Military Aviation, War and the Internet
Thread Starter
Military Aviation, War and the Internet
In terms of secrecy and War the Internet is a bad thing. The enemy could, just by monitoring plane spotting sites, plot the course of inbound hostile aircraft.
You can't just turn the Internet off as it was designed to survive attempts at turning it off or destroying it.
So is there a military, government contingency in the event of War that deals with this problem?
You can't just turn the Internet off as it was designed to survive attempts at turning it off or destroying it.
So is there a military, government contingency in the event of War that deals with this problem?
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,814
Received 141 Likes
on
65 Posts
Instant reaction to that is Bottle/Genii/Cork … but FR24 etc. would hopefully be shut down by Government diktat at the first opportunity. And shoot spotters!
When we at Waddington launched n Vulcans to Ascension in total r/t silence, with a Sov AGI perched off-shore, there were additional Sy procedures in place … I will not elaborate further., but my Aldis lamp justified it’s existence that day.
As to the nub of your question, COMSEC is the only possible option, aka STFU!
When we at Waddington launched n Vulcans to Ascension in total r/t silence, with a Sov AGI perched off-shore, there were additional Sy procedures in place … I will not elaborate further., but my Aldis lamp justified it’s existence that day.
As to the nub of your question, COMSEC is the only possible option, aka STFU!
MPN11, if you think the bad guys don’t monitor likely airfields for silent launches, I’m afraid you’re in cloud cuckoo land, an example:-
Years ago, I was guesting with the Norwegians around Kirkenes, close to the Russian border, the Soviets put out a ship from Murmansk which the Noggies were interested in. They decided to launch the sneaky beaky P3 which always operated in silence. Even as it was taxying, we heard the Russians tell the ship the P3 was launching, time to come home.
Years ago, I was guesting with the Norwegians around Kirkenes, close to the Russian border, the Soviets put out a ship from Murmansk which the Noggies were interested in. They decided to launch the sneaky beaky P3 which always operated in silence. Even as it was taxying, we heard the Russians tell the ship the P3 was launching, time to come home.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,814
Received 141 Likes
on
65 Posts
Fair point, although of course EGXW was nowhere near the Russian border! 😀
I have no doubt there are dedicated ‘lurkers’ near our few remaining MOBs, making life easier for the opposition.
I have no doubt there are dedicated ‘lurkers’ near our few remaining MOBs, making life easier for the opposition.
In terms of secrecy and War the Internet is a bad thing. The enemy could, just by monitoring plane spotting sites, plot the course of inbound hostile aircraft.
You can't just turn the Internet off as it was designed to survive attempts at turning it off or destroying it.
So is there a military, government contingency in the event of War that deals with this problem?
You can't just turn the Internet off as it was designed to survive attempts at turning it off or destroying it.
So is there a military, government contingency in the event of War that deals with this problem?
No military aircraft I have ever flown has appeared on FlightRadar or equivalent. Heavies generally do whilst operating "routinely" with ADS-B or equivalent.
What others have said about HUMINT is exactly right though.
What others have said about HUMINT is exactly right though.
Last edited by Easy Street; 22nd Aug 2021 at 23:49.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,073
Received 2,942 Likes
on
1,253 Posts
Not to forget the blogger over the road from Osama's residence on line and detailing the events of the raid as it unfolded.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...n-live-blogger
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...n-live-blogger
Thread Starter
You can't turn off the Mk1 eye ball.
I remember spotters tracking real time B52's as they flew from the UK to Iraq and Afghanistan. Okay, the Iraqies and Afghans are not likely to have the capability to do anything about that other than get out of dodge.
If you take the situation the Talliban are in at the moment. Having been handed an entire military solution to play with (reports of 45 Blackhawks, 2000 military vehicles, weapons etc) the Internet intel could be very useful.
I remember spotters tracking real time B52's as they flew from the UK to Iraq and Afghanistan. Okay, the Iraqies and Afghans are not likely to have the capability to do anything about that other than get out of dodge.
If you take the situation the Talliban are in at the moment. Having been handed an entire military solution to play with (reports of 45 Blackhawks, 2000 military vehicles, weapons etc) the Internet intel could be very useful.
Thread Starter
Not to forget the blogger over the road from Osama's residence on line and detailing the events of the raid as it unfolded.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...n-live-blogger
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...n-live-blogger
We already see anti-vaxers, flat earthers, 9-11 deniers getting creedence due to the internet.
Anything squawking Mode S is being tracked by the avgeek network though multilateration (MLAT), it's just that the big commercial sites like FR24 filter out military MLAT-only tracks. If you go to the enthusiast-run ADSB Exchange you'll see Typhoons, F35s and F15s doing their thing, at least until they get far enough from civilisation that they can no longer be triangulated. Squawking 3/C only is a workaround, at potential detriment to ATC/C2 and to TCAS performance on any aircraft which may come into conflict.
From a recent article by The Economist (Print Edition of 7th August 2021, subscription required)
https://www.economist.com/leaders/20...e-intelligence
and free podcast (below)
https://www.economist.com/podcasts/2...ing-statecraft
JAS
https://www.economist.com/leaders/20...e-intelligence
and free podcast (below)
AMATEURS, ACTIVISTS and academics are using technology and open-source data to uncover state secrets. Shashank Joshi, The Economist’s defence editor, explores how open-source intelligence is disrupting statecraft and asks John Brennan, a former director of the CIA, how these techniques are being used alongside secret intelligence to detect missile silos in China.
JAS
Open Source Intelligence
Really nothing new, a good primer on the subject is:
Spying on the Bomb by Jeffrey T. Michelson
You can than start to bring yourself up to date with:
Before visiting the Bellingcat website http://www.bellingcat.co.uk
Spying on the Bomb by Jeffrey T. Michelson
You can than start to bring yourself up to date with:
Before visiting the Bellingcat website http://www.bellingcat.co.uk
This was a major headache for the MoD during the Libyan campaign in 2011, when Tornado departures from Marham were being broadcast in real-time over Twitter and spotting sites. Wouldn't take a genius to work out when those same aircraft would be over their targets. Remember the MoD at the time 'requesting' that such movements not be broadcast live, and as far as I recall the request being largely respected.
