Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RNZAF not so useful

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RNZAF not so useful

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Aug 2002, 22:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post RNZAF not so useful

Heard on the grape vine that the dozen or so chaps that came over from NZ aren't getting citizenship here in the UK for the standard period of 5 years. I think this means their security clearance will be fairly basic. Obviously not really a problem for tanking and transport but the FJ guys must be very limited in the types of operational sorties they will be able to perform. I guess even those on the Herc and the Rod may be limited in what they can do.

I also heard a while back, not sure if it made it on here, that a few slots were "made" for some of the NZ guys to slot in to Valley. A few studes were surprisingly chopped at a late stage from the Linton course due to move to Valley at the same time.

Now don't get me wrong here, the pilots from NZ have made the best they could from a bad situation back home and anyone in their position would have done the same. Whether or not there were tactical choppings going on was nothing to do with them. But just think of the number of people who struggled a bit at Linton but were given the chance at Valley and pulled it all together. I certainly know a few and I'm sure there will be a few on this forum to put their hands up.

How pi$$ed off would you be if you had lost your place to someone who couldn't do the job properly?
Cartman, E is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2002, 07:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bucks
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many of the RNZAF guys came straight from a Front Line over there and went straight to the Front Line in the UK. Their pedigree is very good and having flown with some of them I can assure you that their proven single seat track record means that on the Front Line their skills will be used. They were very carefully vetted and sent to appropriate forces according to their nationality - remember many people in New Zealand have parents etc who only went out a generation ago. The idea that loads of places at Valley were taken up is, I believe , a spurious rumour which probably started amongst those who need some kind of explanation as to why they did not quite make it through
Dogstar is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2002, 10:21
  #3 (permalink)  
TOOM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Retired 18 months ago after 30 yrs in RAF, during this time I never took UK citizenship - couldn't stomach forking out £700+ for the privilege (??). RAF was content that I remain a Kiwi and it never impeded the numerous PVs I underwent. Maybe, times they have a changed!

Given the shortage in the frontline, is it likely that UK-trained FJ candidates would be chopped to make way for Kiwis? Maybe slipped, but hardly chopped methinks.
 
Old 14th Aug 2002, 13:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Overlooking the beach, NZ
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

Eric Cartman,
Your fat is obviously in your brain, not your big bones. You need to listen to rumours with a grain of salt.
There are already at least 2 ex-RNZAF Kiwis at leuchars, frontline and ready to go. There is also no way we would chop people to give them a place (the RAF certainly would put them on holding til a space arrived) as we are so short- so either some one was feeding you a line or you have some friends with a chip on their shoulder from being chopped.
bakseetblatherer is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2002, 14:27
  #5 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,440
Received 1,602 Likes on 734 Posts
Well Ken Hayr didn't seem to have any problems as a Kiwi.
ORAC is online now  
Old 14th Aug 2002, 17:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: preston
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
kiwis

and neither did al deere or maori cunningham.
canberra is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2002, 18:48
  #7 (permalink)  
DuckDogers
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Don't seem to recall that the 4 Kiwis at Colt on the Shaguar seem to have had any problems with any of what you mention.

Did not seem to affect Air Vice Marshall Sir Keith Park GCB KBE MC DFC DCL



Come to think of it, it has not stopped our Canadian exchange officer serving on two very recent Ops either.............
 
Old 14th Aug 2002, 19:27
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Glorious Devon
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was a time just after WW2 when there were as many Kiwis on the Air Council as Poms. In my time "top Kiwi" was Sir John(?) Elworthy - CAS then CDS. When commanding a Lanc squadron during the war he was grounded by the quacks for ulcers. he insisted on finishing his tour from the rear gunner's seat.
Flatus Veteranus is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2002, 21:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,346
Received 19 Likes on 10 Posts
I flew with a Kiwi from a secret RAF base on the Moray Firth, and he never had a problem keeping secrets - and nor did I when I then joined the RNZAF... we do have the same head of state as each other.
reynoldsno1 is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2002, 21:54
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
There are, I believe, differences between exchange officers of different nationalities. Some can do/see stuff and some can't. There are also differences between exchange officers and RAF officers who are not British. My understanding is that these Kiwis will be restricted in some areas initially although I can't see we can't get that changed to suit our requirements. And I don't think you can simply say that they made the best of a bad job, implying that we somehow have had the wool pulled over our eyes - I think we actually actively recruited them (?)

Red tape aside, I have flown with a number of these guys and hour for hour they are at least as good as our better FJ JPs. despite their relatively limited experience they have a lot to give - I only hope we are big enough to accept it.
Background Noise is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2002, 02:21
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Age: 84
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if the first allied air ace[Kain],and the three VC's Trent, Trigg and Ward] were ever asked for passport verification?

Didn't the Kiwi P3 almost carry the Fincastle this year, and would have but for the aircraft falling over and missing the last sortie?

I heard they also threw the best party as usual!
Samuel is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2002, 07:12
  #12 (permalink)  
Lupus Domesticus
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NZ
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A point to consider; the "R" in RNZAF is the same as the "R" in RAF.

I guess someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that the reason the NZDF doesn't use the top tier of commissioned rank, and the second from top only in the case of the CDF, was because NZ forces are regarded as part of HM forces.
BlueWolf is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2002, 08:28
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Age: 84
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You're not wrong BW; 'tis indeed the "Royal" New Zealand Air Force, and my commission parchment states [before the bit where I become "Trusty and Well-beloved !"],: "Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, New Zealand and her other blah blah ".

If I'm not mistaken, it has always been possible for Kiwis to complete initial flying training in New Zealand prior to joining the RAF; all formalised through the British High Commission in Wellington.

Last edited by Samuel; 16th Aug 2002 at 08:40.
Samuel is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2002, 12:07
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: preston
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
keith park

liked the picture of keith park. pity he's wearing the uniform of an air marshal not an air-vice marshal!
canberra is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2002, 14:19
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ice station kilo
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Samuel
Yes the kiwis did very well at Fincastle (as always) but I suggest that they may well had to do a little more than just take off on the last trip. However the kiwis still punch so far above their weight it's untrue, even after the loss of the A4s. This is all down to the quality of the guys and girls from the land of the long white cloud
circle kay is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2002, 13:31
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: All the leaves are brown, and the sky is grey....
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
numb-nutz

The hiccup is over AMRAAM. The good ol USA says specifically: "USA, UK and Australian Eyes Only (Not New Zealand)"

The intent is not to give the Info to the NZ Govt because of their nuclear free stance.

RAF vetting of kiwi pilots can/will allow them access because, as RAF Officers, they are bound by the Official Secrets Act irrespective of citizenship.

Eric Cartman, the rest of your post is "chocolate-salty-balls"

WRT Fincastle; kiwis have always fought nicely above their weight but its a bit worthless if, on the days of the war, you cant get your chariot off the ground! About time you brought some decent kit and allowed your 'guys/gals' back to the party.
tone-uncage-fire is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.