Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Target Designation In The Falklands

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Target Designation In The Falklands

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Aug 2021, 07:32
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,206
Received 118 Likes on 54 Posts
Surely the real issue here is the guy at Cranwell must be walting right....? Designating targets in the FIs and now working as groundcrew...? C'mon, I don't buy it.
downsizer is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2021, 07:57
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 780
Received 599 Likes on 213 Posts
Originally Posted by Bagheera S
I appreciate your reply, but the question was intended for a response from a person who was close to the actual operation in 82.
In the middle of a war you're going to hover at 5000' in clear view of the enemy? You don't need specialist knowledge to predict the likely consequences. If I were a member of your crew and you proposed such a plan I'd have clubbed you like a baby seal.
Video Mixdown is online now  
Old 9th Aug 2021, 08:12
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: South
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Video Mixdown
In the middle of a war you're going to hover at 5000' in clear view of the enemy? You don't need specialist knowledge to predict the likely consequences. If I were a member of your crew and you proposed such a plan I'd have clubbed you like a baby seal.
Tis ashame you didn’t read the post, I said “outside the defended area” ie outside the Roland missile engagement zone…. They only go so far;- approx 5miles horizontally.

Looking the film and maps they were successfully designating targets (artillery)at 10 -12 miles from an elevation of about 1000ft.



Last edited by Bagheera S; 9th Aug 2021 at 12:00.
Bagheera S is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2021, 09:13
  #44 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,509
Received 1,650 Likes on 754 Posts
You’d have to have supreme confidence in the intelligence on enemy ground weapon deployment in an era and area without satellite coverage or photo recce and analysis….
ORAC is online now  
Old 9th Aug 2021, 09:51
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,709
Received 38 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by Yellow Sun
A little known event occurred one weekend when a Nimrod was flown from Kinloss to Lossiemouth where an afternoon was spent trying LGBs for size in the bomb bay. There was no information forthcoming about how they might be used, in fact I somehow doubt that it had developed that far. However it was established that the stores could be carried so I suppose it could have become an “interesting’ option.
Presumably if they put a PaveSpike pod on the wing pylon it could self designate. From memory they also tried fittiing LGBs to the Vulcan, but were hampered by the fact that you could only fit three in the bomb bay
Davef68 is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2021, 12:22
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,196
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Davef68
Presumably if they put a PaveSpike pod on the wing pylon it could self designate. From memory they also tried fittiing LGBs to the Vulcan, but were hampered by the fact that you could only fit three in the bomb bay
I would presume nothing. No information was made available at station level regarding how LGBs might be employed. Had I to guess, the aircraft role might have been similar to the part it usually played in a Vectac.

I don’t know what the outcome of the measuring up exercise was. We knew beforehand that they would fit, but how many and if a safe release was achievable was not a unit matter. In any event, there were many other things going on that fully occupied my time.

YS
Yellow Sun is online now  
Old 9th Aug 2021, 22:50
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 610
Received 69 Likes on 29 Posts
The GBU-10s & 12s we used back in the day had a 4-digit code that was set on both the weapon and the designator. Did the kits used in the Falklands not have this, or if they did, how was it expected that the Harrier laser would work with them?
itsnotthatbloodyhard is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.