Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Air Force fighter pilots face an increased risk of testicular and prostate cancers

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Air Force fighter pilots face an increased risk of testicular and prostate cancers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Oct 2021, 22:07
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,382
Received 213 Likes on 97 Posts
So, the obvious solution to the problem is to use female fighter pilots?
Ascend Charlie is online now  
Old 27th Oct 2021, 02:22
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 276
Received 218 Likes on 113 Posts
Originally Posted by Ascend Charlie
So, the obvious solution to the problem is to use female fighter pilots?
But will the female fighter pilots be strong enough to wear the big watches?
artee is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2021, 08:22
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,075
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Unfortunately this result is no surprise if your sit next to some very strong microwave emitters for a living.
In Germany we had some similar debate with military ground radar observers that ended up with specific lower body cancers sitting next to radar displays with strong radiation.
Less Hair is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2021, 21:38
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,285
Received 712 Likes on 250 Posts
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
I wonder...
Is the incidence of testicular cancer somehow related to the self-percieved size of the testicles?
And prostrate troubles due perhaps (!) to the excess flatulence their career path seems to produce?
PROSTATE

just saying
langleybaston is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2021, 18:14
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,418
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Given that well over 50% of all men will have some form of prostate cancer during their lifetimes, if this study is correct the odds for fighter pilots must be crazy high.
tdracer is online now  
Old 28th Oct 2021, 19:59
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: florida
Age: 81
Posts: 1,610
Received 55 Likes on 16 Posts
Salute!

Given that 99.9% of all males that have eaten brocolli have died, I would take my chances flying the Hun and avoid that green veggie.

From personal experience, I can guarantee that the last thing I was worried about when gettin shot at on a regular basis was having prostsate cancer or lung cancer. I still managed to ruin my lungs from smoking, and likely inhaling toxic fumes on the flight line, but not cancer...just loss of function.

As with the gorebull warming studies, last line is always we need $$ for another study. Hmmmmm....

Gums sends...

gums is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2021, 00:59
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Australia
Age: 55
Posts: 199
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by NutLoose

You don't thing its anything to do with the amount of radium used on the dials of your big firke orf watches?
Given ShyTorque's earlier suggestion I guess that means Fighter jocks are left handed?
Mk 1 is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2021, 06:53
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: S W France
Age: 80
Posts: 261
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Most have told me that they need both hands!
Tengah Type is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2021, 17:15
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BOQ
Age: 79
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If I'd known about this beforehand, I certainly would have avoided flying fighters and gone into something safer like accounting or lapidary.

Having a number of hours in three of the machines in the study, I guess I'm as good as dead.....

.....although at my age I'm not planning anything particularly long term anyway.

You know, except for a very small range-only radar for gun lead computations, the F-100 didn't even have a real 'radar'. Unlike the F-105 or F-4 which did.

The radar layout in the 727 had the real potential to 'fry' something fleshy. It had a radar dish right in front of the pilots that continuously rotated 360 degrees, with a cutout switch to terminate the radiation while pointed at the cockpit and another switch to restart it again when pointed down range.....

There was no indication to the pilots that the cutout was operating properly.
OK465 is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2021, 18:21
  #30 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,020
Received 2,900 Likes on 1,242 Posts
If I remember correctly didn’t Concorde carry some equipment to monitor radiation at altitude and when it was retired I seem to remember something about it going into JCB’s Gulfstream.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2021, 18:30
  #31 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,020
Received 2,900 Likes on 1,242 Posts
Originally Posted by Mk 1
Given ShyTorque's earlier suggestion I guess that means Fighter jocks are left handed?

Off topic but watched the Red Bull through the tunnel film and he was wearing a Hamilton watch that detaches then clips to the panel, clever item.


https://www.ablogtowatch.com/hamilto...edition-watch/

See 10 seconds in


NutLoose is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.