RAF pilots get new G-force training centre
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Outside the Fence
Age: 71
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
RAF pilots get new G-force training centre
Fast jet pilots have begun training at a brand new £44m test facility at RAF Cranwell to help them cope with the physical effects of acceleration forces at top speeds in mid-air manoeuvres.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47109716
Well over 30 years ago GLoc became a known condition within the USAF. The F16 community learnt the hard way about rapid onset G forces and the training required to fly a 9G jet.
Brooks AFB, the USAF equivalent to AMTC, had a modern centrifuge all those years ago.
Why did the RAF not source such Training Aids prior to the 9g Typhoon coming into service? After the initial training on how to combat rapid onset and high g forces, the best way to maintain proficiency is through practice. Two trips a day, 30+ hours a month, much of it flying ACT was how currency was achieved. Even in the F4 Phantom (not RAF) the RTS allowed 8g and it was pulled regularly, but only when required!
How come this news has received greater Press/TV/CAS coverage than the declaration of the RAF's first F35 Squadron?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47109716
Well over 30 years ago GLoc became a known condition within the USAF. The F16 community learnt the hard way about rapid onset G forces and the training required to fly a 9G jet.
Brooks AFB, the USAF equivalent to AMTC, had a modern centrifuge all those years ago.
Why did the RAF not source such Training Aids prior to the 9g Typhoon coming into service? After the initial training on how to combat rapid onset and high g forces, the best way to maintain proficiency is through practice. Two trips a day, 30+ hours a month, much of it flying ACT was how currency was achieved. Even in the F4 Phantom (not RAF) the RTS allowed 8g and it was pulled regularly, but only when required!
How come this news has received greater Press/TV/CAS coverage than the declaration of the RAF's first F35 Squadron?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Outside the Fence
Age: 71
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
57mm,
You must have been lucky enough to have flown the jet in it's early years in RAF service. From the early 80s onwards both the FG1 and FRR2 were plagued with poor decisions which led to dire g limits being imposed. At least those on 74 Sqn were slightly better off!
You must have been lucky enough to have flown the jet in it's early years in RAF service. From the early 80s onwards both the FG1 and FRR2 were plagued with poor decisions which led to dire g limits being imposed. At least those on 74 Sqn were slightly better off!
Indeed, Dominator2 ! For most of the year in the early '80s, we flew in Charlie fit with a normal indicated limit of less than +5G - then for 2 weeks we went mad with the tanks off at Deci.
At an Aggressor debrief, I was asked why I didn't fly a guns jink. When I told the Aggressor mate of our pathetic G limits, he commented "What sort of an air force sends you to fight with one hand tied behind your back?". Quite so!
We also had dire fuel burn limits placed upon us due to the 'moratorium'. Hence we lumbered around at 350KIAS most of the time - what a way to operate such a powerful fighter.
At an Aggressor debrief, I was asked why I didn't fly a guns jink. When I told the Aggressor mate of our pathetic G limits, he commented "What sort of an air force sends you to fight with one hand tied behind your back?". Quite so!
We also had dire fuel burn limits placed upon us due to the 'moratorium'. Hence we lumbered around at 350KIAS most of the time - what a way to operate such a powerful fighter.
When the School of Aviation Medicine people moved from Farnborough to Pyestock, they said they would continue using the centrifuge in the old IAM building for a while as it would take several years for a new one to become operational because the concrete base when laid would need several years to stabilise.
Last edited by chevvron; 6th Feb 2019 at 08:26.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Outside the Fence
Age: 71
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
Stuff,
Thanks for the article.
Why are those responsible for this c**kup not held to account. 20 years late on delivery and CAS pats himself on the back for a job well done! When will people be held to account for this waste of Public Money?
Thanks for the article.
THE TRUE cost of a hi-tech pilot training device that was never delivered to the RAF has risen to £12m, after red-faced defence ministers were finally forced to disclose the full amount of taxpayers’ money wasted on the botched project. Scotland on Sunday revealed last month that the Ministry of Defence had secretly paid an American company some 7m in compensation, despite the firm’s failure to meet a contract to build a human centrifuge to give fighter pilots vital training in handling "high G" forces during jet flights.
MoD chiefs pencilled in 1999 as the opening date for the facility, but cancelled the contract in 2001 after it became clear they had no chance of seeing the equipment delivered. A senior member of the defence committee last night warned ministers that the latest procurement fiasco would not go unnoticed at Westminster. "The most worrying thing is that they never seem to learn from big mistakes like this."
MoD chiefs pencilled in 1999 as the opening date for the facility, but cancelled the contract in 2001 after it became clear they had no chance of seeing the equipment delivered. A senior member of the defence committee last night warned ministers that the latest procurement fiasco would not go unnoticed at Westminster. "The most worrying thing is that they never seem to learn from big mistakes like this."
Stitchbitch.
Ah yes, the centrifuge debacle. It was bubbling under when I left in 01.
Never any suggestion of dissagreements between PE, AMTC and IAM hierarchy about the way ahead.
P*ss ups and brewerys come to mind.
Glad to see they finally have something even if it is 25 years late.
Ah yes, the centrifuge debacle. It was bubbling under when I left in 01.
Never any suggestion of dissagreements between PE, AMTC and IAM hierarchy about the way ahead.
P*ss ups and brewerys come to mind.
Glad to see they finally have something even if it is 25 years late.
