FTRS and promotion
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FTRS and promotion
I see from the RAF Reserves site that there is a notice stating that *Chief of Staff Personnel has directed that from COP 7 Sep 18, all FTRS and ADC promotions are to be suspended. I take this to mean that a post can no longer advertise for 1 rank below (i.e. eligible for promotion in accordance with etc etc) and therefore a Wg Cdr post must be filled by a former Wg Cdr or higher? Anyone know why this has been put in place? Is this the same for the Army/Navy Reserve Forces?
Last edited by NavyNav2; 13th Sep 2018 at 19:25. Reason: error
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never personally experienced an officer moving 2 ranks up, only either 1 up (with an existing promotable score) or 1 or even 2 ranks down. Never seen anyone struggle with a failed-to-ressetle-successfully post either.
What I have experienced is the lack of candidates due to the pool of card-carrying AFPS75 personnel drying up.
What I have experienced is the lack of candidates due to the pool of card-carrying AFPS75 personnel drying up.
I always thought the best way to resolve this one was to promote someone for a post on acting-rank and then give them 2 shows on the Promotion Selection Board (PSB). If they score then they should be promoted to substantive, if after 2x PSBs they should be given notice or busted down a rank? If you want promoting to OF-3, OF-4 and OF-5 then you need to do IOD and ACSC(R).
That would then at least offer some parity and stop some of the sniping from the Regular cadre (which in some cases is probably deserved!).
That would then at least offer some parity and stop some of the sniping from the Regular cadre (which in some cases is probably deserved!).
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Road to Nowhere
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think there's an element of the 'law of unintended consequences' about this. Is Manning starting to see FTRS applications to return to Regular service in a higher rank than when people left?
They also need to sort the nonsense of the pensions payments too, though. FTRS is a new career and should be treated as such. If you've earned your pension, and leave the Regular RAF you should be able to claim it, and anything you earn as an FTRS role should be separate. The problem is that the FTRS is treated almost as a continuation of service, and I have seen people move back and forth between regular and reserve. However, people want to advance in their careers and if you're a wg cdr at the top of the scale, the only way to increase remuneration under the current system may be to apply for the next rank up as FTRS.
It is understandable to see how promotion within a particular specialist area (as described by downsizer) comes about. As in the outside world, people apply for the next rank up and they look like (may be) the best person for the job, especially versus an unknown quantity. The tick in the box comes from having been scored by a prom board, at some point previously, but not promoted due to the limited opportunities at the time. I can't see how this works for the second promotion though - perhaps that's why COS Pers has taken this action.
The real inequity here, which I have seen, is that the limitation in promotions below the PSL means that some areas really needing resource, which Manning considers to be third tier, are simply not filled. In part this is due to a need to retain a balance at the lower ranks, so the areas needing these posts to be filled switch them to FTRS and 'take' people from the lower ranks anyway. A sqn ldr prom board may score 15, with a PSL of 4, offer another 2 acting, leaving positions 7 and below with nothing, even though there may be 20 or more gaps at SO1 level. The desperate gapped-post owner is forced to convert the gap to wg cdr FTRS, with the blessing of Manning, and number 15 off the board applies for and gets it. This leaves a gap at the SO2 level and Nos 7-14 go without, but the £ cost to the RAF is not much different to what the Regular post would've cost - the capitation cost of a wg cdr is considerable, FTRS or not!
Oh and yes, Vascodegama, you are correct!
They also need to sort the nonsense of the pensions payments too, though. FTRS is a new career and should be treated as such. If you've earned your pension, and leave the Regular RAF you should be able to claim it, and anything you earn as an FTRS role should be separate. The problem is that the FTRS is treated almost as a continuation of service, and I have seen people move back and forth between regular and reserve. However, people want to advance in their careers and if you're a wg cdr at the top of the scale, the only way to increase remuneration under the current system may be to apply for the next rank up as FTRS.
It is understandable to see how promotion within a particular specialist area (as described by downsizer) comes about. As in the outside world, people apply for the next rank up and they look like (may be) the best person for the job, especially versus an unknown quantity. The tick in the box comes from having been scored by a prom board, at some point previously, but not promoted due to the limited opportunities at the time. I can't see how this works for the second promotion though - perhaps that's why COS Pers has taken this action.
The real inequity here, which I have seen, is that the limitation in promotions below the PSL means that some areas really needing resource, which Manning considers to be third tier, are simply not filled. In part this is due to a need to retain a balance at the lower ranks, so the areas needing these posts to be filled switch them to FTRS and 'take' people from the lower ranks anyway. A sqn ldr prom board may score 15, with a PSL of 4, offer another 2 acting, leaving positions 7 and below with nothing, even though there may be 20 or more gaps at SO1 level. The desperate gapped-post owner is forced to convert the gap to wg cdr FTRS, with the blessing of Manning, and number 15 off the board applies for and gets it. This leaves a gap at the SO2 level and Nos 7-14 go without, but the £ cost to the RAF is not much different to what the Regular post would've cost - the capitation cost of a wg cdr is considerable, FTRS or not!
Oh and yes, Vascodegama, you are correct!
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
I always thought the best way to resolve this one was to promote someone for a post on acting-rank and then give them 2 shows on the Promotion Selection Board (PSB). If they score then they should be promoted to substantive, if after 2x PSBs they should be given notice or busted down a rank?
There were lots of posts in the personnel bulletin of a similar desirability.
My suggestion was to allow applications from a lower rank. They could be boarded and more importantly interviewed as the current system did not take an individual's circumstances into consideration.
It was rejected out of hand.
Never personally experienced an officer moving 2 ranks up, only either 1 up (with an existing promotable score) or 1 or even 2 ranks down. Never seen anyone struggle with a failed-to-ressetle-successfully post either.
What I have experienced is the lack of candidates due to the pool of card-carrying AFPS75 personnel drying up.
What I have experienced is the lack of candidates due to the pool of card-carrying AFPS75 personnel drying up.
I think there's an element of the 'law of unintended consequences' about this. Is Manning starting to see FTRS applications to return to Regular service in a higher rank than when people left?
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
That seems to be one of the big attractions of FTRS, having spoken to a couple of FTRS Sqn Ldrs who couldn’t get promoted as Regulars. I also know of at least one Gp Capt who did the same thing; all it seems to take is a positive promotion recommendation to ‘qualify’ an individual to apply for a post they like the look of at the higher rank.
It’s already happening. There are areas such as Cyber where blind eyes are turned to get expertise in the door, and I know ‘lateral transfers’ into senior ranks has been talked
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,815
Received 141 Likes
on
65 Posts
ISTR at one stage the FC world was desperately short of promotable officers ... possibly due to the demographics being out of kilter. Importation of senior officers from other Branches was deemed essential.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 75' from the runway edge and 150' from the threshold
Age: 74
Posts: 247
Received 31 Likes
on
13 Posts
Downsizer, Vasco, just look at 22Gp and the Air Cadet debacle
