What do military crews think about NOTAMs?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What do military crews think about NOTAMs?
I am doing academic research on the NOTAM system and I would be very interested to know your thoughts and opinions as military pilots about it. What is it that you dislike about the current system? What is it that you find difficult to work with? I would assume that your answers depend a lot on the type you are flying and your operational role. How is your perception of the system different than that of your civilian colleagues? Is it typical for you in the military to read through the NOTAMs yourselves or would you have other officers doing most of that work for you?
Any feedback would be incredibly useful for my research. I am studying several different groups of users but it is difficult to understand the needs of each group.
Any feedback would be incredibly useful for my research. I am studying several different groups of users but it is difficult to understand the needs of each group.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
One method is to have a flight planning section manned by a senior air craftsman or corporal who will filter the NOTAMs for his unit's mission. These will usually be plotted on a display board enabling a quick overview by a crew. They can then read the relevant details. Those for further afield will not be plotted but grouped by country or area.
For units not using a central briefing facility the local NOTAMs will be forwarded; for overseas flights they will be forwarded on request.
Many of the examples cited by High Spirits do indeed clutter a brief. A crew planning a high transit will skip over low level notifications except perhaps close to destination. Unlit obstructions are indeed 'noise' but thankfully rarely do they bite you. Notable ones are wire strikes, typically cables across Norwegian fjords and tragically the EA6 cable strike in Italy.
For units not using a central briefing facility the local NOTAMs will be forwarded; for overseas flights they will be forwarded on request.
Many of the examples cited by High Spirits do indeed clutter a brief. A crew planning a high transit will skip over low level notifications except perhaps close to destination. Unlit obstructions are indeed 'noise' but thankfully rarely do they bite you. Notable ones are wire strikes, typically cables across Norwegian fjords and tragically the EA6 cable strike in Italy.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NOTAMs have a place for sure but relevance and depiction to assist crews is critical. Dissemination to multiple sites who then plot them gives rise to many opportunities for human error. Likewise a chart with pins in allows refinement of reading but then you have to plot each one anyway. Different categories are useful i.e. terminal versus en-route and maybe upper limit filtering. Technology now exists to centrally depict for all to view, an example being CADS that has to be used for most flight planning deconfliction anyway; likewise import to mission planners. This coupled with user tailorable relevance filters has the potential to make life easier and it is more efficient to plot once and view rather than many times over plotting. At the time I left the military there seemed a reluctance to centrally plot and depict, I know not why.
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: N/W London
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gliding NOTAMs
Its curious how fixated everyone is about issuing NOTAMs for gliding comps whilst ignoring the fact that on a typical good gliding day in the UK, especially at the weekend, there are probably more gliders flying XC than would have entered the comp to which the NOTAM relates.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,560
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes
on
30 Posts
I suppose that they are the equivalent of a Health and Safety warning.... don't issue one and its your fault if something happens: issue one and it is the fault of the aircraft crew.
Why do we still call them NOTAMs?
In my futuristic novel "Flight of the Seawind", I call them NOTAPs, Notices to Air Personnel.
My feedback on the name has been favourable, even encouraging.
Am I the only one who realises that we have women in Aviation?
My feedback on the name has been favourable, even encouraging.
Am I the only one who realises that we have women in Aviation?
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SW
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In my futuristic novel "Flight of the Seawind", https://www.amazon.com/Flight-Seawin.../dp/B01LLVAY16
I call them NOTAPs, Notices to Air Personnel.
My feedback on the name has been favourable, even encouraging.
Am I the only one who realises that we have women in Aviation?
I call them NOTAPs, Notices to Air Personnel.
My feedback on the name has been favourable, even encouraging.
Am I the only one who realises that we have women in Aviation?
I'm pretty sure that everyone in aviation and this forum is aware that there are women in it.
Not so the general population perhaps, but then people who are not aware there are women pilots/aircrew/engineers are likely to be ignorant of many things.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I really see that most of the issues I have identified in my research with civilians also apply directly to the military. Sometimes the existence of several different users is used as an argument against making any changes. We say oh this and that needs to be changed and then authorities come back counter arguing that "oh it is complex" and "so many different users are affected, have you thought of the impact?". At the end of the day I see that we really need a new operational concept to clear up this 100 year old mess. Thank you all very much for your feedback and time, I really appreciate it and I will do my best to integrate your feedback on my research.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
Can you expand on your experience?