Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Ex RAF Tristars August 2018

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Ex RAF Tristars August 2018

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd September 2018 | 10:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,138
Likes: 5,738
From: Falling off the end of the thread
Ex RAF Tristars August 2018

Sorry for the poor quality, lousy weather coupled with the fact they they were quick grabs through the car window as stopping was frowned upon, but I knew some in here would like to see the old girls, the VC10 is ZA147 and plans are afoot to move her to display at St Athan I believe, anyway on with the photos. Bigger views on Flickr


Tristar ZE705 by Tony Taylor, on Flickr


Tristar ZD951 by Tony Taylor, on Flickr


Tristar ZD948 by Tony Taylor, on Flickr


Tristar N705CS by Tony Taylor, on Flickr


Tristar N405CS by Tony Taylor, on Flickr


Tristar 948 by Tony Taylor, on Flickr
NutLoose is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2018 | 11:18
  #2 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 8,023
Likes: 314
From: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
oooh, they aren't half big buggers!
MPN11 is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2018 | 13:46
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 780
Likes: 13
From: East Anglia
Who nicked all the AAR probes?
1.3VStall is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2018 | 14:25
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 14
From: Lincs
Originally Posted by 1.3VStall
Who nicked all the AAR probes?
Apparently only 4 TriStar ever carried the probe and they were removed in the early 1990s.

ZD949 Pinky
ZD950
ZD951 Perky
ZD953

1991

Aug - policy raised to remove fuel probes to save fuel and reduce noise
From

http://www.216squadronassociation.or...rom%20F540.pdf
TEEEJ is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2018 | 16:24
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 3
From: UK
Thank you for posting those Nutty! The TriStars were often poorly managed and undersold by the hierarchy of RAF. A great pity that they will probably end up scrapped at Brunters? The exploits and achievements of those aircraft with 216 Sqn run to far greater depths than the simple resume quoted from the association link. I do hope that some way of saving one of the tankers is found. At the very least, a full nose section back to the front doors should be professionally prepared as an indoor exhibit for Cosford.

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2018 | 16:51
  #6 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Aviation Qualifications: ATCO
Posts: 8,023
Likes: 314
From: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Ex-Adj of 216 regrets the passing of the Comet 4.

(Her, not me)
MPN11 is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2018 | 17:09
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 3
From: UK
Originally Posted by MPN11
Ex-Adj of 216 regrets the passing of the Comet 4.

(Her, not me)
Yes! A great pity that larger aircraft seem to suffer badly in the preservation stakes!

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2018 | 17:22
  #8 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,458
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
The first one taken over from BA by the RAF (we were told it had very few airframe hours logged being ex 'BOAC' fleet rather than ex 'BEA' fleet) came into Farnborough from Heathrow, still in BA colours and night stopped. Next day the crew enjoyed themselves doing low passes along the runway to enable the Farnborough 'boffins' to map its IR signature, then it departed to Brize.
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2018 | 17:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 3
From: UK
Chevy, The RAF TriStars were all L1011-500, the hot-ship with RB211-524, reduced length, longer wings and increased MTOW to 233T. The ex BA RAF ones were all fairly new and, were modified as the tankers, with MTOW 249T.

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2018 | 18:16
  #10 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 881
Likes: 68
From: UK
One was scrapped a year or so back - any idea why that one got the chop when these were saved pending a sale?

Or were more scrapped out of the fleet of 9?
rog747 is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2018 | 19:02
  #11 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 106
From: London
What happened to the proposed sale of these aircraft to an American company which was to operate them as tankers. ?

Not sure we ever had them as BOAC aircraft, thought they were all introduced to “ BEA” when BEA. Paid Lockheed to remove , at great cost, the INS systems which were not required for short haul ops. Later they were used for long haul, when , guess what, INS was needed !


Or so the story went !

DG.
RetiredBA/BY is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2018 | 19:32
  #12 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,458
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
I vaguely recall BA long haul or BOAC 'inherited' them through a takeover but didn't really want them as they were rather committed to the 747 so they got rid of them without using them too much.
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2018 | 22:19
  #13 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 171
Likes: 9
From: Dark Side of West Wales
Originally Posted by chevvron
I vaguely recall BA long haul or BOAC 'inherited' them through a takeover but didn't really want them as they were rather committed to the 747 so they got rid of them without using them too much.
I think some may have been acquired by BA when they bought British Caledonian.
DODGYOLDFART is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2018 | 23:14
  #14 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,109
Likes: 290
From: Nevada, USA
[QUOTE=RetiredBA/BY;10256442]
What happened to the proposed sale of these aircraft to an American company which was to operate them as tankers. ?

Tempus Applied Solutions completed acquisition of the following 6 aircraft earlier in the year - announced March 12, 2018: https://www.tempus-as.com/media-press-release-L1011.php

RAF KC1 - Lockheed MSN 1157 - RAF ZD948 - FAA N304CS

RAF KC1 - Lockheed MSN 1164 - RAF ZD950 - FAA N405CS

RAF KC1 - Lockheed MSN 1165 - RAF ZD951 - FAA N309CS

RAF KC1 - Lockheed MSN 1174 - RAF ZD953 - FAA N705CS

RAF C2 - Lockheed MSN 1186 - RAF ZE704 - FAA N507CS

RAF C2 - Lockheed MSN 1188 - RAF ZE705 - FAA N703CS

Tempus already has a number of DoD contracts for "special mission" aircraft: https://www.tempus-as.com/fly-bespoke-services.php

They currently plan to use 3 of the Tristars as tanker / transports and 3 as spares sources.

The company submitted a bid for a DoD contract in late-June 2018 and if successful it should be announced by end-September. I don't know what the nature of the bid was - I presume it was to provide additional services over and above those provided by Omega which only has one DC10-40 and 2 x B707-320 in its fleet.
RAFEngO74to09 is online now  
Reply
Old 24th September 2018 | 02:18
  #15 (permalink)  
10 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 20
From: Horsham, England, UK. ---o--O--o---
Originally Posted by MPN11
oooh, they aren't half big buggers!

They looked massive from the Runway Caravan at Akrotiri...

Like a block of flats landing next to you!
Out Of Trim is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2018 | 07:46
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 3
From: UK
Originally Posted by chevvron
I vaguely recall BA long haul or BOAC 'inherited' them through a takeover but didn't really want them as they were rather committed to the 747 so they got rid of them without using them too much.
Why not look it up! As I said, the 6 RAF Tankers were ex BA, fairly new , built '78. The Pax only RAF TriStars (3) were ex Pan Am. There were other TriStars, but not the RAF ones.

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2018 | 09:56
  #17 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 129
From: Here
As Onceapilot says, the -500s were all 'bought' as BA aircraft (Older -1 were BEA orders) for South American routes. There are various stories as to why they were sold, the most recurring one that it was a balance sheet excercise prior to privatising BA. The deal for the 6 aircraft was about £50m (The Pan-am a/c were ~£20m each). BA then leased a couple of -500s a year or so later.

Originally Posted by rog747
One was scrapped a year or so back - any idea why that one got the chop when these were saved pending a sale?

Or were more scrapped out of the fleet of 9?
ZD949 (The mid life crisis a/c with the glass cockpit) was scrapped at Marshalls in 2014, as was C2A ZE706. ZD952 was scrapped at Kemble, also in 2014

Last edited by Davef68; 25th September 2018 at 10:27.
Davef68 is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2018 | 10:08
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 3
From: UK
Originally Posted by Davef68
As Onceapilot says, the -500s were all 'bought' as BA aircraft (Older -1 were BEA orders) for South American routes. There are various stories as to why they were sold, the most recurring one that it was a balance sheet excercise prior to privatising BA. The deal for the 6 aircraft was about £50m (The Pan-am a/c were ~£20m each). BA then leased a couple of -500s a year or so later.



ZD949 (The mid life update a/c with the glass cockpit) was scrapped at Marshalls in 2014, as was C2A ZE709. ZD952 was scrapped at Kemble, aslo in 2014

C2A was ZE706.

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Reply
Old 25th September 2018 | 07:44
  #19 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,398
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
A rumour in the early 1980s was that ba binned its TriStars due to some bean counter noting that the engine fuel flow rate was greater than for the 747. Hence the TriStar went and the 747 stayed in service.

Only after the decision had been made did someone point out that the TriStar had one less engine than the 747, so the total burn rate was actually less....
BEagle is online now  
Reply
Old 25th September 2018 | 10:27
  #20 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 129
From: Here
Originally Posted by Onceapilot
C2A was ZE706.

OAP
I knew no good would come of using the number pad rather than the proper numbers at the top of the keyboard! Fat fingers slipped!
Davef68 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.