Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

The F-35 thread, Mk II

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

The F-35 thread, Mk II

Old 10th Mar 2020, 14:37
  #61 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 56
Posts: 6,430
Originally Posted by Not_a_boffin View Post
RN School of Flight Deck Ops got four mock-ups a couple of years back.

http://www.naval-technology.com/unca...ining-5856094/
There was a slightly stripped down Merlin outside the hangar, perhaps for a similar purpose?
treadigraph is online now  
Old 10th Mar 2020, 15:31
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 659
Originally Posted by golder View Post
Only one aircraft doing what it can. Where others had many and even AEW. Does anyone really think the F-35 won't be chosen as the best aircraft, when everything is assessed?

It had 90% availability at red flag
https://www.janes.com/article/94680/...very-milestone

Also 90% on deployment.
https://www.airforcemag.com/deployed...istics-system/
F-35s from Hill’s 4th Fighter Squadron deployed to Al Dhafra Air Base, United Arab Emirates, for six months last year. The jets almost instantly began conducting airstrikes while 70 percent of the fleet was able to conduct its mission, said Brig. Gen. David Abba, director of the Air Force’s F-35 Integration Office. By the end of the deployment, that rate had climbed to more than 90 percent.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...ature=emb_logo
The Finnish evaluation is recognized to be thorough and objective.
That is why I thought the inability of the F-35 to complete the presumably demanding flight schedule was noteworthy.
etudiant is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2020, 16:35
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2
Originally Posted by treadigraph View Post
There was a slightly stripped down Merlin outside the hangar, perhaps for a similar purpose?
One of the pre-production aircraft, it's been at Siskin/SFDO since the 90s. There's a dozen or so old SHAR, plus some Lynx and a Sea King or two lurking in the hangars. Used to be some old Wessex as well back in the day.

Demobbed - Out of Service British Military Aircraft
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2020, 17:36
  #64 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 56
Posts: 6,430
Thanks, probably be passing again tomorrow afternoon, will keep a sharper lookout!
treadigraph is online now  
Old 18th Mar 2020, 16:21
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 73
Posts: 1,080
Article on Flight Global:-
F-35 ALIS open deficiencies grow to 4,700 over two years

Intro:-
Lockheed Martin has made several improvements to the F-35’s Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS), but the technology remains plagued by about 4,700 deficiencies.

A new Government Accountability Office (GOA) review of ALIS, the F-35’s ground-based software support system, outlines the scope of problems still affecting the technology, which has long been plagued by issues.

The report says 66% of outstanding deficiencies came to light in the last two years, and 22% are “Category 1’ or “Category 2” problems.
Lyneham Lad is online now  
Old 18th Mar 2020, 23:56
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: australia
Posts: 90
They fixed that by changing the name, problem solved
https://www.airforcemag.com/f-35-pro...alis-for-odin/
golder is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 08:44
  #67 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 10,405
This USAF pilot is flying the F-35B from USS America ? Alert 5

This USAF pilot is flying the F-35B from USS America



ORAC is online now  
Old 20th Mar 2020, 16:10
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 893
USAF Rapid Unit Dynamic Employment (RUDE)

Video from the F-35 Lightning II Joint Project Office on 34th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron.

RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2020, 16:13
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 1,625
"It takes a dedicated team of talented maintainers, pilots and professionals to ready the F-35 for sustained combat operations."

You know when I was at school Career Guidance never told me I could make a living writing stuff like that..................
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2020, 12:32
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Dundee
Posts: 1
What capability?

The UK declared the F-35 operational even though the fleet was suffering from availability, infrastructure, logistics and security issues, auditors have revealed.

The UK National Audit Office (NAO) found that the December 2018 initial operating capability (IOC) from land bases was granted with 67 exceptions, with almost one-third of those still yet to be resolved more than a year later.

It is not clear on how many criteria IOC (Land) was judged, but the process is common practice, officials say, noting that waiting for all issues to be fully addressed before declaring the aircraft operational would “needlessly withhold” the capability from the front-line.

My bold.

https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/budget-policy-operations/uk-declared-f-35-operational-despite-issues-auditors-say
weemonkey is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2020, 16:08
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,341
weemonkey,

It was the same for the Hunter F1, Phantom FGR2, Tornado GR1, etc etc etc...
pr00ne is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2020, 22:48
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Dundee
Posts: 1
What was the same?

weemonkey is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2020, 22:58
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 49
Posts: 967
Originally Posted by Not_a_boffin View Post
One of the pre-production aircraft, it's been at Siskin/SFDO since the 90s. There's a dozen or so old SHAR, plus some Lynx and a Sea King or two lurking in the hangars. Used to be some old Wessex as well back in the day.

Demobbed - Out of Service British Military Aircraft

SFDO use the first pre-production EH101 and an engineering training mock up airframe that looks convincing from a distance. Sadly the Wessex have long gone, most of them to the fire dump down the road at Predannack.

Digression over, back to pointy whizzy things.
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2020, 23:16
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: australia
Posts: 90
Originally Posted by weemonkey View Post
What was the same?
"The fleet was suffering from availability, infrastructure, logistics and security issues"
golder is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2020, 11:59
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,341
Got there before me golder, thanks!

weemonkey,

golder has eloquently made my point.

All the aircraft I named suffered from issues around serviceability, availability and capability when first introduced, others, like the Swift F1, never recovered.
pr00ne is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2020, 16:22
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Dundee
Posts: 1
Originally Posted by pr00ne View Post
Got there before me golder, thanks!

weemonkey,

golder has eloquently made my point.

All the aircraft I named suffered from issues around serviceability, availability and capability when first introduced, others, like the Swift F1, never recovered.
Can't comment on the Hunter but I think you're pushing it on the other two, what airframe security issues plagued the GR1 for example?
weemonkey is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2020, 21:06
  #77 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 10,405
USMC cutting their F-35 buy by about 120-130 aircraft.

It is being inferred they are binning their entire F-35C buy (which would fit with operating the F-35B from the America class in littoral waters or from onshore).

The question then would be to see if the USN follows suit.

https://www.snafu-solomon.com/2020/0...-of-f-35s.html

https://www.snafu-solomon.com/2020/0...bers-does.html

ORAC is online now  
Old 25th Mar 2020, 21:54
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 1,625
They're losing their tanks as well - supposed to make them "more flexible" and not just a look-a-like to the other forces
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2020, 03:54
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: florida
Age: 77
Posts: 1,200
Salute!

I don't think the final numbers are in yet, ORAC. That's for the "mix".

As with the F-4 way back and the USMC buying Harriers at the same time, getting to the required/desired mix takes some time. Then we had the Hornet and Super Harrier mix in the 80's. Now we have the Bee and the Cee mix lately.

What the jarheads come up with is gonna be interesting. They moved out ahead of USAF early on, and left our local training base ( Eglin) for S.C. and AZ. Then they actually deployed to west PAC and have been flying there from land and a gator navy boat.

As far as ALIS goes, the system prolly needs more management attention defining the maintenance issues ALIS was intended for than the data-gathering capability it has. It sounded great when briefed ten years ago, but has been a problem compared to the way we did things for the Viper and Hornet and Eagle.

Meanwhile, the Stubbie is doing work in Iceland that has become interesting. The handoffs between the RNAF Stubbies outta Iceland and the RAF folks has been very smooth from what we are seeing.

Gums sends...



gums is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2020, 18:06
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Longton, Lancs, UK
Age: 76
Posts: 1,528
waiting for all issues to be fully addressed before declaring the aircraft operational would “needlessly withhold” the capability

Your 'bold' weemonkey. Nothing untoward in any of this. Security issues are just that - you'll never likely know. As the GR1 desk officer in MoD, I did know those (very few) that were applicable to GR1. After IOC, all were resolved in timely order.
jindabyne is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.