Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Why do Aircraft Carriers have the Island on the right ?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Why do Aircraft Carriers have the Island on the right ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 19:17
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Asgard
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Had a catapult at RAE Bedford when I was there (1970s). Had no choice but to do it "at anchor!" F4s and Buccaneers mostly I remember.
Loki is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 19:24
  #22 (permalink)  


Sims Fly Virtually
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Used to be 3rd Sand Dune from the Left - But now I'm somewhere else somewhere else.
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
arriers Left-Handed

'Coz, in the original civilised society, we always drive to the left of the island - pity about the Froggies and the Septics,but at least their pilots got it right
ExSimGuy is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 19:29
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southampton
Posts: 859
Received 47 Likes on 22 Posts
Perhaps they should put the island in the middle - one side for taking off and the other for landing.

Just think how efficient that would be
Saintsman is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 19:29
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Kinda of on the same topic, but I've seen a line of booms extending about the deck width to the right in some pictures. What were these for?
FakePilot is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 19:31
  #25 (permalink)  
brickhistory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by ExSimGuy
'Coz, in the original civilised society, we always drive to the left of the island - pity about the Froggies and the Septics,but at least their pilots got it right
Funny, you don't sound Japanese.......
 
The following users liked this post:
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 19:34
  #26 (permalink)  
brickhistory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Saintsman
Perhaps they should put the island in the middle - one side for taking off and the other for landing.
Just think how efficient that would be
It's been done.

HMS Furious (?)
 
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 19:41
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Rural Somerset
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by airborne_artist
All carrier ops are done sailing into wind, assuming there is a surface wind. The 25 kts over the deck is pretty much a minimum req. I think you'll find for conventional launch/landing. The carrier would never be stationary, and I'd expect it to be making a minimum of 15-20 kts if launching/recovering. The sea state if the surface wind was 35 kts or more (Beaufort 8) may well preclude ops anyway.
The old man was in the penultimate HMS Ark Royal for her first commission in 1955, and I followed him into the Andrew in 1978, the year after she was paid off.
AA,

Whilst at CU in Dec 78 I witnessed HMS ARK ROYAL disembarking its Air Group, I believe it paid off after that deployment.
SJ
Strictly Jungly is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 19:53
  #28 (permalink)  
 
tony draper's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Newcastle/UK
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why does the boss driver on the bridge of those airyplane thingies sit in the left hand seat? also one believes some of the Carriers on convoy escort duties during our last bout of unpleasentess with those continentals, did not have any superstructure at all on the upper deck,
tony draper is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 19:59
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Rural Somerset
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tony draper
Why does the boss driver on the bridge of those airyplane thingies sit in the left hand seat? also one believes some of the Carriers on convoy escort duties during our last bout of unpleasentess with those continentals, did not have any superstructure at all on the upper deck,
They did have superstructure on the upper decks but they may have been open to the elements!!!!

Very early carriers were simply flat decks bolted onto the existing structure. Scary!
Strictly Jungly is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 20:03
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FakePilot
Kinda of on the same topic, but I've seen a line of booms extending about the deck width to the right in some pictures. What were these for?
Some carriers had deck-edge netting carried outwards on booms, IIRC. Others may have had radio masts etc, which would have to be folded out of the way for air ops.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 20:24
  #31 (permalink)  

Ich bin ein Prooner.
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Home of the Full Monty.
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by perusal
Do they have hands?
Yes, lots. (All hands on deck!)
Noah Zark. is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 20:29
  #32 (permalink)  


Sims Fly Virtually
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Used to be 3rd Sand Dune from the Left - But now I'm somewhere else somewhere else.
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tony draper
Why does the boss driver on the bridge of those airyplane thingies sit in the left hand seat? also one believes some of the Carriers on convoy escort duties during our last bout of unpleasentess with those continentals, did not have any superstructure at all on the upper deck,
This is actually a "hangover" from Commercial Aviation.

They had to standardise on what side of the Hairyplane the main cabin doors would be (so as not to confuse the airstairs drivers - easily done ). And the great commercial BOAC ("Better On A Camel" - or was it Imperial Airways in those "pre-PanAm" days) decided that, as charabangs always had the doors to the left, so would the new-fangled Hairyplanes

In those days, a flight from "Blighty" to Far-Flung Empire (such as the popular Chinese destination airport HFD - Hoo Flung Dung International ) took several days, and several night-stops (navigation being largely following rivers, mountain ranges, and in the case of well - colonialised areas - motorways) It was considered "Fourringer Perks" to chat up the best looking feeeemales on the flight.

This meant that the Fourringers had to sit on the left side of the Hairyplane, in order to "assess" the oncoming feeeemale pax, as they boarded, as to which were worthy of their valuable time in the bar of the night-stop hotel, to "build their strength" for the following day's 1000 km sector, following roads, rivers, and conspicuous configurations of paddy fields (the latter on routes that were later to be handed over the Air Cunnilingus and Ryan).

In those far-of times, the gallant Fourringers were the gods of the profession, much envied and their positions sought-after by the lowly Effos (as well asthe Effees, and even more lowly Navoffs and Radops, and much later the Peethrees of the Trydent) and deemed them selves worthy of all the perks they could get.

So what's changed?
ExSimGuy is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 20:37
  #33 (permalink)  

Lady Lexxington
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Manor House
Age: 43
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What I want to know is why is the Navy also called the Andrew?
lexxity is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 21:18
  #34 (permalink)  
Uneasy Pleistocene Leftover
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Gone, but not forgotten apparently?! All forums marked "Private"...
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why are aircraft carriers right handed?

Well it's obvious: they haven't figured out how to build ambidextrous ones yet...


Getting back onto a serious track here: the French have made some modifications to the carrier Charles de Gaulle, after all their problems with her propellors.



In the event of any future incapacitation of the carrier's main propulsion due to enemy attack (or even just shoddy craftsmanship), provision has been made so that a pair of Rafales can be strapped-down onto the after-part of the flight deck. This will provide the Charles de Gaulle with a "get you home" auxilary power source...
airship is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 21:24
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Planet Tharg
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasn't there an instance of a couple of F4s, Scooters and A6s used to maneouvre a carrier into it's berth using jet thrust?
Solid Rust Twotter is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 21:33
  #36 (permalink)  
Uneasy Pleistocene Leftover
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Gone, but not forgotten apparently?! All forums marked "Private"...
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It must have been a very hot day then...offshore winds?!
airship is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 22:07
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: due south
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SRT, That procedure predates the carrier jet age.

I have read of and seen a photo of a carrier being helped into berth by a line of piston engined aircraft; Skyraiders and Bearcats IIRC.
henry crun is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 22:42
  #38 (permalink)  
I'll mak siccar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Tir nan Og
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The manoeuvre was done in "The Bridges at Toko-Ri" (William Holden, Grace Kelly, et al, about 1954). The politics between the Commander of the Air Group who did not want to burn out his engines and the captain who wanted to berth his carrier formed a sub-plot in the movie.
Davaar is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 22:52
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: No. 1 Hemisphere
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

All I can say is that the aircraft involved must have had exceptionally strong undercarriage to shift so many tens of thousands of tonnes of deadweight.
What they should have done was to heave unemployed or unemployable, flipper-equipped, aircrew overboard at the back end with instructions to swim and push.
It is much cheaper and does not interfere with the ongoing operational status of the ship as long as they are instructed to talk as normal and keep up the airflow over the deck.
lanciaspezzata is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 22:57
  #40 (permalink)  
Uneasy Pleistocene Leftover
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Gone, but not forgotten apparently?! All forums marked "Private"...
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great spelling of manoeuvre there Davaar, I'd have expected nothing less from you!

If one had been born a woman, I'd have quite fancied William Holden methinks. As it was, I sometimes harboured secret thoughts of wishing he was my dad sometimes as an adolescent. As for Grace Kelly, well, I've always fancied Princess Caroline...

Anyway, I think aircraft-carriers are an outdated concept. They look impressive from any angle but the image is mainly a projected one.
airship is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.