Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Could an armed T-X adequately defend the United States?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Could an armed T-X adequately defend the United States?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Sep 2019, 22:45
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,077
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Better have a boatload of these spread out. It’s a marginally Mach aircraft by a search on its characteristics. It’ll take all of its range and speed to conduct a tail chase intercept on a 8:20 departure to Kansas City that’s gone NORDO.
West Coast is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2019, 00:11
  #42 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 4,185
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
This is me we’re talking about. What do you think I was flying?!
Jag or 'Awk.....

Jackonicko is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2019, 00:44
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: florida
Age: 81
Posts: 1,610
Received 55 Likes on 16 Posts
Salute!

Best chance U.S. had for a national air defense-only plane was the F-20, and Northrop's last ditch maneuver was to get USAF Air Guard equipped with that rascal in order to get a few hundred sold.

The countries that could have used it wanted the big dogs for their President's birthday parade.

I was one of the three pilot experts on Northrop's legal team in 1985 for their suit vs MacAir on propietary stuff on the F-18 and F-20. So I had many sim hours in a cosmic sim there, plus some time in the F-18 sim at St Louis. The other two were a F-18 OT&E guy and Chuck Yeager.

Gums sends....

Last edited by gums; 17th Sep 2019 at 02:45.
gums is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2019, 10:19
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Etudiant is right.
A threat model should be defined first in detail. "Homeland Defense" sounds a bit vague. Drug smugglers, self-made drones, what else?
A_Van is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2019, 10:42
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Dundee
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could it tail chase one of those Gulfstream thingies down at 50k, because that's what the cartels will use to avoid interception, unless roe says shoot before ID...that's REALLY high up and they MOTOR...I have actually seen one (confirmed by fr) from the ground here in PERTHSHIRE tiny, tiny dot on a thin, thin contrail....
weemonkey is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2019, 18:02
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by weemonkey
Could it tail chase one of those Gulfstream thingies down at 50k, because that's what the cartels will use to avoid interception, unless roe says shoot before ID...that's REALLY high up and they MOTOR...I have actually seen one (confirmed by fr) from the ground here in PERTHSHIRE tiny, tiny dot on a thin, thin contrail....
Gulfstreams are expensive and need decent runways, so they are easier to intercept on the ground. It is much harder to swat midges than flies.
Imho, the US drug problem reflects both high volume imports of high priced drugs by airplane as well as mass volume of cheap drugs by boat. Do note this excludes the home grown Purdue Oxycontin delivery system.
All is probably fixable in an enhanced surveillance state, but it is less clear whether the public is on board for that.
etudiant is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.