Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Black Lancasters

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Black Lancasters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th August 2020 | 06:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 151
From: A better place.
Black Lancasters

Has this been publicised before?
Fascinating.
tartare is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2020 | 07:21
  #2 (permalink)  
Evertonian
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 13,463
Likes: 278
From: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Always enjoy Mark Feltons videos.
Buster Hyman is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2020 | 07:36
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 47
...
I think this thread in Hist & Nost may possibly be on the same subject -

Really
...
Lordflasheart is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2020 | 13:48
  #4 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,137
Likes: 5,738
From: Falling off the end of the thread
Aeroplane Monthly August 2020 covers the story, part of the problem was the length of the weapon needed to get it to work, I seem to remember it was distance to accelerate the charge up to speed, and hence the need for a lanc, but it was eventually resolved.

https://shop.keypublishing.com/issue...nthly-aug-2020
NutLoose is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2020 | 14:08
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
From: here,there,and everywhere
sorry I thought this was BLM
black
lancasters
matter
737bomar is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2020 | 16:08
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,174
Likes: 7
From: UK
If you are going to drop an atom bomb from a dodgy height the last colour you paint your aeroplane is black
Fareastdriver is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2020 | 16:55
  #7 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 485
From: England
From the height and speed the Lancaster would have dropped, I don't think the colour would have mattered much.
Herod is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2020 | 17:57
  #8 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,726
Likes: 103
From: The Winchester
Originally Posted by Herod
From the height and speed the Lancaster would have dropped, I don't think the colour would have mattered much.

Nevertheless such was briefly considered...
Scientists working on the atomic bomb quickly realized that the unusual size and weight of the devices--both the tubular "gun-type fission weapon" shape (Little Boy) and the oval plutonium implosion weapon shape (Fat Man)--would be too large to be delivered by a conventional bomber such as the B-17 or the B-24. In October 1943, Dr. Norman Ramsey, a member of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Group, suggested that the only airplane in the U.S. inventory capable of carrying either type of the proposed weapons shapes was the B-29 Superfortress. Even the B-29, however, would require extensive modifications to both its engines and its bomb bay in order to accommodate the enormous weapon.

Prior to the decision to use the B-29, military officials had given serious consideration to using the British Avro Lancaster to deliver the weapon, which the Royal Air Force had used to deliver the 5-ton Tallboy bombs developed in 1944. The Avro Lancaster would have required much less modification, but Major General Leslie Groves, the commander of the Manhattan Project, and General Henry H. Arnold, the Chief of United States Army Air Forces, wished to use an American plane.
https://www.atomicheritage.org/histo...ct-silverplate
wiggy is online now  
Reply
Old 11th August 2020 | 19:03
  #9 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 531
Likes: 115
From: East Sussex
Hap Arnold, the man that nearly got the whole world nuked in the Cuban missile crisis, because he only had ONE nuclear plan…. BOMB EVERYONE, even those not involved in the confrontation. JFK Sacked him when he found out that was his ONLY plan.

You get the impression that he would have rather have not dropped the bomb, than let the RAF do it with a British plane.
WB627 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2020 | 20:40
  #10 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Lincolnshire
WB627
Hap Arnold died in 1950, so had nothing to do with JFK. Surely it was Curtis Le May who clashed with JFK and McNamara, by wanting to bomb Cuba and, later, North Vietnam.
Mach2 is offline  
Reply
Old 12th August 2020 | 16:29
  #11 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 531
Likes: 115
From: East Sussex
Originally Posted by Mach2
WB627
Hap Arnold died in 1950, so had nothing to do with JFK. Surely it was Curtis Le May who clashed with JFK and McNamara, by wanting to bomb Cuba and, later, North Vietnam.
Yup my bad. And apologies to Hap Arnold
WB627 is offline  
Reply
Old 12th August 2020 | 17:49
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 232
Likes: 2
From: UK
The back-up possibility to use a Lancaster is mentioned in General Grove's account of the Manhattan Project "Now it can be told" A great read from a management perspective with all the various challenges and obstacles that had to be overcome. Should be required reading at Staff College in my opinion. General Groves was selected for the project due to his excellent reputation and recent work overseeing the building of the Pentagon (as a Major). He did get promoted to Lt Col for the Manhattan Project and later on to General during the project.
Flugplatz is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2020 | 10:32
  #13 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Lixwm,Flintshire
Silver Plate B-29

The B-29 Superfortress "Silverplates" were designed around the two atomic bombs.

During World War II, the 509th Composite Group included 15 B-29s with special "Silverplate" modifications, and 1,800 men. The Silverplate B-29s had modifications necessary to deliver atomic weapons, which included an extensively modified bomb bay with pneumatic doors, special propellors, modified engines and the deletion of protective armour and gun turrets.

The group was commanded by Paul Tibbets who was one of the first pilots to complete a European tour, He was then a test pilot on the B-29 before being hand-picked to train and lead the bomb group.

The USA controlled all facets of the Atomic Bomb delivery and manufacture. The idea that they would hand it over to the RAF to deliver in their under-powered and obsolescent Lancasters is derisory. The B29 was a mature, next generation device and was in front line use (See the pictures of the hundreds of them on the four runways at Tinian)

I always thought that Lancasters at Enstone were used in flight refuelling tests.for ETO




ColinB is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2020 | 12:20
  #14 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 326
From: Royal Berkshire
Originally Posted by ColinB
The USA controlled all facets of the Atomic Bomb delivery and manufacture. The idea that they would hand it over to the RAF to deliver in their under-powered and obsolescent Lancasters is derisory. The B29 was a mature, next generation device and was in front line use (See the pictures of the hundreds of them on the four runways at Tinian)
I think you're missing the point that, as designed the B-29 couldn't drop the bombs....and at the time, it wasn't known *if* Boeing could re-design the aircraft to do so, due to the spar mods, hence the contingency plan for using Lancs.
I'm not sure though that the contingency plan to use Lancs ever included using RAF crews though......?
GeeRam is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2020 | 15:55
  #15 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 376
From: Hampshire
Would it have made more sense if they have intended to use something similar to the short lived Lancaster Mk VIs, the two-stage supercharger Merlins of which gave a reputed 313 mph top speed and 28,000' service ceiling for a 65,000 lb TOW? There are various versions of what they were used for beyond a Pathfinder/Master Bomber role and they were also used for development/trials after withdrawal from the front line. "...surviving aircraft were used by Rolls-Royce, the Royal Aircraft Establishment and the Bomb Ballistics Unit (BBU) for various testing and experimental duties." The history of the B VI seems very confused with FF dates in both '43 and ''44 quoted, different numbers produced/converted, and higher top speeds, JB713 is believed to have out run an intercepting Ju88 returning from a raid on Berlin. So could the Black Lancs have been additional B VIs (or an unknown different B III conversion) lost in the paper work?
SLXOwft is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2020 | 16:30
  #16 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 3
From: NEW YORK
Would any Lancaster variant have had the range to reach Japan from Tinian with a 10,000 pound payload?
etudiant is offline  
Reply
Old 14th August 2020 | 18:17
  #17 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 651
Likes: 10
From: England
Sounds like some of the respondents here need to actually watch the programme.
Ewan Whosearmy is offline  
Reply
Old 15th August 2020 | 02:03
  #18 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 6,563
Likes: 952
From: Aus
I'm not sure though that the contingency plan to use Lancs ever included using RAF crews though
The plan was to use a US crew. If you wish to crunch numbers re Lanc range here is a starting point.

http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...erformance.pdf
megan is offline  
Reply
Old 15th August 2020 | 08:55
  #19 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Lixwm,Flintshire
Hap Arnold died in 1950, so had nothing to do with JFK. Surely it was Curtis Le May who clashed with JFK and McNamara, by wanting to bomb Cuba and, later, North Vietnam.

The same Curtis Lemay was the Vice Presidential Republican candidate at the 1964 election along with Barry Goldwater!

Last edited by ColinB; 15th August 2020 at 09:19.
ColinB is offline  
Reply
Old 15th August 2020 | 09:15
  #20 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Lixwm,Flintshire
I think you're missing the point that, as designed the B-29 couldn't drop the bombs....and at the time, it wasn't known *if* Boeing could re-design the aircraft to do so, due to the spar mods, hence the contingency plan for using Lancs.
I'm not sure though that the contingency plan to use Lancs ever included using RAF crews though......?
The B-29 Silverplate could and did carry both of the atomic devices successfully. It is not generally appreciated the great difference in sizes and shapes of the two bombs one uranium based and the other plutonium. The Trinity test and the two bombs were all detonated in 3-4 weeks. The Group on Tinian had been training for a long period and delivered the bombs within days of receipt.
There is a wealth of information on the admirable Atomic Heritage Foundation website with many unique photographs.
I am an admirer of the program maker and enjoy his programs but this particular one seems to be fostering yet another urban legend.
Apologies if I have expressed this clumsily
ColinB is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.