Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

F-117 Nighthawk still flying

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F-117 Nighthawk still flying

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Oct 2019, 01:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,068
Received 2,939 Likes on 1,252 Posts
F-117 Nighthawk still flying

Not bad for an aircraft retired in 2008.

https://combataircraft.keypublishing...st-photos-yet/
NutLoose is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2019, 01:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,821
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Not bad for an aircraft retired in 2008.

https://combataircraft.keypublishing...st-photos-yet/
Already been mentioned in a thread on this forum about 5 years ago.
chevvron is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2019, 06:29
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,287
Received 39 Likes on 30 Posts
Already been mentioned in a thread on this forum about 5 years ago.
OMG why didn't the poster check PPRUNE for a five year old posting? Shame on him....
TBM-Legend is online now  
Old 6th Oct 2019, 07:08
  #4 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,446
Received 1,603 Likes on 735 Posts
Could have just checked Wiki......

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_F-117_Nighthawk

........Although officially retired, the F-117 fleet remains intact and photos show the aircraft carefully mothballed.[53] Some of the aircraft are flown periodically,[78]and have been spotted flying as recently as February 2019.[79] [80] [81] [82] In March 2019, it was reported that four F-117s had been secretly deployed to the Middle East in 2016 and that one had to make an emergency landing at Ali Al Salem (AAS), Kuwait sometime late that year.[83][[i]verification needed] An F-117 was also photographed in 2019 carrying unit markings previously unassociated with the aircraft – a band on the tail bearing the name Dark Knights, suggesting an either official or unofficial squadron is maintaining the Nighthawks.[84] In July 2019, one Nighthawk was spotted flying above Death Valley, trailing behind a KC-135R Stratotanker in a hybrid aggressor scheme.[85]........
ORAC is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2019, 13:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,709
Received 38 Likes on 23 Posts
Still think it's a distraction technique from something much more hush hush. Why else fly it in public areas if it's just a check flight to ensure they remain airworthy
Davef68 is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2019, 15:10
  #6 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 429 Likes on 226 Posts
Might just be a Mirage...
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2019, 22:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New Zealand
Age: 59
Posts: 26
Received 23 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
Might just be a Mirage...
Or its Russian counterpart, the Optical Illyushin...
mike1964 is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2019, 12:56
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,470
Received 364 Likes on 213 Posts
makes sense -use it to train everyone from mechanics to cleaners - a lot cheaper screwing up a remedial paint job on an old 117 than something newer..................

and yes they're not the same but the idea is to fix it in people's brains that these TYPE of aircraft are very different and require very special handling at every step
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2019, 16:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Beyond the M25
Posts: 523
Received 49 Likes on 25 Posts
Originally Posted by Davef68
Still think it's a distraction technique from something much more hush hush. Why else fly it in public areas if it's just a check flight to ensure they remain airworthy
Perhaps because it is just a check flight to ensure they remain airworthy. Occam's Razor, and all that.
Mil-26Man is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2019, 08:40
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wilds of Warwickshire
Posts: 240
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
-117s

My best guess would be that they are providing a ‘LO Agressor’ Unit to hone future tactics etc.
KiloB is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2019, 08:50
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,578
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Davef68
Still think it's a distraction technique from something much more hush hush
Of course, that's what they could want you to think...
dead_pan is online now  
Old 8th Oct 2019, 11:00
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,336
Received 81 Likes on 33 Posts
Looking at it from this angle it looks like a flying saucer! . Just sayin’...


Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2019, 14:55
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,062
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
I think it is still an interesting and valid topic. I always thought the retirement was a bit premature, and the 117 could still be quite useful for the US and a few other nations.
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2019, 21:00
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,821
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Wasn't there a 'suggestion' the RAF might take over some; some RAF exchange pilots did train on them after all.
chevvron is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2019, 08:33
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,821
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by sandiego89
I think it is still an interesting and valid topic. I always thought the retirement was a bit premature, and the 117 could still be quite useful for the US and a few other nations.
The Dof D refused to let one land at Farnborough claiming our 2,000m LDA (used for airshow traffic only - normally it's 1800m) wasn't long enough.
If 2000m is OK for an SR71, what LDA does the F117 need then?
chevvron is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2019, 12:17
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: the heathen lands
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by chevvron
Wasn't there a 'suggestion' the RAF might take over some; some RAF exchange pilots did train on them after all.
there was certainly an offer from the US in the 80's(iirc), but the RAF - and government - took the view that F-117 was so devastatingly expensive to operate (in whole force/effect terms) that it alone would hoover up most of of the RAF's budget for pretty much everything.
cokecan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.