ...... if foul and false rumours keep interlopers away - so be it. They probably wouldn't appreciate the rural charms of Salopia anyway.
teeteringhead is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.