Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Wittering Tutor in a field

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Wittering Tutor in a field

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Oct 2018, 07:08
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oxford
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6FTS confirm all Tutors returned to flying now.
tmmorris is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2018, 08:31
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 784
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Our fields are bigger

This was the result of an occasional Ppruner having the rudder lock hard over at 3000ft a couple of years ago.

Fleet was was grounded until they confirmed someone had used the wrong screw to secure a floor panel and it caused a jammed rudder mechanism.
CoodaShooda is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2018, 09:34
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On a more positive note at least the propeller had not fallen off. Expect fleet grounding in 3,2,1....
Bigpants is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2018, 14:56
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,561
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
I even have a beach landing/aero-tow out of a beach once.


Back in 1976, a YUAS Bulldog on summer camp to Woodvale crashed on Southport Beach after becoming locked into a flat spin. The student and instructor bailed out - the instructor quite late and hurt his back. The CFI heard the mayday and seeing the injured QFI lying close to the wrecked aircraft attempted to land on the deserted beach (which was a recognised forced landing point) so that he could administer first aid. Unfortunately he found the one soft spot of sand for miles and at the end of the landing run he dug in a wheel causing the aircraft to catch its wing tip and it ended up on its back. Reports in the newspapers varied: the most lurid was in the Sun which headlined with "Hundreds of holidaymakers ran in fear as two trainer planes collided in mid-air and fell blazing into the sea".
Wensleydale is online now  
Old 6th Oct 2018, 17:57
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,809
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
OMG ...
MPN11 is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2018, 18:44
  #26 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
The CFI heard the mayday and seeing the injured QFI lying close to the wrecked aircraft attempted to land on the deserted beach (which was a recognised forced landing point) so that he could administer first aid. Unfortunately he found the one soft spot of sand for miles and at the end of the landing run he dug in a wheel causing the aircraft to catch its wing tip and it ended up on its back.
But that one was repaired and later given to me to fly; it had my name written on the engine cowling for some years. It flew OK but on the ground it always tended to sit tail low. Although it was rumoured that it could not afterwards be used for aerobatics, there was no such limitation in the F700 during my time. Then someone else crashed it in a field during another forced landing at a summer camp and it was eventually sold for spares.

https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=143797
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2018, 20:09
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,561
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
The similar report for XX618 that had the spin is here... https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=60093

and XX623 here. https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=60092
Wensleydale is online now  
Old 7th Oct 2018, 07:49
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: london
Posts: 721
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
During my time on the Bulldog, it was drummed into us that getting out by 2000ft was imperative. The incident below we were told at the time was left very late, around 800ft if IIRC. The story doing the rounds then was that one of the pilots went out as per procedure and broke his nose and ankle on the tailplane. The other had sky diving experience and went out in a in a sky diving attitude and was unscathed. I have never enjoyed spinning if I am not wearing a parachute ever since. https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=137218
rolling20 is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2018, 18:38
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,808
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
The Bulldog had a strict limit on fuel asymmetry for spinning. Students were always required to keep the left and right tank contents in balance, so often the selector was moved from the 'BOTH' position to achieve this....

The only delayed spin recovery I ever encountered was when my (very good) student entered a right hand spin. It didn't seem to want to recover, so I thought that he must have relaxed the back pressure too soon before applying full left rudder. So I took control, re-applied full pro-spin, then recovered, but again it took a while....

I wrote up the trip in Bloggs' notes, but later we found that one fuel gauge was sticking and was hugely in error. So in large red pen I amended Bloggs' write to say "Not his fault - aircraft had an unserviceable fuel indication system!".

Keeping the ball in the middle and the fuel selector on 'BOTH' would probably have kept most Bulldogs' fuel in better balance than believing the useless fuel gauged and balancing as indicated.

Quite why we lived with such a well-known snag as the Bulldog fuel indication sysem for so long beats me....
BEagle is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2018, 22:49
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,937
Received 2,851 Likes on 1,219 Posts
Originally Posted by CoodaShooda
Our fields are bigger

This was the result of an occasional Ppruner having the rudder lock hard over at 3000ft a couple of years ago.

Fleet was was grounded until they confirmed someone had used the wrong screw to secure a floor panel and it caused a jammed rudder mechanism.

Cessna suffered a problem with their rudders jamming over, took 50 odd years to come to light and sadly an instuctor died, see
Main
NutLoose is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2018, 05:41
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: london
Posts: 721
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Beagle, I am guessing this one would have been around your time on the Bulldog? https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=137257. The poor instructor fell from his harness on the descent. IIRC, but Beagle please correct me, you undid your chute harness first ,before the safety harness at the end of the sortie? The enquiry believed he had released it prior to abandonment. When the 82 spinning loss took place we were all drilled on quick abandonment. One of the star pupil flyers and who later became a CFS instructor, 'banged out' in the hangar sans parachute, with the words, ' I think I had better do that again!' We thought it funny at the time.
rolling20 is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2018, 17:26
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I watched the two Bulldogs come to grief on Southport beach whilst travelling as a car passenger along the coast road. I assumed them to be large remote control models and stated that "Someone has just lost a small fortune" - I guess size is relative to distance - and I did not see any parachutes. (But then I must not have seen anyone with an RC transceiver either ;-) )
Tiger_mate is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2018, 21:10
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,447
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the Tutor fleet still grounded? My son thinks he’s going flying this weekend.
Megaton is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2018, 05:56
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 54
Posts: 206
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Not grounded anymore, judging by the Tutor doing some very agricultural Aeros over my house on Sunday!
!
DCThumb is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2018, 08:31
  #35 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
Originally Posted by rolling20
Beagle, I am guessing this one would have been around your time on the Bulldog? https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=137257. The poor instructor fell from his harness on the descent. IIRC, but Beagle please correct me, you undid your chute harness first ,before the safety harness at the end of the sortie? The enquiry believed he had released it prior to abandonment. When the 82 spinning loss took place we were all drilled on quick abandonment. One of the star pupil flyers and who later became a CFS instructor, 'banged out' in the hangar sans parachute, with the words, ' I think I had better do that again!' We thought it funny at the time.
During my time as a Bulldog QFI (late 80s/early 90s) the engineering powers on high had become concerned that parachute packs were suffering wear in normal use. To reduce wear on the packs we were instructed to remove our parachutes before exiting the aircraft, either after shutdown or during a running crew change. We were required to sign for carrying out a practice "emergency abandonment drill" every month.

I point blank refused to ever remove my parachute harness in the aircraft because I saw it as a highly unsafe practice. Mental conditioning to routinely undo the parachute harness before climbing out was just asking for trouble, imho, so I practiced my abandonment drill every I climbed out. There was another, later fatal loss of control accident when it was thought that the instructor inadvertently unlocked his 'chute harness (box rotated by 90 degrees) before abandoning the aircraft and that the QRB was knocked during his subsequent parachute descent, whereupon he tragically fell out of his harness.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2018, 09:34
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: london
Posts: 721
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
I seem to remember Shy, that the parachute was the seat backing and we always left them in situ in the cockpit?
rolling20 is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2018, 10:25
  #37 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
Originally Posted by rolling20
I seem to remember Shy, that the parachute was the seat backing and we always left them in situ in the cockpit?
Sorry, no! The 'chute pack certainly had a stiff back to it (which is the part that first showed wear in use) but it was separate from the seat and kept in the line office. We were supposed to undo the chute pack, climb out, then retrieve it. As I said, I never left mine in the seat.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2018, 11:25
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
As groundcrew at CFS, '81- '93 all parachutes were left in seats and it did worry me about muscle memory & unlocking seat harness & parachute QRF together every time you exit the aircraft normally. I did on occassion have to do countless canopy jettison resets in the hangar so all pilots could actually experience canopy emergency opening. As an occasional passenger I also had to practice emergency abandonment. It wasn't an issue not unlocking the parachute - it was too novel an action in the first place. When I was in the cockpit ground running there was no need to be strapped at all.
132bod is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2018, 14:02
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: london
Posts: 721
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
Sorry, no! The 'chute pack certainly had a stiff back to it (which is the part that first showed wear in use) but it was separate from the seat and kept in the line office. We were supposed to undo the chute pack, climb out, then retrieve it. As I said, I never left mine in the seat.
As 132bod has mentioned there Shy, I am fairly certain on my time 81/82 the chute was left in situ. As per my previous mention of my student colleague practice abandon without the chute. Drill was undo chute, undo harness after a sortie. He was going through the normal sequence to leave the cockpit on the ground. Of course it may have changed by the end of the decade. 132bod thank you for the info.
rolling20 is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2018, 14:33
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,808
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
rolling20, I had known the chap who was killed when he released both seat harness and parachute - but only as a fellow ULAS student many years earlier.

I can't remember the exact procedure we used when I became a Bulldog QFI in 1991, but the fatal accident was still quite fresh in peoples' minds and some procedure had been adopted to reduce the risk of inadvertent chute QRF release during a real abandonment.
BEagle is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.