Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

N Korea developing new nukes, tactical weapons and a nuke powered sub

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

N Korea developing new nukes, tactical weapons and a nuke powered sub

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jan 2021, 18:49
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Less Hair
Brings me back to the point can NK nukes be in China's interest at all? Aren't they even offensive towards their big brother?
Absolutely spot on! It seems against China's own interests.
The logical outcome of the proliferation initiated by North Korea is that everyone in the theater will need to go nuclear, including Vietnam, Thailand, Singapore, the Philippines and Indonesia, along with of course Japan and South Korea. Taiwan will be a special case, at least as it is considered a (renegade) China province, but they surely have the needed skills. So China's 9 dash map will only leave China surrounded by somewhat suspicious nuclear armed powers.
I can only assume that China believes this proliferation is going to happen in any case, so that grabbing what is possible while it is still the case is the best long term policy
etudiant is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2021, 19:00
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,080
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
It's like everybody else now gets a greenlight to "move on". And who would oppose them doing so? Finally China ends up in a region that will be nuclear armed all around. Because that one guy needed to have it first. It all happens under Beijing's watch.
Less Hair is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2021, 20:06
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,422
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
It can't get worse.
Oh yes it can.
Right now, people aren't shooting at each other - that could easily change.
I've been to Seoul a few times - nice, modern place. If the various leaders don't do a good job, it could soon look more like Berlin circa 1945...
tdracer is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2021, 20:16
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,080
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Bringing back somebody a little more educated and rational will help in any case. Foreign policy was a nightmare under the current administration.
That happens when leaders have not a tiny bit of knowledge about history or foreign policy and diplomacy. If you then don't listen to the people around you in the know your are lost.

I don't care wether the people of the US vote "left" or "right" but it needs to be some quality person. The Capitol events have proven he is not the right leader. Fighting the parliament has to be stopped.

Last edited by Less Hair; 16th Jan 2021 at 21:19.
Less Hair is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2021, 08:27
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,484
Received 365 Likes on 214 Posts
Looking back I'm not sure the colour of the Administration in Washington makes any difference to N Korea - they've been a problem for many, many years and the USA seems limited in what it can do to improve the situation
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2021, 12:58
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,080
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Sanctions seem to not be enough to prevent certain countries from arming up. Lessons should be learned. Iran will be the next candidate.
And there must be a political concept what the region around any candidate is permitted and accepted to react with.
This is not the stable and comfortable cold war one versus one scenario anymore.
Less Hair is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2021, 14:30
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Asturias56
Looking back I'm not sure the colour of the Administration in Washington makes any difference to N Korea - they've been a problem for many, many years and the USA seems limited in what it can do to improve the situation
In fairness, after the experience of the Korean war, which saw the northern cities pulverized, North Korean leaders would stop at nothing to get nuclear weapons.
The subsequent murder of Qaddafi at the hands of a NATO sponsored group when he had earlier given up nuclear ambitions ensured that North Korea would never surrender their nuclear insurance card.
China could possibly step in to halt this, but it would be hugely difficult, impossible imho without some sort of comprehensive regional agreement whose outlines even are hard to discern.
etudiant is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2021, 14:45
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,080
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
The frontline went through South Korea, the one that was attacked back then, and -with UN help- back again until it stopped on the way back when China stepped in and the US halted to bomb the key supply line bridges in the north. The north used to be the rich part and the south the poor part that on top got destroyed twice.
Less Hair is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2021, 06:59
  #29 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,457
Received 1,620 Likes on 739 Posts
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...uclear-reactor

UN atomic watchdog says North Korea appears to have restarted nuclear reactor
ORAC is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2021, 22:06
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ORAC
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...uclear-reactor

UN atomic watchdog says North Korea appears to have restarted nuclear reactor
Seems logical. The US defeat in Afghanistan damages the value of US security guarantees everywhere.
So N Korea is looking forward to a world where the US dependent states such as Japan, South Korea or Taiwan move to ensure their own security.
That puts N Korea into a more precarious position, hence the increased emphasis on their nuclear deterrent.
etudiant is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2021, 08:29
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,484
Received 365 Likes on 214 Posts
Suspect it's to be able to play a card when asking for more aid - or rather threatening folk again and then offering a concession on stopping the reactor again in exchange for food
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2021, 12:43
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 77
Posts: 1,375
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
In The Times this afternoon.

North Korea tests cruise missile that could reach Japan

North Korea has test-fired a long-range cruise missile that may be able to deliver a nuclear warhead to South Korea or Japan in the latest sign of Kim Jong-un’s determination to increase his strike capability.

According to reports and photographs on state media, two missiles travelled 930 miles and executed figure of eight manoeuvres above North Korea and its territorial waters.

Pictures in the Rodong Sinmun newspaper showed a missile exiting one of five tubes on a launch vehicle in a ball of flame, as well as a missile in horizontal flight.

Unlike nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles, North Korean cruise missile tests are not banned under United Nations sanctions. However, such a weapon would be a marked advance in the regime’s weapons technology, better able to avoid missile shields.

The test launches took place on Saturday and Sunday, according to the Korean Central News Agency. It described the missile as a “strategic weapon of great significance”, using a euphemism for nuclear-capable.


Click the link for full article & photo etc.

Lyneham Lad is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2022, 06:11
  #33 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,457
Received 1,620 Likes on 739 Posts
North Korea passed a law enshrining the right to use pre-emptive nuclear strikes to protect itself. The law also reinforces that their nuclear status is irreversible. Kim Jong Un also stated that there will be no bargaining over their nuclear weapons.

The law also specified the Mission, Constitution, Command & Control, Execution of Decision on Use, Principle of Using, Conditions of Using, Regular readiness, Safe procedures, Nonproliferation, Increase/Upgrading & Miscellaneous items in regards to their Nuclear Forces.
ORAC is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2022, 23:15
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,484
Received 365 Likes on 214 Posts
Fair enough - he's joined the club and he sounds like he'll play by the same rules as the rest of us.

Maybe we can encourage the Russians to help him put in place some decent controls over firing authority - IIRC both the Indians and Pakistanis had to be encouraged to do that
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2022, 14:10
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
Nature abhors a vacuum.....same concept works in International Affairs.

North Korea correctly views such a situation with the current US Administrations Foreign Policy and is merely taking the opportunity to advance its own interests.

We cannot fault them for that as that is how the game has and is played.

When it comes to fault finding....we should be honest and point the finger at the cause of the problem....and a better equipped and more prickly North Korea is definitely a problem.

Comparing the Trump approach to North Korea to Joe Biden's method....I think we can see a clear difference that exposes the shortcomings of the current regime.
SASless is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2022, 00:19
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,484
Received 365 Likes on 214 Posts
And Trump's approach was as success?

The basic problem is that NO US govt of whatever stripe wants a Nuclear armed N Korea - which is one reason the N Koreans have bust a gut to get the capability

I'd rather they hadn't but I don't blame them
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2022, 00:24
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,078
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
And Trump's approach was as success?

The basic problem is that NO US govt of whatever stripe wants a Nuclear armed N Korea - which is one reason the N Koreans have bust a gut to get the capability

I'd rather they hadn't but I don't blame them
It was a path that hadn’t been tried and at least for a short period kept the fat one contained. Wasn’t what you’d call a fan of Trump’s foreign policy, but attempts at the carrot over the stick were worth trying.
West Coast is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2022, 00:32
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
Fault Trump if as you wish....but Biden's approach damn sure ain't working.

We have two more years at a minimum of this gang of Loons being at bat....how much progress towards a genuine nuclear threat can North Korea achieve in that time not counting the lag in effect should a capable administration take office?

SASless is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2022, 05:20
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,080
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
How does poor NK fund all this?
Less Hair is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2022, 05:31
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,708
Received 349 Likes on 119 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
How does poor NK fund all this?
US State Dept estimates that the NK is using approx 25% of its GDP in military. NK GDP is estimated to be around USD18bn by the official data from World Bank. Thats then approx USD4.5bn annually spent on military.
peanuts, so I understand your question. However, the rumour is that they've had some help from Iran and they have unlimited free workforce, meaning a substancial increment in the budget compared to rest of the world.
Beamr is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.