Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Iran with nuclear tipped Missiles....Game Changer?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Iran with nuclear tipped Missiles....Game Changer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jun 2019, 15:41
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Swamp
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VinRouge


i am not advocating systems as extreme as either China or Iran. Simply pointing out in a system where self interest prevails, a sensible balanced and researched compromise cannot be reached. State pensions currently consume 12% of GDP, yes, gdp, not tax revenue. It’s growing at an unsustainable rate meaning that those of working age currently contributing are likely to either not see a state pension before 70+ or will see it means tested. Mainly in part to the triple lock introduced for political reasons. That is a lot of money to be spending on a system that was supposed to be a safety net and instead had metamorphosed into something much different. Good luck to the politician pointing out to the populace that expenditure on state pension and healthcare has now led to the loss of education grants, massive cuts to the state education system, defence, Infra projects, r and d research and policing. You can’t blame it on all on the financial crisis when it’s being spent elsewhere. We have just had over 30% of the participating population vote for a party in the European elections that doesn’t even have a manifesto. So please spare me excuses that the democratic system is in any way functional.

Whether the other systems are undesirable to you is an utterly moot point. The Chinese are now matching and in some cases overtaking western tech in terms of quality, particularly in the fields of electronics, quantum computing and Generalised AI. We can bang on about moral higher ground as much as we like, in 50 years, it will be them and not us that are setting global trends.

as to Iran “Death cult”, sounds like someone has been falling for the free trump kool aid. Interesting developments over the pond at the moment, something about a big wall to keep the cockroaches out, interment of immigrant children, intelligent creation vs science, climate change denial and banning abortion in a number of states. Not too sure accusations of lunacy need to be thrown Eastward at the moment.
Sorry Vinrouge, Although it is still lots of money, the UK actually spends less than 8% of GDP on state pensions, not sure where you got 12% from.
F.O.D is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2019, 16:37
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by F.O.D
Sorry Vinrouge, Although it is still lots of money, the UK actually spends less than 8% of GDP on state pensions, not sure where you got 12% from.
Aah, yep, good point. The 12% figure ive read recently, possibly the future projection with anticipated Growth plus accounting from liabilities from the boomer generation hitting state retirement. Ive read David Willetts book "The Pinch" recently so possibly from there. The growth as a percentage of GDP (seeing how much we are devoting as a percentage of the economy) is below. In short, social protection (of which state pension is by far the largest portion) accounts for over 240 billion, compared to 46 billion for defence ad 102 billion for education.

link




Last edited by VinRouge; 9th Jun 2019 at 16:49.
VinRouge is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2019, 17:00
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,131
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
I'm still struggling to see the link between what the UK spends on pensions and, 'Iran with nuclear tipped Missiles....Game Changer?'
melmothtw is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2019, 20:13
  #24 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,141
Received 223 Likes on 65 Posts
Agreed, melmothtw. This whole thread is getting boring. Ignore at leisure.
Herod is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2019, 21:03
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: UK
Age: 69
Posts: 1,405
Received 40 Likes on 22 Posts
It's entertaining reading human vs chatbot 😁
beardy is online now  
Old 11th Jun 2019, 00:00
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,298
Received 356 Likes on 195 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
Preventing the Iranian Regime from gaining nuclear weapons is just one of those issues....
Which is exactly what the Nuclear deal was meant to do, you know the one which every international monitoring organisation (including Trump’s own State Department) said Iran was in compliance with?

I perceive you care not for the Man and that generates an inability to accept he is in fact getting something done despite all of the opposition he faces from the Establishment.
His Secretary of State is a former CIA director.

His Secretary of Treasury is a former Goldman Sachs executive.

His Attorney General was the former GHW Bush Administration Attorney General.

His Secretary of Education is a former politcial lobbyist.

His Secratary’s of Energy and Agriculture are former Republican politicians and every other cabinet Secretary is a former long term government employee in a various federal departments

His Chief of Staff is a long time Republican politician.

His CIA director is a long term CIA employee.

And of course his National Security Advisor is the epitome of the word “establishment” having established himself as the prime neocon of the last few decades.

Every single member of the Trump Administration is a member of this so called “establishment” whether you like it or not. Instead of “draining the swamp” he drained it, found the most disgusting, vile establishment creatures at the bottom and put them in his administration (Bolton, Pompeo etc)


dr dre is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2019, 02:38
  #27 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 510 Likes on 212 Posts
Odd isn't it.....a Republican President enlisting Republicans to serve in his administration....imagine that!

Did not Obama fill his administration with.....Democrats?

Just imagine picking a long term career CIA Employee to be the Director of the .....CIA who would have thunk it?

I think you doth protest too much.

SASless is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2019, 10:37
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West of Suez
Posts: 336
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dr dre
Every single member of the Trump Administration is a member of this so called “establishment” whether you like it or not. Instead of “draining the swamp” he drained it, found the most disgusting, vile establishment creatures at the bottom and put them in his administration (Bolton, Pompeo etc)

"Keep your friends close and your enemies closer"

AnglianAV8R is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2019, 15:25
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 194
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Another Proverb....Birds of a feather flock together.

A good word to remember is ....
Charlatan
Good Vibs is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2019, 16:04
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Age: 67
Posts: 167
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
He just negotiated an Agreement with Mexico re that problem using the promise of Tariffs if they did not begin to take some real action
.

Sorry, that's not negotiation, it's bullying and one that will likely come back to bite the citizens of USA.

That isn't to say that there isn't an II problem on the US-Mexico border, there is, in the same way that some EU countries face an II problem from places such as Africa. I don't know what the solution is, I suspect you need to go to the country of origin of the II to understand why they think their preferred country of destination is the right place or a better place to be. In the EU, an immigrant is supposed to be "processed" by the country within the EU that they first set foot in, some of the EU member states, most notably France, seem to ignore that.

Until then, we have to be careful that we don't confuse legal immigration with illegal immigration with refugees
golfbananajam is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.