Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

HH-60W - Jolly Green II

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

HH-60W - Jolly Green II

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jul 2021, 03:26
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Gold Sector
Age: 70
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nicknames

and ... with the possible exception of the Huey, can't you see just how silly they are?
HAS59 is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2022, 17:07
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,150
Received 101 Likes on 54 Posts
Head to Head with Hind

Whiskey ACM against Hind
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...-an-mi-24-hind


cheers
chopper2004 is online now  
Old 23rd Oct 2022, 17:29
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 510 Likes on 212 Posts
ACM.....looked more like some formation flying and some photo opportunities.

Now equip both sets of aircraft with simulated weapons as used in Aggressor Training for the FJ's to include on the Door Guns and you would have my full attention.

Memory serves me the USAF shot down a US Army Blackhawk (maybe two) in Iraq using F-15's.
SASless is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2022, 17:35
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,251
Received 332 Likes on 185 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
ACM.....looked more like some formation flying and some photo opportunities.

Now equip both sets of aircraft with simulated weapons as used in Aggressor Training for the FJ's to include on the Door Guns and you would have my full attention.

Memory serves me the USAF shot down a US Army Blackhawk (maybe two) in Iraq using F-15's.
Yes - 2. Mistaken for Hinds. Killed a bunch of pax too.
212man is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2022, 17:40
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,815
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by HAS59
The US Army had it right when they named their helicopters after American First Nation tribes.
The US Air Force, bless them, will insist on giving their aircraft silly nicknames, often ignoring the official 'reporting name'.
This is just the latest - taken to the ultimate level of stupidity by making an annoying and often confusing nickname into an official designation.
I could cite several examples but the informed audience need no reminding of them.
Don't their armed forces branches ever consult each other?
Don't forget there was another 'Blackhawk', it being the Sikorsky S 67, so the H 60 family should be the 'Blackhawk 11'.
chevvron is online now  
Old 23rd Oct 2022, 17:54
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,815
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
Perhaps the UK. MoD might look hard at the new improved Black Hawk as a replacement for the antique Pumas.

Hard to beat success....a concept foreign to the MoD when it comes to buying off. the shelf aircraft.
I seem to recall Westland's trying to set up production of the Blackhawk at Yeovil in the mid '80s together with a re-engined UK version called the WS70; a provisional order of 88 aircraft were signed for by Saudi Arabia and just 2 aircraft were assembled and flown, one with Rolls Royce engines but lack of government funding as the EH101 was being developed meant the project just died.
Anyway what was wrong with the Westland W30?

Last edited by chevvron; 23rd Oct 2022 at 19:37.
chevvron is online now  
Old 23rd Oct 2022, 22:12
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,200
Received 395 Likes on 245 Posts
Originally Posted by HAS59
The US Army had it right when they named their helicopters after American First Nation tribes.
The US Air Force, bless them, will insist on giving their aircraft silly nicknames, often ignoring the official 'reporting name'.
This is just the latest - taken to the ultimate level of stupidity by making an annoying and often confusing nickname into an official designation.
I could cite several examples but the informed audience need no reminding of them.
Don't their armed forces branches ever consult each other?
It's worth saying over a year later:


Originally Posted by 212man
Yes - 2. Mistaken for Hinds. Killed a bunch of pax too.
Some of them were from allied nations and part of the UN Missions in Northern Iraq in support of Kurds, after Desert Storm. If memory serves, 26 souls lost.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2022, 22:56
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 510 Likes on 212 Posts
Admittedly the US Naval Aviation community have some nick names for their aircraft too.

One such among several is the Phrog......the Boeing Vertol CH-46.

SASless is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2024, 22:06
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,150
Received 101 Likes on 54 Posts
Kadena

33rd RQS receives theirs

https://www.kadena.af.mil/News/Artic...ove-to-kadena/








chopper2004 is online now  
Old 10th Feb 2024, 15:49
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,150
Received 101 Likes on 54 Posts
920th Rescue Wing receives theirs

https://www.afrc.af.mil/News/Article...ii-helicopter/

cheers
chopper2004 is online now  
Old 13th Feb 2024, 17:09
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hobe Sound, Florida
Posts: 950
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Chevvron, I heard a differing version of the WS-70 situation, but it ended with the Saudis buying standard UH-60s thru the US State Dept FMS ( Foreign Military Sales ) Program, wherein countries friendly to the US buy equipment at the same price as the US Military pays. Pretty sure that applies to spares etc as well.
JohnDixson is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by JohnDixson:
Old 13th Feb 2024, 21:27
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: England
Posts: 14,971
Received 122 Likes on 58 Posts
Jesus Christ is there any job that thing couldn't do in our military service? And if it couldn't then a Chinook would come in and do it instead?

4 squadrons of those would be a game changer.

WWW
Wee Weasley Welshman is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 13th Feb 2024, 22:12
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,339
Received 61 Likes on 44 Posts
Originally Posted by Wee Weasley Welshman
Jesus Christ is there any job that thing couldn't do in our military service? And if it couldn't then a Chinook would come in and do it instead?

4 squadrons of those would be a game changer.

WWW
It's not Westland/Airbus/Leo/Yeovil. End of.

CG
charliegolf is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2024, 12:59
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hobe Sound, Florida
Posts: 950
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Chopper 2004, I think all those who became aware of the wartime rescues performed by the original Jollies and their A1 escorts will cheer on the designation Jolly Green.
You know, a lot of folks have a frame of reference re pilot rescues during the Korean War created by the Bridges of Toko-Ri movie. But the fact is that the USAF also flew Sikorsky S-51s doing rescues and one of those pilots, Cliff Brown, joined the test pilot office at Sikorsky afterwards. He did perform a rescue which had some humorous aspects, such that one day after the Vietnam war was winding down, we were visited by some of the Son Tay rescue raid pilots and they came looking to meet Cliff as his rescue from Korea had created some celebrated notoriety. Will send separately.
JohnDixson is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.