Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF C-130J's to be retired early?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF C-130J's to be retired early?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jul 2023, 08:02
  #441 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PLanet Earth
Posts: 1,329
Received 104 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by SLXOwft
The FMS declaration last September was for 24 not 20 C-130s at USD 6.35 Billion.
Ouuuu. That's >260 Mio per copy. Is there some special kit included?
henra is online now  
Old 26th Jul 2023, 08:52
  #442 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: aus
Posts: 1,314
Likes: 0
Received 107 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by henra
Ouuuu. That's >260 Mio per copy. Is there some special kit included?
No every time an australian defence procurment comes up. Thats lifetime project costs (or as my company calls it in the civilian world "whole life cost accounting"), to covers the full project so airframes + estimated spares + new facilites / possible field upgrades + maintainence contracts.

As this is a FMS sale its costs australia the exact same price as it would cost the DOD


https://www.cipfa.org/policy-and-gui...e-life-costing
rattman is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2023, 09:10
  #443 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,132
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by rattman
No every time an australian defence procurment comes up. Thats lifetime project costs (or as my company calls it in the civilian world "whole life cost accounting"), to covers the full project so airframes + estimated spares + new facilites / possible field upgrades + maintainence contracts.

As this is a FMS sale its costs australia the exact same price as it would cost the DOD


https://www.cipfa.org/policy-and-gui...e-life-costing
That's not how FMS works.
melmothtw is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2023, 12:16
  #444 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PLanet Earth
Posts: 1,329
Received 104 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by rattman
No every time an australian defence procurment comes up. Thats lifetime project costs (or as my company calls it in the civilian world "whole life cost accounting"), to covers the full project so airframes + estimated spares + new facilites / possible field upgrades + maintainence contracts.
???
Hmmm, why do you need FMS (=Foreign Military Sales) approval for revamping your airfields/hangars and for maintenance by Australian technicians?!
henra is online now  
Old 26th Jul 2023, 20:16
  #445 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: aus
Posts: 1,314
Likes: 0
Received 107 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by henra
???
Hmmm, why do you need FMS (=Foreign Military Sales) approval for revamping your airfields/hangars and for maintenance by Australian technicians?!
you need FMS for the airframes
rattman is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2023, 20:42
  #446 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,279
Received 132 Likes on 86 Posts
As I set the FMS hare running, I only think it fair to quote the details, I draw your attention to the items I have emboldened.

WASHINGTON, November 2, 2022 - The State Department has made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of Australia of C-130J-30 aircraft and related equipment for an estimated cost of $6.35 billion. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency delivered the required certification notifying Congress of this possible sale today.

The Government of Australia has requested to buy twenty-four (24) C-130J-30 aircraft with four (4) each Rolls Royce AE-2100D turboprop engines installed; twenty-four (24) Rolls Royce AE-2100D turboprop engines with Quick Engine Change Assembly (QECA) and propellers installed (spares); sixty (60) Embedded Global Positioning System/Inertial Navigation System (GPS/INS) (EGI) security devices, airborne (48 installed, 12 spares); thirty-two (32) AN/ALQ-251 Radio Frequency Countermeasure (RFCM) systems; twenty-seven (27) Guardian Laser Transmitter Assemblies (GLTA) for Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures (LAIRCM) systems (24 installed, 3 spares); sixteen (16) AN/AAQ 24(V)N LAIRCM System Processor Replacements (LSPR) (12 installed, 4 spares); and twenty-four (24) Multifunctional Information Distribution System Joint Tactical Radio System (MIDS JTRS) (installed). Also included are AN/AAQ 24(V)N LAIRCM Infrared Missile Warning Sensors (MWS), Control Interface Unit Replacements (CIRU), and classified memory card User Data Modules (UDM); KYV-5M communication security modules; AN/ARC-190 High Frequency (HF) radios; AN/ARC-210 radios; AN/ARN-153 tactical airborne navigation (TACAN) systems; AN/ARN-147 receivers; AN/ARN-149(V) automatic direction finders; AN/APX-119 Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) transponders; AN/AAR 47 missile warning systems; AN/APN-241 Low-Power Color Radars (LPCR); AN/ALE-47 Countermeasures Dispensing Systems (CMDS); AN/ALR-56 Radar Warning Receivers (RWR); AN/PYQ-10 Simple Key Loaders; MX-20HD electro optical/infrared targeting systems; AN/KIV-77 IFF cryptographic appliques; Advanced Digital Antenna Production (ADAP) system components; integration support and test equipment; aircraft and support equipment; secure communications equipment, precision navigation, and cryptographic devices; classified software delivery and support; spare and repair parts, consumables and accessories; maintenance and maintenance support; classified manuals, publications, and technical documentation; personnel training and training equipment, and U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical and logistics support services, studies and surveys; and other related elements of logistical and program support. The estimated total cost is $6.35 billion.
(...)
The principal contractor will be Lockheed Martin Corporation, Marietta, GA. There are no known offset agreements proposed in connection with this potential sale.
https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/maj...0j-30-aircraft
SLXOwft is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 27th Jul 2023, 08:22
  #447 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PLanet Earth
Posts: 1,329
Received 104 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by rattman
you need FMS for the airframes
I know. But why does the FMS request allegedly cover Airfield/Hangar refurb costs? Are the Airfields purchased in the US?
@SLXOwft: Thanks! That answers the question. In the 6.35bn there is no Refurbishment or construction of Facilities included. Also maintenance only covers specific OEM support.
But the list of equipment of the aircraft reads quite icomplete. Not just bare delivery vans.
henra is online now  
Old 27th Jul 2023, 08:45
  #448 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: aus
Posts: 1,314
Likes: 0
Received 107 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by henra
I know. But why does the FMS request allegedly cover Airfield/Hangar refurb costs? Are the Airfields purchased in the US?
@SLXOwft: Thanks! That answers the question. In the 6.35bn there is no Refurbishment or construction of Facilities included. Also maintenance only covers specific OEM support.
But the list of equipment of the aircraft reads quite icomplete. Not just bare delivery vans.
I never said it does. You are just being purposely obtuse
rattman is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2023, 07:28
  #449 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NRU74
But the J’s not as fast as the A400 according to today’s Daily Mail article ‘Death of Hercules’ which puts its speed at 889 mph!
(Yes, I know I shouldn’t read such a rag)
I'm surprised the Mail didn't just quote the speed as "Faster than the combined speed of 10 Elephants"
reader8 is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2023, 08:24
  #450 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PLanet Earth
Posts: 1,329
Received 104 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by rattman
I never said it does. You are just being purposely obtuse
???
Originally Posted by rattman
...+ new facilites / possible field upgrades + maintainence contracts.
That was part of your answer to my wondering about the 6,35bn FMS request for 24 Helicopters. You may want to read again what you wrote ;-)
henra is online now  
Old 29th Jul 2023, 11:58
  #451 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: aus
Posts: 1,314
Likes: 0
Received 107 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by henra
???

That was part of your answer to my wondering about the 6,35bn FMS request for 24 Helicopters. You may want to read again what you wrote ;-)

And where did I say FMS, dont cherry pick the quote. The FMS was a different sentence and had nothing to do with the previous sentence / paragraph.

fence procurment comes up. Thats lifetime project costs (or as my company calls it in the civilian world "whole life cost accounting"), to covers the full project so airframes + estimated spares + new facilites / possible field upgrades + maintainence contracts.
rattman is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2023, 12:21
  #452 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,819
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by reader8
I'm surprised the Mail didn't just quote the speed as "Faster than the combined speed of 10 Elephants"
We'll never know, given that the article was more than two years ago.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2023, 06:59
  #453 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,427
Received 362 Likes on 211 Posts
Didn't say if those elephants were in Wales or a Swimming pool -
Asturias56 is online now  
Old 30th Jul 2023, 07:08
  #454 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,450
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
... and no mention of the equivalent number of double decker buses (or is that an age thing?)...
Biggus is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2024, 14:20
  #455 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,279
Received 132 Likes on 86 Posts
A recent trading statement issued by Marshall Group states that the sale of the ex-RAF C-130Js is expected during H2, the delay is affecting its cash position, not only has it lost the maintenance contract it has done subsequent upgrade work on the airframes in of payment as a share of the sale value.

Cash position
The year end cash position was significantly below forecast primarily due to increased working capital requirements on various projects, including the Centre Wing project in Aerospace and inventory build-up in Land Systems following a temporary line stoppage to address an engineering issue. Underperformance in the engineering businesses also contributed to the reduction in cash.

The continued delay in resale of the UK RAF C130 Hercules aircraft contributed further to the reduction in the cash position. However, there has been serious interest from several overseas governments over the year, with a sale of the majority of the aircraft anticipated in the second half of 2024. The additional value created in these aircraft through MRO4 work, undertaken in collaboration with the UK MOD, will be released by the sale and should result in material value to the Group.

Outlook
This has been a transitional year for Marshall, and it was always anticipated that progress against the five-year strategic plan would not be linear. The Group is proactively addressing these challenges through prudent cost control, accelerated operational efficiencies and a renewed focus on leveraging the profit opportunities in our order pipeline, particularly internationally.

In the short term, it is expected that the cash and working capital trends will continue in the first half of the 2024 financial year before easing in the second half of the year, pending the anticipated sale UK RAF C130 Hercules aircraft. The order book and order pipeline remain robust, and international expansion remains on track with construction of facilities in the US and Canada to service the US and Canadian Militaries.
A document issued by Marshall of Cambridge Holdings a few days later states
Shaping the group for the future
Management has taken action to offset the end of the RAF C-130J support programme (Hercules Integrated Operational Support – ‘HIOS’) by implementing cost efficiencies, strengthening the senior leadership team, and focusing on converting the £4bn pipeline of opportunities into future revenues.
(And)
Although the last service of an RAF C-130J was completed in February, Marshall has continued to modernise aircraft within the fleet (as part of the gain share agreement with the UK MoD.)
(And)
Marshall Aerospace, the UK MoDs resale partner, is under a gain share contract and is storing the C-130J aircraft ahead of their sale. However, the timing of revenues associated with the disposal of the RAFs fleet have been pushed back, with negotiations at the ministerial level between the UK and the governments of interested parties. Any further modification work will be undertaken and paid for on completion of any deal. We understand that expressions of interest from other countries have been submitted, but timing is subject to MoD approval.
SLXOwft is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2024, 16:10
  #456 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: EGDL
Posts: 279
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
" Where is Leadership when so obviously needed"

Long gone - it's been cut on cut since 1945
From my experience the RAF hasn't had ANY decent Leadership since 1975 if you judge it by the Wratten, Scottish Group Captain, etc. etc "Leaders".
OKOC is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by OKOC:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.